PreprintCited by 5Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

A Privacy-Preserving Architecture for the Protection of Adolescents in Online Social Networks

Open access
Charalambous, Markos, Papagiannis, Petros, Papasavva, Antonis, Leonidou, Pantelitsa, Constaninou, Rafael, Terzidou, Lia, Christophides, Theodoros, Nicolaou, Pantelis +3 more·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Online social networks (OSN) constitute an integral part of people's every day social activity. Specifically, mainstream OSNs such as Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook are especially prominent in adolescents' lives for communicating with other people online, expressing and entertain themselves, and finding information. However, adolescents face a significant number of threats when using online platforms. Some of these threats include aggressive behavior and cyberbullying, sexual grooming, false news and fake activity, radicalization, and exposure of personal information and sensitive content. There is a pressing need for parental control tools and Internet content filtering techniques to protect the vulnerable groups that use online platforms. Existing parental control tools occasionally violate the privacy of adolescents, leading them to use other communication channels to avoid moderation. In this work, we design and implement a user-centric Family Advice Suite with Guardian Avatars aiming at preserving the privacy of the individuals towards their custodians and towards the advice tool itself. Moreover, we present a systematic process for designing and developing state of the art techniques and a system architecture to prevent minors' exposure to numerous risks and dangers while using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube on a browser.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2007.12038

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charalambous, M., Papagiannis, P., Papasavva, A., Leonidou, P., Constaninou, R., Terzidou, L., Christophides, T., Nicolaou, P., Theofanis, O., Kalatzantonakis, G., & Sirivianos, M.
Affiliations
  • Cyprus University of Technology (CY)
  • Cyprus Research and Innovation Center (Cyprus) (CY)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
48-57
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043852904
Cited by
4
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (691025)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
adolescent privacy, social networking sites, parental control, content filtering, cyberbullying, sexual grooming, radicalization, fake news, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, child online safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review