Cited by 75Child Development and Digital TechnologyPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Circle of Trust: A New Approach to Mobile Online Safety for Families

Ghosh, Arup Kumar, Hughes, Charles E., Wisniewski, Pamela J.·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Traditional parental control applications designed to protect children and teens from online risks do so through parental restrictions and privacy-invasive monitoring. We propose a new approach to adolescent online safety that aims to strike a balance between a teen's privacy and their online safety through active communication and fostering trust between parents and children. We designed and developed an Android "app" called Circle of Trust and conducted a mixed methods user study of 17 parent-child pairs to understand their perceptions about the app. Using a within-subjects experimental design, we found that parents and children significantly preferred our new app design over existing parental control apps in terms of perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioral intent to use. By applying a lens of Value Sensitive Design to our interview data, we uncovered that parents and children who valued privacy, trust, freedom, and balance of power preferred our app over traditional apps. However, those who valued transparency and control preferred the status quo. Overall, we found that our app was better suited for teens than for younger children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3313831.3376747

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents are often the primary stakeholders who care the most about their teens' safety and are frequently responsible for making decisions about online risk management, monitoring, and protection.

    “Parents are often the primary stakeholders who care the most about their teens' safety and are frequently responsible for making decisions about online risk management, monitoring, and protection [7, 8, 40, 46, 90].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghosh, A. K., Hughes, C. E., & Wisniewski, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Jacksonville State University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-04-21
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W3029837607
Cited by
75
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
23.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
The U.S. National Science Foundation (CHS-1844881)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
parent-child trust, value-sensitive design, mobile application design, perceived usefulness and ease of use, user acceptance, children's online risks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review