PreprintCited by 5Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Games

Procedural Generalization by Planning with Self-Supervised World Models

Open access
Anand, Ankesh, Walker, Jacob, Li, Yazhe, Vértes, Eszter, Schrittwieser, Julian, Ozair, Sherjil, Weber, Théophane, Hamrick, Jessica B.·2021·arXiv

Abstract

One of the key promises of model-based reinforcement learning is the ability to generalize using an internal model of the world to make predictions in novel environments and tasks. However, the generalization ability of model-based agents is not well understood because existing work has focused on model-free agents when benchmarking generalization. Here, we explicitly measure the generalization ability of model-based agents in comparison to their model-free counterparts. We focus our analysis on MuZero (Schrittwieser et al., 2020), a powerful model-based agent, and evaluate its performance on both procedural and task generalization. We identify three factors of procedural generalization -- planning, self-supervised representation learning, and procedural data diversity -- and show that by combining these techniques, we achieve state-of-the art generalization performance and data efficiency on Procgen (Cobbe et al., 2019). However, we find that these factors do not always provide the same benefits for the task generalization benchmarks in Meta-World (Yu et al., 2019), indicating that transfer remains a challenge and may require different approaches than procedural generalization. Overall, we suggest that building generalizable agents requires moving beyond the single-task, model-free paradigm and towards self-supervised model-based agents that are trained in rich, procedural, multi-task environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2111.01587

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generalising to new rewards (as is necessary for Meta-World) is not currently as amenable to MBRL approaches.

    “although the performance there is not as impressive, showing that generalising to new rewards (as is necessary for Meta-World) is not currently as amenable to MBRL approaches.”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Anand et al. (2021)

  • Very little work has applied MBRL to ZSG benchmarks, with Anand et al. (2021) being an initial example.

    “Very little work has applied MBRL to ZSG benchmarks, with Anand et al. (2021) being an initial example.”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Anand et al. (2021)

  • Anand et al. (2021) is the first example investigating how well standard model-based reinforcement learning approaches generalise.

    “Anand et al. (2021) is the first example investigating how well standard MBRL approaches generalise”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Anand et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

16 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anand, A., Walker, J., Li, Y., Vértes, E., Schrittwieser, J., Ozair, S., Weber, T., & Hamrick, J. B.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209153580
Cited by
5
References
75
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
model-based reinforcement learning, MuZero, planning, task generalization, transfer learning, Procgen, Meta-World, representation learning, data efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review