PreprintCited by 63Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotics and Automated Systems

iGibson 2.0: Object-Centric Simulation for Robot Learning of Everyday Household Tasks

Open access
Li, Chengshu, Xia, Fei, Martín-Martín, Roberto, Lingelbach, Michael, Srivastava, Sanjana, Shen, Bokui, Vainio, Kent, Gokmen, Cem +8 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Recent research in embodied AI has been boosted by the use of simulation environments to develop and train robot learning approaches. However, the use of simulation has skewed the attention to tasks that only require what robotics simulators can simulate: motion and physical contact. We present iGibson 2.0, an open-source simulation environment that supports the simulation of a more diverse set of household tasks through three key innovations. First, iGibson 2.0 supports object states, including temperature, wetness level, cleanliness level, and toggled and sliced states, necessary to cover a wider range of tasks. Second, iGibson 2.0 implements a set of predicate logic functions that map the simulator states to logic states like Cooked or Soaked. Additionally, given a logic state, iGibson 2.0 can sample valid physical states that satisfy it. This functionality can generate potentially infinite instances of tasks with minimal effort from the users. The sampling mechanism allows our scenes to be more densely populated with small objects in semantically meaningful locations. Third, iGibson 2.0 includes a virtual reality (VR) interface to immerse humans in its scenes to collect demonstrations. As a result, we can collect demonstrations from humans on these new types of tasks, and use them for imitation learning. We evaluate the new capabilities of iGibson 2.0 to enable robot learning of novel tasks, in the hope of demonstrating the potential of this new simulator to support new research in embodied AI. iGibson 2.0 and its new dataset are publicly available at http://svl.stanford.edu/igibson/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2108.03272

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In OMNIGIBSON, the authors trade off rendering speed for visual realism (ray-traced), reaching around 60 fps for a house scene of around 60 objects (vs. around 100 fps in iGibson 2.0).

    “In OMNIGIBSON, we trade off rendering speed for visual realism (ray-traced), reaching around 60 fps for a house scene of around 60 objects (v.s. around 100 fps in iGibson 2.0 [59]).”

    From BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation (2024) · cites this paper as [59]

    The citation is attached to the iGibson 2.0 speed comparison, not to OMNIGIBSON’s reported 60 fps. In A.4 (p. 19), the performance table gives a mean of 125 for iGibson 2.0; 100 is the mean for iGibson 1.0. The benchmark setup is described in A.4 (p. 18). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Realistic simulation of the diverse activities in BEHAVIOR-1K is beyond the capability of iGibson 2.0.

    “BEHAVIOR-100 is implemented in iGibson 2.0 [59]; however, realistic simulation of the diverse activities in BEHAVIOR-1K is beyond the capability of iGibson 2.0.”

    From BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation (2024) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Limitations and Future Work section (p. 20) says iGibson 2.0 cannot scalably simulate flexible materials or accurately model human behavior, preventing tasks such as folding laundry, making beds, and elderly care. It does not assess BEHAVIOR-1K or establish that its diverse activities as a whole exceed the simulator’s capabilities. In the citing sentence, the citation is attached to the preceding BEHAVIOR-100 clause, not explicitly to this broader conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • OMNIGIBSON runs at a comparable speed to iGibson 2.0 under similar settings, but with much higher rendering quality due to ray-tracing.

    “OMNIGIBSON runs at a comparable speed to previous works like iGibson 2.0 [59] under similar settings, but with much higher rendering quality thanks to ray-tracing.”
  • OMNIGIBSON extends the infrastructure of extended object states and logical predicates from iGibson 2.0 to accommodate the diversity and realism of BEHAVIOR-1K.

    “OMNIGIBSON extends the infrastructure of extended object states and logical predicates from iGibson 2.0 [59] to accommodate the diversity and realism of BEHAVIOR-1K.”
  • RoboCasa supports photorealistic rendering and multiple robot embodiments.

    “RoboCasa is one of the few frameworks to feature photorealistic rendering [21, 40, 27, 10, 6] and multiple robot embodiments [21, 26, 27, 6, 34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [35][35] G. A. Miller. WordNet: a lexical database. Communications of the ACM , 38(11):39-41, 1995. -
  2. [42][42] K. Ehsani, W. Han, A. Herrasti, E. VanderBilt, L. Weihs, E. Kolve, A. Kembhavi, and R. Mottaghi. Manipulathor: A framework for visual object manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4497-4506, 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Xia, F., Martín-Martín, R., Lingelbach, M., Srivastava, S., Shen, B., Vainio, K., Gokmen, C., Dharan, G., Jain, T., Kurenkov, A., Liu, C. K., Gweon, H., Wu, J., Fei-Fei, L., & Savarese, S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3190215236
Cited by
58
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (W911NF-15-1-0479)
  • Office of Naval Research (N000141612127, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
Keywords
robot learning, housework, simulation environment, object state, first-order logic, imitation learning, embodied AI, open-source simulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review