The DOI matches its DataCite record; 65 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula
Open accessAbstract
Through multi-agent competition, the simple objective of hide-and-seek, and standard reinforcement learning algorithms at scale, we find that agents create a self-supervised autocurriculum inducing multiple distinct rounds of emergent strategy, many of which require sophisticated tool use and coordination. We find clear evidence of six emergent phases in agent strategy in our environment, each of which creates a new pressure for the opposing team to adapt; for instance, agents learn to build multi-object shelters using moveable boxes which in turn leads to agents discovering that they can overcome obstacles using ramps. We further provide evidence that multi-agent competition may scale better with increasing environment complexity and leads to behavior that centers around far more human-relevant skills than other self-supervised reinforcement learning methods such as intrinsic motivation. Finally, we propose transfer and fine-tuning as a way to quantitatively evaluate targeted capabilities, and we compare hide-and-seek agents to both intrinsic motivation and random initialization baselines in a suite of domain-specific intelligence tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Baker et al. (2019) showed that even a simple game of hide and seek can lead to sophisticated tool use and coordination by MARL agents.”
From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (2025) · cites this paper as Baker et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Agents develop exploitative strategies (Baker et al., 2019), learn deception via theory-ofmind (Schulz et al., 2023), and discover betrayal without explicit training (Aitchison et al., 2021) -eluding threat models predicated on an identifiable adversary.”
From Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Baker et al., 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Consequently, we used the PPO agent in Experiments III and IV, as PPO is a competent agent used by OpenAI [32].”
From Playtesting: What is Beyond Personas (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · cited 4×
“[75] Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber.”
MethodInfluentialReinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2004.842673 · Cited by 25,268
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612 · cited 2×
“[30] David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George Van Den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al.”
BackgroundMethodProximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · cited 4×
“PPO [58], a policy gradient variant, penalizes large changes to the policy to prevent training instabilities.”
BackgroundInfluentialMuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control
Todorov, E., Erez, T., & Tassa, Y. (2012) · 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6386109 · Cited by 4,767 · cited 2×
“[57] Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa.”
BackgroundMethodArms races between and within species
Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0081 · Cited by 2,214 · cited 2×
“The vast amount of complexity and diversity on Earth evolved due to co-evolution and competition between organisms, directed by natural selection [5].”
BackgroundHigh-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation
Schulman, J., Moritz, P., Levine, S., Jordan, M., & Abbeel, P. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02438 · Cited by 2,103 · cited 3×
“We use Generalized Advantage Estimation [3] with horizon length H to estimate the advantage function.”
BackgroundMethodTemporal difference learning and TD-Gammon
Tesauro, G. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/203330.203343 · Cited by 1,618 · cited 3×
“In the context of multi-agent RL, [7], [30], [9], [13] and [10] used self-play with deep RL techniques to achieve super-human performance in Backgammon, Go, Dota, Capture-the-Flag and Starcraft, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodConcrete Problems in AI Safety
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06565 · Cited by 1,314
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Kelsey R Allen, Kevin A Smith, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. The tools challenge: Rapid trial-anderror learning in physical problem solving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09620 , 2019. · arXiv
- Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 , 2016. · arXiv
- Rene Baillargeon and Susan Carey. Core cognition and beyond: The acquisition of physical and numerical knowledge. In In S. Pauen (Ed.), Early Childhood Development and Later Outcome , pp. 33-65. University Press, 2012.
- Trapit Bansal, Jakub Pachocki, Szymon Sidor, Ilya Sutskever, and Igor Mordatch. Emergent complexity via multi-agent competition. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
- Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards, Amos Storkey, and Oleg Klimov. Exploration by random network distillation. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019b.
- Nick Haber, Damian Mrowca, Stephanie Wang, Li F Fei-Fei, and Daniel L Yamins. Learning to play with intrinsically-motivated, self-aware agents. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 8388-8399, 2018.
- Max Jaderberg, Valentin Dalibard, Simon Osindero, Wojciech M Czarnecki, Jeff Donahue, Ali Razavi, Oriol Vinyals, Tim Green, Iain Dunning, Karen Simonyan, et al. Population based training of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.09846 , 2017. · arXiv
- Ryan Lowe, Yi Wu, Aviv Tamar, Jean Harb, Pieter Abbeel, and Igor Mordatch. Multi-agent actorcritic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 6379-6390, 2017.
- Deepak Pathak, Pulkit Agrawal, Alexei A Efros, and Trevor Darrell. Curiosity-driven exploration by self-supervised prediction. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 2778-2787, 2017.
- Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Rob Fergus, et al. Learning multiagent communication with backpropagation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 2244-2252, 2016.
- Larry Yaeger. Computational genetics, physiology, metabolism, neural systems, learning, vision, and behavior or poly world: Life in a new context. In SANTA FE INSTITUTE STUDIES IN THE SCIENCES OF COMPLEXITY-PROCEEDINGS VOLUME, volume 17, pp. 263-263. ADDISON-WESLEY PUBLISHING CO, 1994.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Self-citationA Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges
Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3140175 · Cited by 2,046
“Hide and Seek is a simple yet effective simulation environment for multi-agent work that uses visual representations of objects and scenes from an egocentric perspective [218]–[221].”
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey
Gronauer, S., & Diepold, K. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-09996-w · Cited by 957
Unity: A General Platform for Intelligent Agents
Juliani, A., Berges, V.-P., Teng, E., Cohen, A., Harper, J., Elion, C., Goy, C., Gao, Y., Henry, H., Mattar, M., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.02627 · Cited by 626
“The features of the toolkit include a set of example environments, state of the art RL algorithms Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) (Haarnoja et al., 2018) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) (Schulman et al., 2017), the IL algorithms Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning (GAIL) (Ho and Ermon, 2016) and Behavioral Clonin…”
BackgroundInfluentialDirect Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks
Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.002 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, B., Kanitscheider, I., Markov, T., Wu, Y., Powell, G., McGrew, B., & Mordatch, I.
- Affiliations
- OpenAI (United States) (US)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1909.07528
- OpenAlex
- W2973525135
- Semantic Scholar
- 33a2c0f3b9a0adc452a13d53f950c0c3c4abb11b
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Keywords
- multi-agent competition, hide and seek, multi-agent coordination, intrinsic motivation, intelligence tests, environmental complexity, overcoming obstacles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
