The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher
Open accessAbstract
Language modelling provides a step towards intelligent communication systems by harnessing large repositories of written human knowledge to better predict and understand the world. In this paper, we present an analysis of Transformer-based language model performance across a wide range of model scales -- from models with tens of millions of parameters up to a 280 billion parameter model called Gopher. These models are evaluated on 152 diverse tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance across the majority. Gains from scale are largest in areas such as reading comprehension, fact-checking, and the identification of toxic language, but logical and mathematical reasoning see less benefit. We provide a holistic analysis of the training dataset and model's behaviour, covering the intersection of model scale with bias and toxicity. Finally we discuss the application of language models to AI safety and the mitigation of downstream harms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“LLMs are particularly vulnerable to performance degradation from low-quality data containing spam, noise, and duplicates [61,62].”
From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [61]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This limitation stems from the context window of LLMs, which today is limited to at most 2048 tokens (i.e. about 1500 words) in state-of-the-art models [78,86].”
From Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry Professionals (2023) · cites this paper as [86]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Chinchilla stored a higher-precision copy of the weights in the sharded optimiser state.”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al. (2021)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example given the Gopher (Rae et al., 2021) compute budget of 5.76 × 10 23 FLOPs, their parametric loss function fitted on MassiveWeb predicts an optimal allocation of 40 billion parameters.”
From Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Small Gopher models also do not perform above random until scaled up to the largest model of 5 · 10 23 training FLOPs (280B parameters), for which performance jumps to more than 20% above random (Rae et al., 2021).”
From Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For GPT-3, Gopher, and Chinchilla, models of ∼ 10 22 training FLOPs ( ∼ 10B parameters) or smaller do not perform better than guessing on average over all the topics, scaling up to 3-5 · 10 23 training FLOPs (70B-280B parameters) enables performance to substantially surpass random.”
From Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The scaling law from which our model is derived applies to dense transformers following a GPT-3 architecture (Hoffmann et al. 2022; Rae et al. 2021).”
From Algorithmic progress in language models (2024) · cites this paper as Rae et al. 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Chinchilla outperformed the much larger Gopher [Rae et al., 2021], GPT-3 [Brown et al., 2020], and others [Smith et al., 2022] across a broad benchmark suite”
From Training Compute-Optimal Transformer Models: A Review of Scaling Laws, Allocation, and Practice (2026) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In Appendix C, we reproduce the IsoFLOP analysis on two additional datasets: C4 (Raffel et al., 2020a) and GitHub code (Rae et al., 2021). In both cases we reach the similar conclusion that model size and number of training tokens should be scaled in equal proportions.”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“in the analysis of mod- els trained on the same corpus in Rae et al. (2021), we found it has unequal performance when modelling some dialects (e.g., African American English).”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al. (2021)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The same dataset is used as in Rae et al. (2021).”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al. (2021)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Notably, the 70-billion parameter Chinchilla model (Hoffmann et al., 2022) outperforms the 280-billion parameter Gopher model (Rae et al., 2021) while using a similar compute budget by being trained on four times more data.”
From Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Following this trend, modern language models often have hundreds of billions of parameters (Brown et al., 2020; Rae et al., 2021; Zeng et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2021).”
From Petals: Collaborative Inference and Fine-tuning of Large Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The TruthfulQA benchmark (Lin et al., 2021) showed that GPT-3 models were more likely to mimic human falsehoods as they got larger, though Rae et al. (2021) later showed on a multiple-choice version that scaling Gopher to 280B enabled emergent performance substantially better than random.”
From Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“| GitHub | 0.53 | 0.47 |”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Rae et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Evaluation using GPT-judge is standard practice on TruthfulQA (Nakano et al. (2021); Rae et al. (2021); Askell et al. (2021)).”
From Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model (2023) · cites this paper as Rae et al. (2021)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [10]10. O.-M. Camburu, T. Rocktäschel, T. Lukasiewicz, and P. Blunsom. e-SNLI: Natural language inference with natural language explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01193, 2018. - Y. T. Cao and H. Daumé. Toward gender-inclusive coreference resolution: An analysis of gender and bias throughout the machine learning lifecyle. Computational Linguistics, pages 1-47, 2021. - N. Carlini, C. Liu, Ú. Erlingsson, J. Kos, and D. Song. The secret sharer: Evaluating and testing unintended memorization in neural networks. In 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), pages 267-284, 2019. - N. Carlini, F. Tramer, E. Wallace, M. Jagielski, A. Herbert-Voss, K. Lee, A. Roberts, T. Brown, D. Song, U. Erlingsson, A. Oprea, and C. Raffel. Extracting training data from large language models, 2021. - N. Chater. The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(2):273-302, 1999. - H. Chen, X. Liu, D. Yin, and J. Tang. A survey on dialogue systems: Recent advances and new frontiers. Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 19(2):25-35, 2017. - T. Chen, I. Goodfellow, and J. Shlens. Net2net: Accelerating learning via knowledge transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05641, 2015. - P. Christiano, B. Shlegeris, and D. Amodei. Supervising strong learners by amplifying weak experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.08575, 2018. - D. Coyle and A. Weller. 'Explaining' machine learning reveals policy challenges. Science, 368(6498): 1433-1434, 2020. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.13138 · Cited by 4,083
Large language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590
“To evaluate toxicity degeneration, we adapt the methodology used in Welbl et al. (2021); Rae et al. (2021).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationChain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505
“For the traditional few-shot prompting method used in Brown et al. (2020), it works poorly on tasks that require reasoning abilities, and often does not improve substantially with increasing language model scale (Rae et al., 2021).”
InfluentialA Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Dong, Z., Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Min, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3 · Cited by 2,093
Self-citationRecent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A. P. B., Nguyen, T. H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heintz, I., & Roth, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605943 · Cited by 1,387
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models
Ding, N., Qin, Y., Yang, G., Wei, F., Yang, Z., Su, Y., Hu, S., Chen, Y., Chan, C.-M., Chen, W., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00626-4 · Cited by 1,191
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264
Self-citationCompetition-level code generation with AlphaCode
Li, Y., Choi, D., Chung, J., Kushman, N., Schrittwieser, J., Leblond, R., Eccles, T., Keeling, J., Gimeno, F., Dal Lago, A., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq1158 · Cited by 1,043
Self-citationSelf-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Wang, X., Wei, J., Schuurmans, D., Le, Q., Chi, E., Narang, S., Chowdhery, A., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11171 · Cited by 829
“Although language models have demonstrated remarkable success across a range of NLP tasks, their ability to demonstrate reasoning is often seen as a limitation, which cannot be overcome solely by increasing model scale (Rae et al., 2021; BIG-bench collaboration, 2021, inter alia ).”
BackgroundFlamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning
Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., Lenc, K., Mensch, A., Millican, K., Reynolds, M., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1723 · Cited by 966
“In the short term, effective approaches include relying on prompting to mitigate any biases and harmful outputs [86].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
Lin, S., Hilton, J., & Evans, O. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.229 · Cited by 904
Taxonomy of Risks posed by Language Models
Weidinger, L., Uesato, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Huang, P.-S., Mellor, J., Glaese, A., Cheng, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533088 · Cited by 764
“Current state of the art LMs are primarily trained in English or Mandarin Chinese [30, 37, 54, 148, 160] and perform better in these compared to any other languages [196].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-main.45 · Cited by 682
Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics
Dalla-Torre, H., Gonzalez, L., Mendoza-Revilla, J., Lopez Carranza, N., Grzywaczewski, A. H., Oteri, F., Dallago, C., Trop, E., de Almeida, B. P., Sirelkhatim, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02523-z · Cited by 772
“Inspired by trends in NLP, where larger training datasets and model sizes have demonstrated improved performance 27 , we constructed transformer models with varying parameter sizes and datasets: (1) a 500-million-parameter model trained on sequences extracted from the human reference genome (‘Human…”
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Rozière, B., Gehring, J., Gloeckle, F., Sootla, S., Gat, I., Tan, X. E., Adi, Y., Liu, J., Sauvestre, R., Remez, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.12950 · Cited by 531
C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddings
Xiao, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, P., Muennighoff, N., Lian, D., & Nie, J.-Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657878 · Cited by 523
Role play with large language models
Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8 · Cited by 491
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
Huang, J., & Chang, K. C.-C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.67 · Cited by 428
Almanac — Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Medicine
Zakka, C., Shad, R., Chaurasia, A., Dalal, A. R., Kim, J. L., Moor, M., Fong, R., Phillips, C., Alexander, K., Ashley, E., et al. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2300068 · Cited by 424
A Survey on Large Language Models: Applications, Challenges, Limitations, and Practical UsagePreprint
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v1 · Cited by 475
GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model
Black, S., Biderman, S., Hallahan, E., Anthony, Q. G., Gao, L., Golding, L., He, H., Leahy, C., McDonell, K., Phang, J., et al. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bigscience-1.9 · Cited by 480
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05862 · Cited by 442
Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning
Rubin, O., Herzig, J., & Berant, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.191 · Cited by 374
Talking about Large Language Models
Shanahan, M. (2024) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3624724 · Cited by 381
Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels
Gao, L., Ma, X., Lin, J., & Callan, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.99 · Cited by 362
Bang, Y., Cahyawijaya, S., Lee, N., Dai, W., Su, D., Wilie, B., Lovenia, H., Ji, Z., Yu, T., Chung, W., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.04023 · Cited by 337
“Training data size affects language understanding and generation ability of LMs (Raffel et al., 2022; Cahyawijaya et al., 2021; Rae et al., 2021; Work-shop et al., 2022; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Hoff-mann et al., 2022).”
BackgroundLee, M., Liang, P., & Yang, Q. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502030 · Cited by 345
ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model
Huang, H., Zheng, O., Wang, D., Yin, J., Wang, Z., Ding, S., Yin, H., Xu, C., Yang, R., Zheng, Q., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/s41368-023-00239-y · Cited by 324
Can large language models reason about medical questions?
Liévin, V., Hother, C. E., Motzfeldt, A. G., & Winther, O. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100943 · Cited by 343
xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-3417 · Cited by 286
Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views
Jakesch, M., Bhat, A., Buschek, D., Zalmanson, L., & Naaman, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581196 · Cited by 265
“However, more cautious voices have also warned about the ethical and social risks of harm from large language models [100, 101], ranging from discrimination and exclusion [23, 54, 83] to misinformation [67, 75, 91, 106] and environmental [96] and socioeconomic harms [14].”
BackgroundEvaluating Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic HCI Research Data: a Case Study
Hämäläinen, P., Tavast, M., & Kunnari, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580688 · Cited by 248
Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them
Suzgun, M., Scales, N., Schärli, N., Gehrmann, S., Tay, Y., Chung, H. W., Chowdhery, A., Le, Q., Chi, E., Zhou, D., et al. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.824 · Cited by 253
Mirowski, P., Mathewson, K. W., Pittman, J., & Evans, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581225 · Cited by 240
Lai, V., Ngo, N., Pouran Ben Veyseh, A., Man, H., Dernoncourt, F., Bui, T., & Nguyen, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.878 · Cited by 233
Lai, V. D., Ngo, N. T., Veyseh, A. P. B., Man, H., Dernoncourt, F., Bui, T., & Nguyen, T. H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.05613 · Cited by 233
Text Classification via Large Language Models
Sun, X., Li, X., Li, J., Wu, F. Q., Guo, S., Zhang, T., & Wang, G. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.603 · Cited by 376
Self-citationAI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect
Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D., & King, S. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07856-5 · Cited by 233
What large language models know and what people think they know
Steyvers, M., Tejeda, H., Kumar, A., Belem, C., Karny, S., Hu, X., Mayer, L. W., & Smyth, P. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00976-7 · Cited by 209
The Nucleotide Transformer: Building and Evaluating Robust Foundation Models for Human Genomics
Dalla-Torre, H., Gonzalez, L., Mendoza Revilla, J., Lopez Carranza, N., Henryk Grywaczewski, A., Oteri, F., Dallago, C., Trop, E., De Almeida, B. P., Sirelkhatim, H., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.11.523679 · Cited by 680
Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
Ganguli, D., Hernandez, D., Lovitt, L., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Conerly, T., Dassarma, N., Drain, D., Elhage, N., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533229 · Cited by 207
Uncovering ChatGPT’s Capabilities in Recommender Systems
Dai, S., Shao, N., Zhao, H., Yu, W., Si, Z., Xu, C., Sun, Z., Zhang, X., & Xu, J. (2023) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3604915.3610646 · Cited by 298
Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model
Luccioni, A. S., Viguier, S., & Ligozat, A.-L. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.02001 · Cited by 378
“A few recent LLM papers reported the carbon footprint of model training, including notable models such as OPT175B [37], GPT-3 [28] and Gopher [29].”
BackgroundSocial Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems
Park, J. S., Popowski, L., Cai, C., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3526113.3545616 · Cited by 212
Drori, I., Zhang, S., Shuttleworth, R., Tang, L., Lu, A., Ke, E., Liu, K., Chen, L., Tran, S., Cheng, N., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2123433119 · Cited by 187
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2176 · Cited by 932
“The compute and energy cost for training large language models is substantial (Rae et al., 2021; Thoppilan et al., 2022) and rises with increasing model size.”
InfluentialSelf-citationAI chatbots not yet ready for clinical use.
Au Yeung, J., Kraljevic, Z., Luintel, A., Balston, A., Idowu, E., Dobson, R. J., & Teo, J. T. (2023) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1161098 · Cited by 176
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Kadavath, S., Conerly, T., Askell, A., Henighan, T., Drain, D., Perez, E., Schiefer, N., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., DasSarma, N., Tran-Johnson, E., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05221 · Cited by 187
Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicity
Zhuo, T. Y., Huang, Y., Chen, C., & Xing, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.12867 · Cited by 164
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v4 · Cited by 193
Karinshak, E., Liu, S. X., Park, J. S., & Hancock, J. T. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579592 · Cited by 167
Sui, Y., Zhou, M., Zhou, M., Han, S., & Zhang, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3616855.3635752 · Cited by 155
A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference
Chitty-Venkata, K. T., Mittal, S., Emani, M., Vishwanath, V., & Somani, A. K. (2023) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2023.102990 · Cited by 154
A comprehensive survey on pretrained foundation models: a history from BERT to ChatGPT
Zhou, C., Li, Q., Li, C., Yu, J., Liu, Y., Wang, G., Zhang, K., Ji, C., Yan, Q., He, L., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.09419 · Cited by 574
MathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language Models
Imani, S., Du, L., & Shrivastava, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.4 · Cited by 382
Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems
Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., Langosco, L., He, Z., Duan, Y., Carroll, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594033 · Cited by 149
“Before the current era of large language models (LLMs) [30, 36, 150, 172], few systems competently performed out-of-the-box on a range of natural language tasks [36].”
BackgroundIs GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?
Ding, B., Qin, C., Liu, L., Chia, Y. K., Li, B., Joty, S., & Bing, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.626 · Cited by 149
Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers
Ho, N., Schmid, L., & Yun, S.-Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.830 · Cited by 403
Can language models learn from explanations in context?
Lampinen, A., Dasgupta, I., Chan, S., Mathewson, K., Tessler, M., Creswell, A., McClelland, J., Wang, J., & Hill, F. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.38 · Cited by 142
Self-citationMultimodal Prompting with Missing Modalities for Visual Recognition
Lee, Y.-L., Tsai, Y.-H., Chiu, W.-C., & Lee, C.-Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01435 · Cited by 156
Large language models demonstrate the potential of statistical learning in language
Contreras Kallens, P., Kristensen‐McLachlan, R. D., & Christiansen, M. H. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13256 · Cited by 130
In Conversation with Artificial Intelligence: Aligning language Models with Human Values
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00606-x · Cited by 127
Self-citationSocial Dynamics of AI Support in Creative Writing
Gero, K. I., Long, T., & Chilton, L. B. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580782 · Cited by 129
Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality
Dziri, N., Lu, X., Sclar, M., Li, X. (., Jiang, L., Lin, B. Y., Welleck, S., West, P., Bhagavatula, C., Bras, R. L., et al. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-3081 · Cited by 335
“Reasoning abilities in Transformers Recently, Transformers [8, 41, 40, 13, 12, 45, 55, 56] have demonstrated impressive reasoning abilities across a wide range of tasks, even outperforming humans in certain cases [60, 24, 11, 65].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFaith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality
Dziri, N., Lu, X., Sclar, M., Li, X. L., Jiang, L., Lin, B. Y., West, P., Bhagavatula, C., Bras, R. L., Hwang, J. D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 124
Self-citationWhat Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us about Human Language Acquisition
Warstadt, A., & Bowman, S. R. (2022) · Algebraic Structures in Natural Language · doi:10.1201/9781003205388-2 · Cited by 111
Ong, J. C. L., Seng, B. J. J., Law, J. Z. F., Low, L. L., Kwa, A. L. H., Giacomini, K. M., & Ting, D. S. W. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101356 · Cited by 111
On the creativity of large language models
Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02127-3 · Cited by 113
Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language Models
Dhillon, P. S., Molaei, S., Li, J., Golub, M., Zheng, S., & Robert, L. P. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642134 · Cited by 111
Defining the Scope of AI Regulations
Schuett, J. (2019) · Law Innovation and Technology · doi:10.1080/17579961.2023.2184135 · Cited by 186
Large Language Models are few(1)-shot Table Reasoners
Chen, W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.83 · Cited by 170
A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets
Laskar, M. T. R., Bari, M. S., Rahman, M., Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Joty, S., & Huang, J. X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.29 · Cited by 160
KICGPT: Large Language Model with Knowledge in Context for Knowledge Graph Completion
Wei, Y., Huang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Kwok, J. T.-Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.580 · Cited by 143
xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04517 · Cited by 299
From Word Embeddings to Pre-Trained Language Models: A State-of-the-Art Walkthrough
Mars, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12178805 · Cited by 91
Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation
Sachan, D., Lewis, M., Joshi, M., Aghajanyan, A., Yih, W.-T., Pineau, J., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.249 · Cited by 90
Zhang, C., Xu, Q., Yu, Y., Zhou, G., Zeng, K., Chang, F., & Ding, K. (2024) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102883 · Cited by 101
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Wu, J., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741 · Cited by 111
The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerations
Solaiman, I. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3593981 · Cited by 90
“I’m sorry to hear that”: Finding new biases in language models with a holistic descriptor dataset
Smith, E. M., Hall, M., Kambadur, M., Presani, E., & Williams, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.625 · Cited by 97
Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss Perspective
Du, Z., Zeng, A., Dong, Y., & Tang, J. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-1683 · Cited by 76
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Chaudhari, S., Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., Deshpande, A., & Castro da Silva, B. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3743127 · Cited by 92
Iteratively Prompt Pre-trained Language Models for Chain of Thought
Wang, B., Deng, X. B., & Sun, H. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.174 · Cited by 123
Astronomia ex machina: a history, primer and outlook on neural networks in astronomy
Smith, M. J., & Geach, J. E. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.221454 · Cited by 91
Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Ye, J., & Kong, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.79 · Cited by 158
A taxonomy and review of generalization research in NLP
Hupkes, D., Giulianelli, M., Dankers, V., Artetxe, M., Elazar, Y., Pimentel, T., Christodoulopoulos, C., Lasri, K., Saphra, N., Sinclair, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00729-y · Cited by 145
Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: a Theoretical Perspective
Feng, G., Zhang, B., Gu, Y., Ye, H., He, D., & Wang, L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.15408 · Cited by 69
“Among them, the autoregressive paradigm has gained arguably the most popularity [45, 8, 40, 62, 52, 13, 46, 48], based on the philosophy that all different tasks can be uniformly treated as sequence generation problems.”
BackgroundA Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning
Lu, P., Qiu, L., Yu, W., Welleck, S., & Chang, K.-W. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.817 · Cited by 145
The BigScience ROOTS Corpus: A 1.6TB Composite Multilingual Dataset
Laurençon, H., Saulnier, L., Wang, T., Akiki, C., del Moral, A. V., Scao, T. L., Von Werra, L., Mou, C., Ponferrada, E. G., Nguyen, H., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.03915 · Cited by 93
Generative Artificial Intelligence for Software Engineering—A Research Agenda
Nguyen‐Duc, A., Cabrero‐Daniel, B., Przybylek, A., Arora, C., Khanna, D., Herda, T., Rafiq, U., Melegati, J., Guerra, E., Kemell, K., et al. (2025) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.70005 · Cited by 60
Deep lexical hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural language.
Cutler, A., & Condon, D. M. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000443 · Cited by 71
Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model
Li, K., Patel, O., Viégas, F., Pfister, H., & Wattenberg, M. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-1797 · Cited by 117
“Evaluation using GPT-judge is standard practice on TruthfulQA (Nakano et al. (2021); Rae et al. (2021); Askell et al. (2021)).”
MethodFine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learners
Scialom, T., Chakrabarty, T., & Muresan, S. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.410 · Cited by 118
Linguistically inspired roadmap for building biologically reliable protein language models
Vu, M. H., Akbar, R., Robert, P. A., Świątczak, B., Sandve, G. K., Greiff, V., & Haug, D. T. T. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00637-1 · Cited by 59
Hadi, M. U., Al-Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., Zafar, A., Shaikh, M. B., Akhtar, N., Hassan, S. Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.23589741.v3 · Cited by 71
Petals: Collaborative Inference and Fine-tuning of Large Models
Borzunov, A., Baranchuk, D., Dettmers, T., Riabinin, M., Belkada, Y., Chumachenko, A., Samygin, P., & Raffel, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 3: System Demonstrations) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.54 · Cited by 52
Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs
Chen, J., & Yang, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.738 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Rae, J. W., Borgeaud, S., Cai, T., Millican, K., Hoffmann, J., Song, F., Aslanides, J., Henderson, S., Ring, R., Young, S., Rutherford, E., Hennigan, T., Menick, J., Cassirer, A., Powell, R., Driessche, G. V. D., Hendricks, L. A., Rauh, M., Huang, P.-S., Glaese, A., Welbl, J., Dathathri, S., Huang, S., Uesato, J., Mellor, J., Higgins, I., Creswell, A., McAleese, N., Wu, A., Elsen, E., Jayakumar, S., Buchatskaya, E., Budden, D., Sutherland, E., Simonyan, K., Paganini, M., Sifre, L., Martens, L., Li, X. L., Kuncoro, A., Nematzadeh, A., Gribovskaya, E., Donato, D., Lazaridou, A., Mensch, A., Lespiau, J.-B., Tsimpoukelli, M., Grigorev, N., Fritz, D., Sottiaux, T., Pajarskas, M., Pohlen, T., Gong, Z., Toyama, D., d'Autume, C. D. M., Li, Y., Terzi, T., Mikulik, V., Babuschkin, I., Clark, A., Casas, D. D. L., Guy, A., Jones, C., Bradbury, J., Johnson, M., Hechtman, B., Weidinger, L., Gabriel, I., Isaac, W., Lockhart, E., Osindero, S., Rimell, L., Dyer, C., Vinyals, O., Ayoub, K., Stanway, J., Bennett, L., Hassabis, D., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Irving, G.
- ORCID
- Hendricks, Lisa Anne
- Rauh, Maribeth
- Huang, Po-Sen
- Dathathri, Sumanth
- Huang, Saffron
- Higgins, Irina
- Creswell, Antonia
- Budden, David
- Simonyan, Karen
- Paganini, Michela
- Lazaridou, Angeliki
- Mensch, Arthur
- Li, Yujia
- Mikulik, Vladimir
- Babuschkin, Igor
- Johnson, Matthew
- Weidinger, Laura
- Gabriel, Iason
- Vinyals, Oriol
- Ayoub, Kareem
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2112.11446
- OpenAlex
- W4226146865
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 39
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- gophers, large language models, model scaling, transformer models, reading comprehension, fact-checking, toxic language detection, bias in language models, AI safety, mathematical reasoning, training data analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
