The Phi measure of integrated information is not well-defined for general physical systems
Open accessAbstract
According to the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness, consciousness is a fundamental observer-independent property of physical systems, and the measure Phi of integrated information is identical to the quantity or level of consciousness. For this to be plausible, there should be no alternative formulae for Phi consistent with the axioms of IIT, and there should not be cases of Phi being ill-defined. This article presents three ways in which Phi, in its current formulation, fails to meet these standards, and discusses how this problem might be addressed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because consciousness is the way it is, the formulation of its properties in physical, operational terms should be unique and based on quantities that uniquely satisfy the postulates.
“Because consciousness is the way it is, the formulation of its properties in physical, operational terms should be unique and based on quantities that uniquely satisfy the postulates [12, 32].”
From Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical terms (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
To date, no unique and correct derivation of a theory from phenomenology exists, because phenomenology generally underdetermines the postulates of IIT and because the scope and nature of nonhuman experience is unknown.
“However, to date, no such derivation exists, as phenomenology seems to generally underdetermine the postulates of IIT (Bayne 2018; Barrett and Mediano 2019), and because it is unknown what the scope and nature of nonhuman experience is.”
From Falsification and consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Barrett and Mediano 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Barrett, A.B. (2016) A comment on Tononi & Koch (2015) 'Consciousness: here, there and everywhere?', Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B , 20140198.
- Barrett, A.B., & Seth, A.K. (2011). Practical measures of integrated information for time-series data. PLoS Comput. Biol. , 7(1): e1001052.
- Mayner, W.G.P., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., Findlay, G., Marchman, R. & Tononi, G. (2017) PyPhi: A toolbox for integrated information theory, arXiv , 1712.09644. · arXiv
- Mediano, P.A.M., Seth, A.K., & Barrett, A.B. (2018). Measuring integrated information: Comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation. arXiv , 1806.09373. · arXiv
- Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L. & Tononi, G. (2014) From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0, PLoS Computational Biology , 10 (5), e1003588.
- Sinai, Y. (2009) Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy, Scholarpedia , 4(3):2034.
- Tegmark, M. (2016) Improved Measures of Integrated Information. PLoS Comput Biol , 12(11): e1005123.
- Thurner, S. & Hanel, R. (2012) The entropy of non-ergodic complex systems - A derivation from first principles. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series , 16, 105-115.
- Tononi, G. & Koch, C. (2015) Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Phil Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140167.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albantakis, L., Barbosa, L., Findlay, G., Grasso, M., Haun, A. M., Marshall, W., Mayner, W. G. P., Zaeemzadeh, A., Boly, M., Juel, B. E., et al. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011465 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Safron, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00030 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The unfolding argument: Why IIT and other causal structure theories cannot explain consciousness
Doerig, A., Schurger, A., Hess, K., & Herzog, M. H. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.04.002 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Unpacking the complexities of consciousness: Theories and reflections
Mudrik, L., Boly, M., Dehaene, S., Fleming, S. M., Lamme, V., Seth, A., & Melloni, L. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106053 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
On the dangers of conflating strong and weak versions of a theory of consciousness
Lau, H., & Michel, M. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hjp3s · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The Mathematical Structure of Integrated Information Theory
Kleiner, J., & Tull, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.3389/fams.2020.602973 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Falsification and consciousness
Kleiner, J., & Hoel, E. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.03541 · Cited by 46
Falsification and consciousness
Kleiner, J., & Hoel, E. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
A measure centrality index for systematic empirical comparison of consciousness theories
Chis-Ciure, R., Melloni, L., & Northoff, G. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105670 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
What does it mean for consciousness to be multidimensional? A narrative review
Páleník, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430262 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“IIT’s concept of Φ has been criticized from various perspectives (Cerullo, 2015; Barrett and Mediano, 2019; Pautz, 2019), as has been the theory itself (e.g., Bayne, 2018; Doerig et al., 2019; Michel and Lau, 2020; Herzog et al., 2022; Fleming et al., 2023).”
Background
- Authors
- Barrett, A. B., & Mediano, P. A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1902.04321
- OpenAlex
- W7103608980
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L005131/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Keywords
- integrated information theory, consciousness, physical systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
