CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5Advanced Condensed Matter PhysicsThermal properties of materialsThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

Simultaneous measurement of specific heat and thermal conductivity in pulsed magnetic fields

Open access
Nomoto, Tetsuya, Zhong, Chengchao, Kageyama, Hiroshi, Suzuki, Yoko, Jaime, Marcelo, Hashimoto, Yoshiaki, Katsumoto, Shingo, Matsuyama, Naofumi +5 more·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2302.01627arXiv 2302.01627
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We report an experimental setup for simultaneously measuring specific heat and thermal conductivity in feedback-controlled pulsed magnetic fields of 50 msec duration at cryogenic temperatures. A stabilized magnetic field pulse obtained by the feedback control, which dramatically improves the thermal stability of the setup and sample, is used in combination with the flash method to obtain absolute values of thermal properties up to 37.2 T in the 2 K to 16 K temperature range. We describe the experimental setup and demonstrate the performance of the present method with measurements on single crystal samples of the geometrically frustrated quantum spin-dimer system SrCu$_2$(BO$_3$)$_2$. Our proof-of-principle results show excellent agreement with data taken using a standard steady-state method, confirming the validity and convenience of the present approach.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper reports an experimental setup that combines the flash method with feedback-controlled flat-top pulsed magnetic fields to simultaneously measure specific heat and thermal conductivity at cryogenic temperatures. Proof-of-principle measurements on SrCu₂(BO₃)₂ up to 37.2 T agree with steady-state literature data.

Key findings

  • Simultaneous extraction of thermal diffusivity, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity from a single time-temperature curve was demonstrated in pulsed fields up to 37.2 T over 2–16 K, using a 50 ms flat-top field stabilized to ±0.005 T.
  • At zero field (setup 1), the half-time was \(t_{1/2}=5.53\) ms, giving \(\alpha=52.0\) mm² s⁻¹, \(C=6.59\) J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹, and \(\kappa=4.04\) W K⁻¹ m⁻¹; curve fitting gave \(\alpha=51.8\) mm² s⁻¹ and Biot number \(Y=0.0658\).
  • At 37.22 T and 3.26 K, the half-time method gave \(\alpha=29.0\) mm² s⁻¹, while curve fitting gave \(\alpha=27.9\) mm² s⁻¹ and \(Y=0.182\); heat capacity was \(C=1.48\) and \(1.30\) J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ by two analysis routes, yielding \(\kappa=0.513\) and \(0.445\) W K⁻¹ m⁻¹.
  • Setup 2 at 21.23 ± 0.005 T gave \(\alpha=22.0\) mm² s⁻¹ by the half-time method versus \(24.1\) mm² s⁻¹ by curve fitting; zero-field and field-dependent \(\alpha\), \(C/T\), and \(\kappa\) showed good agreement with previous steady-state/literature data.

Methods

  • Bar-shaped SrCu₂(BO₃)₂ single crystals were measured in two setups: setup 1 had \(L=1.44\) mm and \(W=602\) µg; setup 2 had \(L=1.25\) mm and \(W=583\) µg. A Au-Ge film thermometer and Ni-Cr film heater were deposited on opposite ends, with heat flowing along the \(a\)-axis and magnetic field along the \(c\)-axis.
  • Electronics used a PXIe-6368 data acquisition board at 2 MHz, SR560 preamplifiers, a quasi-four-terminal arrangement, rectangular heat pulses, and a 10 kHz lock-in for thermometer resistance. Flat-top fields were generated by PID feedback using a main magnet up to ~40 T for 1.2 s and an auxiliary mini magnet.
  • Thermal properties were extracted using the half-time method and the Cape-Lehman curve-fitting method, then compared with reported steady-state data.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the measurable \(t_{1/2}\) range was roughly 0.2–20 ms, restricting the measurable temperature range of \(\alpha\) down to 2 K; zero-field \(\alpha\) was limited to 6 K because the heat pulse duration of 0.2–1 ms had to be much shorter than \(t_{1/2}\). This restriction could be removed by using a longer sample or an intense short pulse.
  • The paper notes ambiguity from the choice of analysis method: heat capacity from Eq. (3) does not include heat losses, so the curve-fitting-derived thermal conductivity is considered more accurate. It also reports that high-temperature \(C/T\) at 24.8 T deviates from reported 24 T data, possibly due to sample misalignment, accumulated temperature-calibration errors, or intrinsic field dependence.
  • Evident from the text: the demonstration is proof-of-principle on a single test material, SrCu₂(BO₃)₂, with two setups; broader validation across other samples or materials is not shown.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2302.01627

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

16 of 38 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    Above 25 T, the sample temperature gradually increases due to the strong magnetocaloric effect inherent to SrCu2(BO3)2.

    “turn leads to the gradual increase of temperature above 25 T, which is caused by the strong magnetocaloric effect inherent to SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 .30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      Figure 4(b) and its discussion (p. 4) report a magnetocaloric-effect measurement of field-dependent sample temperature in SrCu₂(BO₃)₂. Our copy describes a kink near 24 T and hysteresis below 27 T, but does not state that temperature gradually increases above 25 T; the figure itself is not readable in our text copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The feedback-controlled flat-top pulse has enabled measurement of a variety of physical quantities under high magnetic fields such as specific heat, NMR, and current-voltage characteristics.

    “The feedback-controlled flat-top pulse has enabled us to measure a variety of physical quantities under high magnetic fields such as specific heat, 21,25,26 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 22,24 current-voltage characteristic, 23 etc.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [21] source
    • cites [25] source
    • cites [26] source
    • cites [22] source
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23] source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The increase of C with dropping temperature might be caused by the tail structure of the field-induced first-order phase transition located outside the measurement window.

    “In the present case, the increase of C with dropping temperature might be caused by the tail structure of the field-induced first-order phase transition located outside our measurement window.30,43”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      The main text (p. 3) reports a heat-capacity singularity at 28 T that strongly suggests a first-order field-induced crystallization transition. It does not say that an increase in heat capacity on cooling is the tail of a transition outside a measurement window, so the proposed explanation is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [43] source

      Section 3 (page not available in our copy) discusses magnetization plateaux and a pressure-dependent shift in the temperature of maximum magnetic susceptibility. Searches for heat capacity C, a field-induced first-order transition, and a transition tail outside the measurement window found no passage addressing the proposed explanation. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Recent improvement of the field stabilization technique fully removes the risk of temperature instability induced by coupling between magnetic fields and sample temperature.

    “With the recent improvement of the field stabilization technique that fully removes the risk of the temperature instability induced by the coupling between magnetic fields and sample temperature, 25,26 it likely becomes possible to measure thermal conductivity under pulsed magnetic fields.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] source

      The Methods section, “Heat Capacity Measurements at Flat-Top Pulsed Magnetic Fields” (page not provided), describes improved field stabilization and reports that temperature fluctuations were suppressed to within ±0.01 K. That supports reduced temperature instability, but not the claim that its risk was fully removed. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] source

      Experimental Details (p. 2) reports using a field-feedback controller to stabilize pulsed fields and improve the resolution of specific-heat measurements. It says this minimized the influence of field instability, not that it fully removed the risk of sample-temperature instability caused by magnetic-field coupling. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Study design and conductcitation

    The thermal bath made of SrCu2(BO3)2 minimizes the temperature difference between sample and thermal bath induced by the large magnetocaloric effect in this material.

    “In this work, the thermal bath made of SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 minimizes the temperature difference between the sample and thermal bath induced by the large magnetocaloric effect in this material.30”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      The methods passage (p. 2) reports a magnetocaloric-effect measurement on SrCu₂(BO₃)₂, and Fig. 4 (p. 4) shows temperature changes during field sweeps. Neither passage says that a thermal bath was made of the material or that it minimized a sample–bath temperature difference; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims. 20

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Such a temperature dependence of κ is widely observed in inorganic spin-gap systems.

    “Such a temperature dependence is widely observed in inorganic spin-gap systems.37,38”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      The paper reports a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity pattern in the inorganic spin-gap compound CuGeO₃ (p. 2) and summarizes its characteristic features (p. 4). It does not establish that this pattern is widely observed across inorganic spin-gap systems. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [38] source

      The paper’s opening summary (p. 1) describes a huge increase in thermal conductivity at the transition in NaV₂O₅, but only modest kinks in CuGeO₃. Its discussion (p. 3) calls their behavior qualitatively different, rather than presenting the strong temperature dependence as widely observed in inorganic spin-gap systems. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The magnetic-field fluctuation in the flat-top region is ±0.005 T, which would only cause a small temperature fluctuation of ±0.002 K even in a material with a large magnetocaloric effect of ∼0.4 K/T, indicating field stability is good enough for the present method.

    “It is important to note that the magnetic-field fluctuation in the flattop region is ±0.005T, which would only cause a small temperature fluctuation of ±0.002K even in a material with a large magnetocaloric effect of ∼0.4 K/T such as a magnetic refrigerant material, 40 indicating that the field stability is good enough for the present method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The weak field dependence in κ above 20 T is similar to another spin gap system, BiCu2PO6, where κ is dramatically suppressed below the critical field of spin gap closure and becomes nearly constant above the critical field.

    “The weak field dependence in κ above 20 T is similar to another spin gap system, BiCu 2 PO 6 , 44 where κ is dramatically suppressed below the critical field of the spin gap closure and becomes nearly constant above the critical field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] source

      The Results section, “Giant suppression of thermal conductivity under magnetic field” (page unavailable), reports strong suppression of κ as the field approaches the critical field of about 23.5 T. It does not establish that κ becomes nearly constant above that field: at about 1.4 K, κ increases again above it, while at 5 K it remains strongly suppressed at 30 T. The paper’s reference to “constant behavior” concerns κmag/T as temperature varies at the critical field, not κ as field varies above it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The thermal diffusivity under zero magnetic field decreases gradually from high temperatures and increases exponentially below 8 K.

    “The thermal diffusivity under zero magnetic field decreases gradually from high temperatures and increases exponentially below 8 K.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The low-temperature shift of the broad peak and the upturn structure are observed in C/T with increasing magnetic fields.

    “The low-temperature shift of the broad peak and the upturn structure are observed in C/T with increasing magnetic fields (FIg.7(b)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On the flat-top region, the temperature on the backside increases rapidly and shows a local peak around t = 0.03 s, then gradually decreases.

    “The temperature on the backside increases rapidly and shows the local peak around t = 0.03 s, then gradually decreases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The thermal conductivity κ decreases monotonically from high temperature and turns to increase below 8 K.

    “The κ decreases monotonically from high temperature and turns to increase below 8 K.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The temperature dependence and absolute value of κ are consistent with reported data.

    “The temperature dependence and absolute value of κ are also consistent with the reported data as shown by the yellow dashed curve.39”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] source

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The reduction of α that is equivalent for the long t1/2 is observed above 24 T, while α shows a strong increase below 12 T.

    “The reduction of α that is equivalent for the long t 1/2 is observed above 24 T, while α shows a strong increase below 12 T.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The magnetic field was stabilized to 37.22 T by the mini magnet over a measurement time scale of 50 ms, resulting in stabilization of the sample temperature.

    “Subsequently, the magnetic field was stabilized to 37.22 T by the mini magnet over the measurement time scale of 50 ms, resulting in the stabilization of the sample temperature, as seen in Figs.6(a) and (b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fitting the time profile using Eq. (8) yields α = 27.9 mm2 s-1 and Y = 0.182.

    “We also fit the time profile using Eq. ( 8) shown as the red solid curve in Fig. 6(b), which yields the values of α = 27.9 mm 2 s -1 and Y = 0.182.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The present approach is valid and convenient.

    “Our proof-of-principle results show excellent agreement with data taken using a standard steady-state method, confirming the validity and convenience of the present approach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The PXIe-6368 board can collect low-voltage signals at a 2 MHz sampling rate, which is fast enough for thermodynamic measurements under pulsed magnetic fields of short duration.

    “The PXIe-6368 board can collect low-voltage signals at a 2 MHz sampling rate, which is fast enough for the thermodynamic measurements under pulsed magnetic fields of short duration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The peak structure in heat capacity is caused by spin-gap formation and is quantitatively consistent with the previous study.

    “The peak structure, which is caused by the spin-gap formation, is quantitatively consistent with the previous study as shown by the blue dashed curve in Fig. 5(b).36”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The measurable timescale of t1/2 is roughly from 0.2 to 20 ms in this experiment, restricting the measurable temperature range of α down to 2 K.

    “Because of the timescales of the flat-top region and of the heat pulse, the measurable timescale of t 1/2 is roughly from 0.2 to 20 ms in this experiment, which restricts the measurable temperature range of α down to 2 K”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The Au-Ge thermometers were calibrated using the RuO2 reference thermometer placed near the sample.

    “The Au-Ge thermometers were calibrated using the RuO 2 reference thermometer which was placed near the sample.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The measurements were performed within a timescale several times longer than t1/2, which is still shorter than the timescale used for a standard steady-state method.

    “Importantly, these measurements were performed within the timescale several times longer than t 1/2 (Fig. 5(a)) which is still shorter than the timescale used for a standard steady-state method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The half-time method is one of the sophisticated approaches to extracting thermal conductivity of solids from dynamical and diffusive heat transfer processes.

    “The half-time method is one of the sophisticated approaches to extracting the thermal conductivity of solids from the dynamical and diffusive heat transfer processes.12,31”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
    • cites [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The phase shift was negligibly small at the measurement frequency of 10 kHz, so thermometer resistance was calculated by the ratio of amplitudes.

    “Since the phase shift was negligibly small at the measurement frequency of 10 kHz, the thermometer resistance, R t , was calculated by the ratio of those amplitudes (R t = V 0 /I 0 ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Except during calibration, the sample space was evacuated to maintain the quasi-adiabatic condition.

    “Except during the calibration process, the sample space was evacuated to maintain the quasi-adiabatic condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The fit should be completed after the peak temperature (t > t_max) where ∆T shows an exponential decay.

    “Note that the fit should be completed after the peak temperature (t > t max ) where ∆T shows an exponential decay.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cape and Lehman provided equations to account for the influence of heat leak on the temperature-rise equation.

    “Cape and Lehman provided the following equations 27,28 to account for the influence of the heat leak on Eq. ( 1):”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] source
    • cites [28] source

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The value of α obtained by curve fitting agrees well with that of the half-time method, indicating both methods can be applied when the adiabatic condition is satisfied.

    “The value of α obtained by the curve fitting method agrees well with that of the half-time method, indicating that both methods can be applied in our setup when the adiabatic condition is satisfied.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The deviation of the high-temperature data at 24.8 T from reported data at 24 T is probably due to small sample misalignment, accumulated errors in temperature calibration, or intrinsic field dependence in C/T.

    “The deviation of the hightemperature data at 24.8 T from the reported data at 24 T is probably due to a small sample misalignment, accumulated errors in the temperature calibration, or intrinsic field dependence in C/T .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This scenario should also be realized in SrCu2(BO3)2 and is consistent with the observed weak field-dependence of κ.

    “This scenario should be also realized in SrCu 2 (BO 3 ) 2 and is consistent with the observed weak field-dependence of κ.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our method is a strong tool for comprehensive studies of heat transport and thermodynamic phenomena in pulsed magnetic fields as well as in static fields owing to the convenience of fast measurement time.

    “Our method is a strong tool for comprehensive studies of heat transport and thermodynamic phenomena in pulsed magnetic fields as well as in static fields owing to the convenience of fast measurement time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The suppression of the spin gap is expected to reduce the mean free path of phonons and suppress the zero field peak structure in κ.

    “The suppression of the spin gap is expected to reduce the mean free path of phonons and suppress the zero field peak structure in κ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
27 of 27

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most traditional measurement techniques used at low temperatures and magnetic fields can only provide one of specific heat or thermal conductivity.

    “However, most of the traditional measurement techniques used at low temperatures and magnetic fields can only provide one of these thermal properties.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When specific heat and thermal conductivity are measured separately, it is hard to replicate exact control parameters, leading to ambiguity in interpretation.

    “Although specific heat and thermal conductivity measurements can be performed separately, in practice it is hard to replicate exact values for the control parameters, such as cooling/heating rate, sample orientation in the magnetic field, and quality of the samples, leading to some ambiguity in the interpretation of results.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Measurements of thermal conductivity in pulsed magnetic fields have not yet been demonstrated.

    “On the other hand, measurements of thermal conductivity in pulsed magnetic fields have yet to be demonstrated.”

  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    An adiabatic condition where no heat exchange occurs between the sample and its surroundings is assumed in the half-time method discussion.

    “In the above discussion, an adiabatic condition where no heat exchange between sample and surroundings is assumed.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2 T. M. Tritt, Thermal conductivity: theory, properties, and applications (Springer Science & Business Media, 2005).
  2. 25 Y. Kohama, H. Ishikawa, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, N. Shannon, and Z. Hiroi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 , 10686-10690 (2019).
  3. 40 B. Wolf, Y. Tsui, D. Jaiswal-Nagar, U. Tutsch, A. Honecker, K. Removi´ cLanger, G. Hofmann, A. Prokofiev, W. Assmus, G. Donath, et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 , 6862-6866 (2011).
  4. 47 J. R. Sims, J. B. Schillig, G. S. Boebinger, H. Coe, A. W. Paris, M. J. Gordon, M. D. Pacheco, T. G. Abeln, R. G. Hoagland, M. C. Mataya, et al. , IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 12 , 480 (2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Nomoto, T., Zhong, C., Kageyama, H., Suzuki, Y., Jaime, M., Hashimoto, Y., Katsumoto, S., Matsuyama, N., Dong, C., Matsuo, A., Kindo, K., Izawa, K., & Kohama, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
94
Issue
5
ISSN
0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2302.01627
arXiv
2302.01627
OpenAlex
W4367600686
Semantic Scholar
8ac3d4c13f40064d94a6814b514e1dd74cc5f014
Cited by
5
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Review of Scientific Instruments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DMR-1,644,779, 1644779, 1157490, 2128556)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DMR-1157490, DMR-1644779, DMR-2128556)
  • National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (DMR-1157490, 1157490, DMR - 1644779, 1644779, DMR-2128556)
  • Precise Measurement Technology Promotion Foundation
  • University of Tokyo
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K20347, 23K13054, 23KK0052, 22H00104, 23K17666)
  • Division of Materials Research (DMR-2128556, 1644779, DMR- 1644779, 11‐57490, DMR 1157490, 2128556)
  • High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Keywords
specific heat, thermal conductivity, pulsed magnetic field, flash method, cryogenic temperatures, SrCu2(BO3)2, frustrated magnetism, single crystals, high magnetic fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review