PreprintCited by 284Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

Variational Quantum Linear Solver

Open access
Bravo-Prieto, Carlos, LaRose, Ryan, Cerezo, M., Subasi, Yigit, Cincio, Lukasz, Coles, Patrick J.·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Previously proposed quantum algorithms for solving linear systems of equations cannot be implemented in the near term due to the required circuit depth. Here, we propose a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm, called Variational Quantum Linear Solver (VQLS), for solving linear systems on near-term quantum computers. VQLS seeks to variationally prepare $|x\rangle$ such that $A|x\rangle\propto|b\rangle$. We derive an operationally meaningful termination condition for VQLS that allows one to guarantee that a desired solution precision $ε$ is achieved. Specifically, we prove that $C \geq ε^2 / κ^2$, where $C$ is the VQLS cost function and $κ$ is the condition number of $A$. We present efficient quantum circuits to estimate $C$, while providing evidence for the classical hardness of its estimation. Using Rigetti's quantum computer, we successfully implement VQLS up to a problem size of $1024\times1024$. Finally, we numerically solve non-trivial problems of size up to $2^{50}\times2^{50}$. For the specific examples that we consider, we heuristically find that the time complexity of VQLS scales efficiently in $ε$, $κ$, and the system size $N$.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1909.05820

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pioneering quantum algorithms for linear systems will be difficult to implement in the near-term due to enormous circuit depth requirements.

    “These pioneering quantum algorithms, however, will be difficult to implement in the near-term due to the enormous circuit depth requirements [138].”

    From Variational quantum algorithms (2021) · cites this paper as [138]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. E. Alpaydin, Introduction to Machine Learning, 4th ed. (The MIT Press, 2020).
  2. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006).
  3. O. Bretscher, Linear Algebra With Applications, 5th ed. (Pearson, 2013).
  4. D. A. Spielman and N. Srivastava, "Graph spar- sification by effective resistances," SIAM J. Com- put. 40, 1913-1926 (2011). · DOI
  5. A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, "Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equa- tions," Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  6. A. Ambainis, "Variable time amplitude amplifi- cation and a faster quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations," arXiv:1010.4458 [quant-ph] . · arXiv
  7. Y. Subaşı, R. D. Somma, and D. Orsucci, "Quan- tum algorithms for systems of linear equations in- spired by adiabatic quantum computing," Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 060504 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  8. A. Childs, R. Kothari, and R. Somma, "Quan- tum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on pre- cision," SIAM J. Computing 46, 1920-1950 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  9. S. Chakraborty, A. Gilyén, and S. Jeffery, "The power of block-encoded matrix powers: im- proved regression techniques via faster Hamil- tonian simulation," in 46th International Collo- quium on Automata, Languages, and Program- ming (Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer In- formatik, 2019) pp. 33:1-33:14. · DOI · Paper page
  10. L. Wossnig, Z. Zhao, and A. Prakash, "Quan- tum linear system algorithm for dense matrices," Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 050502 (2018). · DOI
  11. J. Preskill, "Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond," Quantum 2, 79 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Y. Zheng, C. Song, M.-C. Chen, B. Xia, W. Liu, et al., "Solving systems of linear equations with a superconducting quantum processor," Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 210504 (2017). · DOI
  13. Y. Lee, J. Joo, and S. Lee, "Hybrid quantum lin- ear equation algorithm and its experimental test on IBM quantum experience," Scientific Reports 9, 4778 (2019). · DOI
  14. J. Pan, Y. Cao, X. Yao, Z. Li, C. Ju, et al., "Ex- perimental realization of quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations," Phys. Rev. A 89, 022313 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  15. X.-D. Cai, C. Weedbrook, Z.-E. Su, M.-C. Chen, Mile Gu, et al., "Experimental quantum comput- ing to solve systems of linear equations," Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 230501 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  16. S. Barz, I. Kassal, M. Ringbauer, Y. O. Lipp, B. Dakić, et al., "A two-qubit photonic quantum processor and its application to solving systems of linear equations," Scientific Reports 4, 6115 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  17. J. Wen, X. Kong, S. Wei, B. Wang, T. Xin, and G. Long, "Experimental realization of quantum algorithms for a linear system inspired by adi- abatic quantum computing," Phys. Rev. A 99, 012320 (2019). · DOI
  18. E. Anschuetz, J. Olson, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and Y. Cao, "Variational quantum factoring," in In- ternational Workshop on Quantum Technology and Optimization Problems (Springer, 2019) pp. 74-85. · DOI · Paper page
  19. A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O'Brien, "A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor," Nature Communications 5, 4213 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Y. Cao, J. Romero, J. P. Olson, M. Degroote, P. D. Johnson, et al., "Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing," Chemical Reviews 119, 10856-10915 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  21. O. Higgott, D. Wang, and S. Brierley, "Varia- tional Quantum Computation of Excited States," Quantum 3, 156 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  22. T. Jones, S. Endo, S. McArdle, X. Yuan, and S. C. Benjamin, "Variational quantum al- gorithms for discovering Hamiltonian spectra," Phys. Rev. A 99, 062304 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, "Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization," Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  24. C. Kokail, C. Maier, R. van Bijnen, T. Bry- dges, M. K. Joshi, P. Jurcevic, C. A. Muschik, P. Silvi, R. Blatt, C. F. Roos, and P. Zoller, "Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models," Nature 569, 355-360 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  25. K. Heya, K. M. Nakanishi, K. Mitarai, and K. Fujii, "Subspace variational quantum simula- tor," Phys. Rev. Research 5, 023078 (2023). · DOI
  26. Cristina Cirstoiu, Zoe Holmes, Joseph Iosue, Lukasz Cincio, Patrick J Coles, and An- drew Sornborger, "Variational fast forwarding for quantum simulation beyond the coherence time," npj Quantum Information 6, 82 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Xiao Yuan, Suguru Endo, Qi Zhao, Ying Li, and Simon C Benjamin, "Theory of variational quan- tum simulation," Quantum 3, 191 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  28. J. Romero, J. P. Olson, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, "Quantum autoencoders for efficient compression of quantum data," Quantum Science and Tech- nology 2, 045001 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  29. R. LaRose, A. Tikku, É. O'Neel-Judy, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, "Variational quantum state di- agonalization," npj Quantum Information 5, 57 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  30. C. Bravo-Prieto, D. García-Martín, and J. I. Latorre, "Quantum Singular Value Decomposer," Phys. Rev. A 101, 062310 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  31. M. Cerezo, Kunal Sharma, Andrew Arrasmith, and Patrick J Coles, "Variational quantum state eigensolver," npj Quantum Information 8, 113 (2022). · DOI
  32. S. Khatri, R. LaRose, A. Poremba, L. Cincio, A. T. Sornborger, and P. J. Coles, "Quantum- assisted quantum compiling," Quantum 3, 140 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  33. T. Jones and S. C Benjamin, "Robust quantum compilation and circuit optimisation via energy minimisation," Quantum 6, 628 (2022). · DOI
  34. A. Arrasmith, L. Cincio, A. T. Sornborger, W. H. Zurek, and P. J. Coles, "Variational consis- tent histories as a hybrid algorithm for quantum foundations," Nature communications 10, 3438 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Marco Cerezo, Alexander Poremba, Lukasz Cin- cio, and Patrick J Coles, "Variational quantum fidelity estimation," Quantum 4, 248 (2020). · DOI
  36. Bálint Koczor, Suguru Endo, Tyson Jones, Yuichiro Matsuzaki, and Simon C Benjamin, "Variational-state quantum metrology," New Journal of Physics 22, 083038 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  37. M Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cin- cio, and Patrick J Coles, "Cost function de- pendent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits," Nature Communications 12, 1791 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  38. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Com- putation and Quantum Information: 10th An- niversary Edition, 10th ed. (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, New York, NY, USA, 2011). · DOI · Paper page
  39. E. Knill and R. Laflamme, "Power of one bit of quantum information," Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5672-5675 (1998). · DOI
  40. K. Fujii, H. Kobayashi, T. Morimae, H. Nishimura, S. Tamate, and S. Tani, "Impossibility of Classically Simulating One- Clean-Qubit Model with Multiplicative Error," Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200502 (2018). · DOI
  41. T. Morimae, "Hardness of classically sampling the one-clean-qubit model with constant to- tal variation distance error," Phys. Rev. A 96, 040302 (2017). · DOI
  42. A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, "Hardware-efficient variational quan- tum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets," Nature 549, 242 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Jarrod R McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven, "Barren plateaus in quantum neural net- work training landscapes," Nature communica- tions 9, 4812 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Edward Grant, Leonard Wossnig, Mateusz Os- taszewski, and Marcello Benedetti, "An initial- ization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits," Quantum 3, 214 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Tyler Volkoff and Patrick J Coles, "Large gra- dients via correlation in random parameterized quantum circuits," Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 025008 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  46. L. Cincio, Y. Subaşı, A. T. Sornborger, and P. J. Coles, "Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap," New Journal of Physics 20, 113022 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  47. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, "A quantum approximate optimization algorithm," arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph] . · arXiv
  48. S. Hadfield, Z. Wang, B. O'Gorman, E. G. Ri- effel, D. Venturelli, and R. Biswas, "From the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to a quantum alternating operator ansatz," Algo- rithms 12, 34 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  49. S. Lloyd, "Quantum approximate optimization is computationally universal," arXiv:1812.11075 [quant-ph] . · arXiv
  50. Z. Wang, S. Hadfield, Z. Jiang, and E. G. Rieffel, "Quantum approximate optimization algorithm for MaxCut: A fermionic view," Phys. Rev. A 97, 022304 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  51. L. Zhou, S.-T. Wang, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, "Quantum approximate optimiza- tion algorithm: performance, mechanism, and implementation on near-term devices," Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  52. G. E. Crooks, "Performance of the quan- tum approximate optimization algorithm on the maximum cut problem," arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08419 (2018) . · arXiv
  53. J. M. Kübler, A. Arrasmith, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, "An adaptive optimizer for measurement- frugal variational algorithms," Quantum 4, 263 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Andrew Arrasmith, Lukasz Cincio, Rolando D Somma, and Patrick J Coles, "Operator sam- pling for shot-frugal optimization in variational algorithms," arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06252 (2020). · arXiv
  55. Ryan Sweke, Frederik Wilde, Johannes Meyer, Maria Schuld, Paul K Fährmann, Barthélémy Meynard-Piganeau, and Jens Eisert, "Stochas- tic gradient descent for hybrid quantum-classical optimization," Quantum 4, 314 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  56. K. Mitarai, M. Negoro, M. Kitagawa, and K. Fu- jii, "Quantum circuit learning," Phys. Rev. A 98, 032309 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  57. M. Schuld, V. Bergholm, C. Gogolin, J. Izaac, and N. Killoran, "Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware," Phys. Rev. A 99, 032331 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  58. A. Harrow and J. Napp, "Low-depth gradient measurements can improve convergence in vari- ational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms," Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 140502 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Kunal Sharma, Sumeet Khatri, Marco Cerezo, and Patrick Coles, "Noise resilience of variational quantum compiling," New Journal of Physics 22, 043006 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  60. K. Temme, S. Bravyi, and J. M. Gambetta, "Er- ror mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits," Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  61. Y. He and H. Guo, "The boundary effects of transverse field ising model," Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2017, 093101 (2017). · DOI
  62. D. W. Berry, G. Ahokas, R. Cleve, and B. C. Sanders, "Efficient quantum algorithms for simu- lating sparse Hamiltonians," Communications in Mathematical Physics 270, 359-371 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Y. Atia and D. Aharonov, "Fast-forwarding of hamiltonians and exponentially precise measure- ments," Nature communications 8, 1572 (2017). · DOI
  64. X. Xu, J. Sun, S. Endo, Y. Li, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, "Variational algorithms for linear algebra," Science Bulletin 66, 2181-2188 (2021). · DOI
  65. H.-Y. Huang, K. Bharti, and P. Rebentrost, "Near-term quantum algorithms for linear sys- tems of equations with regression loss functions," New Journal of Physics 23, 113021 (2021). · DOI
  66. M. Szegedy, "Quantum speed-up of markov chain based algorithms," in Proceedings of the 45th An- nual IEEE Symposium on FOCS. (IEEE, 2004) pp. 32-41. · DOI
  67. D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, and R. Kothari, "Hamiltonian simulation with nearly optimal de- pendence on all parameters," in Proceedings of the 56th Symposium on Foundations of Com- puter Science (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  68. J. C. Garcia-Escartin and P. Chamorro-Posada, "Swap test and Hong-Ou-Mandel effect are equivalent," Phys. Rev. A 87, 052330 (2013). · DOI
  69. M. J. D. Powell, "A fast algorithm for nonlin- early constrained optimization calculations," in Numerical analysis (Springer, 1978) pp. 144-157. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bravo-Prieto, C., LaRose, R., Cerezo, M., Subasi, Y., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
1188-1188
ISSN
2521-327X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034033217
Cited by
284
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
20.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (#89233218CNA000001)
  • Office of Science (89233218CNA000001)
  • National Nuclear Security Administration (89233218C-NA000001)
  • Advanced Scientific Computing Research (89233218CNA000001)
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development (89233218CNA000001)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (89233218CNA 000001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
variational quantum linear solver, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, near-term quantum devices, termination conditions, condition number, cost function estimation, quantum circuit depth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review