CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 29Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureSuperconducting and THz Device Technology

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Fast Flux-Activated Leakage Reduction for Superconducting Quantum Circuits

Open access
Lacroix, Nathan, Hofele, Luca, Remm, Ants, Benhayoune-Khadraoui, Othmane, McDonald, Alexander, Shillito, Ross, Lazar, Stefania, Hellings, Christoph, Swiadek, Francois, Colao-Zanuz, Dante, Flasby, Alexander, Panah, Mohsen Bahrami, Kerschbaum, Michael, Norris, Graham J., Blais, Alexandre, Wallraff, Andreas, Krinner, Sebastian·2023·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2309.07060arXiv 2309.07060
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Quantum computers will require quantum error correction to reach the low error rates necessary for solving problems that surpass the capabilities of conventional computers. One of the dominant errors limiting the performance of quantum error correction codes across multiple technology platforms is leakage out of the computational subspace arising from the multi-level structure of qubit implementations. Here, we present a resource-efficient universal leakage reduction unit for superconducting qubits using parametric flux modulation. This operation removes leakage down to our measurement accuracy of $7\cdot 10^{-4}$ in approximately $50\, \mathrm{ns}$ with a low error of $2.5(1)\cdot 10^{-3}$ on the computational subspace, thereby reaching durations and fidelities comparable to those of single-qubit gates. We demonstrate that using the leakage reduction unit in repeated weight-two stabilizer measurements reduces the total number of detected errors in a scalable fashion to close to what can be achieved using leakage-rejection methods which do not scale. Our approach does neither require additional control electronics nor on-chip components and is applicable to both auxiliary and data qubits. These benefits make our method particularly attractive for mitigating leakage in large-scale quantum error correction circuits, a crucial requirement for the practical implementation of fault-tolerant quantum computation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2309.07060

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The constant detection probabilities are attributed to the dissipative stabilization of the cat qubits, which prevents the accumulation of leakage out of the cat qubit subspace without requiring additional protocols for active leakage suppression.

    “We attribute the constant detection probabilities here to the dissipative stabilization of the cat qubits, which prevents the accumulation of leakage out of the cat qubit subspace without requiring additional protocols for active leakage suppression55,56.”

    From Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation, in Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, edited by S. J. Lomonaco, Jr., (2010) [arXiv:0904.2557]. · arXiv
  2. B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memo- ries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  3. J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  4. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. H. Zurek, Resilient quantum computation: Error models and thresholds, Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 365 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  5. D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error rate, arXiv:quant-ph/ 9906129.
  6. M. McEwen et al., Removing leakage-induced correlated errors in superconducting quantum error correction, Nat. Commun. 12, 1761 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  7. K. C. Miao et al., Overcoming leakage in quantum error correction, Nat. Phys. 19, 1780 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  8. P. Aliferis and B. M. Terhal, Fault-tolerant quantum com- putation for local leakage faults, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 139 (2007). · DOI
  9. A. G. Fowler, Coping with qubit leakage in topological codes, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042308 (2013). · DOI
  10. J. Ghosh and A. G. Fowler, Leakage-resilient approach to fault-tolerant quantum computing with superconducting elements, Phys. Rev. A 91, 020302(R) (2015). · DOI
  11. M. Suchara, A. W. Cross, and J. M. Gambetta, Quantum Inf. Comput. 15, 997 (2015). · DOI
  12. C. C. Bultink, T. E. O'Brien, R. Vollmer, N. Muthusubramanian, M. W. Beekman, M. A. Rol, X. Fu, B. Tarasinski, V. Ostroukh, B. Varbanov, A. Bruno, and L. DiCarlo, Protecting quantum entanglement from leakage and qubit errors via repetitive parity measurements, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay3050 (2020). · DOI
  13. B. M. Varbanov, F. Battistel, B. M. Tarasinski, V. P. Ostroukh, T. E. O'Brien, L. DiCarlo, and B. M. Terhal, Leakage detection for a transmon-based surface code, npj Quantum Inf. 6, 102 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  14. F. Battistel, B. M. Varbanov, and B. M. Terhal, Hardware- efficient leakage-reduction scheme for quantum error cor- rection with superconducting transmon qubits, PRX Quan- tum 2, 030314 (2021). · DOI
  15. R. Stricker, D. Vodola, A. Erhard, L. Postler, M. Meth, M. Ringbauer, P. Schindler, T. Monz, M. Müller, and R. Blatt, Experimental deterministic correction of qubit loss, Nature (London) 585, 207 (2020). · DOI
  16. D. Hayes, D. Stack, B. Bjork, A. C. Potter, C. H. Baldwin, and R. P. Stutz, Eliminating leakage errors in hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 170501 (2020). · DOI
  17. R. W. Andrews, C. Jones, M. D. Reed, A. M. Jones, S. D. Ha, M. P. Jura, J. Kerckhoff, M. Levendorf, S. Meenehan, S. T. Merkel, A. Smith, B. Sun, A. J. Weinstein, M. T. Rakher, T. D. Ladd, and M. G. Borselli, Quantifying error and leakage in an encoded Si/SiGe triple-dot qubit, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 747 (2019). · DOI
  18. C. Wu, S. Kumar, Y. Kan, D. Komisar, Z. Wang, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, and F. Ding, Room-temperature on-chip orbital angular momentum single-photon sources, Sci. Adv. 8, eabk3075 (2022). · DOI
  19. F. Motzoi, J. M. Gambetta, P. Rebentrost, and F. K. Wilhelm, Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110501 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Z. Chen et al., Measuring and suppressing quantum state leakage in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 020501 (2016). · DOI
  21. M. Werninghaus, D. J. Egger, F. Roy, S. Machnes, F. K. Wilhelm, and S. Filipp, Leakage reduction in fast super- conducting qubit gates via optimal control, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 14 (2021). · DOI
  22. S. Lazăr, Q. Ficheux, J. Herrmann, A. Remm, N. Lacroix, C. Hellings, F. Swiadek, D. C. Zanuz, G. J. Norris, M. B. Panah, A. Flasby, M. Kerschbaum, J. Besse, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Calibration of drive nonlinearity for arbitrary-angle single-qubit gates using error amplification, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 024036 (2023). · DOI
  23. R. Barends et al., Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit, Nature (London) 534, 222 (2016). · DOI
  24. M. A. Rol, F. Battistel, F. K. Malinowski, C. C. Bultink, B. M. Tarasinski, R. Vollmer, N. Haider, N. Muthusubramanian, A. Bruno, B. M. Terhal, and L. DiCarlo, Fast, high-fidelity conditional-phase gate exploiting leakage interference in weakly anharmonic superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 120502 (2019). · DOI
  25. M. C. Collodo, J. Herrmann, N. Lacroix, C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Lazar, J.-C. Besse, T. Walter, A. Wallraff, and C. Eichler, Implementation of conditional phase gates based on tunable ZZ interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240502 (2020). · DOI
  26. V. Negirneac, H. Ali, N. Muthusubramanian, F. Battistel, R. Sagastizabal, M. S. Moreira, J. F. Marques, W. J. Vlothuizen, M. Beekman, C. Zachariadis, N. Haider, A. Bruno, and L. DiCarlo, High-fidelity controlled-Z gate with maximal intermediate leakage operating at the speed limit in a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 220502 (2021). · DOI
  27. D. Sank, Z. Chen, M. Khezri, J. Kelly, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, A. Fowler et al., Measurement-induced state transitions in a super- conducting qubit: Beyond the rotating wave approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190503 (2016). · DOI
  28. R. Shillito, A. Petrescu, J. Cohen, J. Beall, M. Hauru, M. Ganahl, A. G. Lewis, G. Vidal, and A. Blais, Dynamics of transmon ionization, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034031 (2022). · DOI
  29. M. Khezri, A. Opremcak, Z. Chen, K. C. Miao, M. McEwen, A. Bengtsson, T. White, O. Naaman, D. Sank, A. N. Korotkov, Y. Chen, and V. Smelyanskiy, Measurement-induced state transitions in a superconducting qubit: Within the rotating-wave approximation, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 054008 (2023). · DOI
  30. Z. Chen et al., Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction, Nature (London) 595, 383 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  31. P. Magnard, P. Kurpiers, B. Royer, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, S. Storz, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Fast and unconditional all-microwave reset of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 060502 (2018). · DOI
  32. D. Egger, M. Werninghaus, M. Ganzhorn, G. Salis, A. Fuhrer, P. Müller, and S. Filipp, Pulsed reset protocol for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044030 (2018). · DOI
  33. Y. Zhou, Z. Zhang, Z. Yin, S. Huai, X. Gu, X. Xu, J. Allcock, F. Liu, G. Xi, Q. Yu, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Li, X. Song, Z. Wang, D. Zheng, S. An, Y. Zheng, and S. Zhang, Rapid and unconditional parametric reset protocol for tunable super- conducting qubits, Nat. Commun. 12, 5924 (2021). · DOI
  34. A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quan- tum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  35. J. F. Marques, H. Ali, B. M. Varbanov, M. Finkel, H. M. Veen, S. L. M. van der Meer, S. Valles-Sanclemente, N. Muthusubramanian, M. Beekman, N. Haider, B. M. Terhal, and L. DiCarlo, All-microwave leakage reduction units for quantum error correction with superconducting transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 250602 (2023). · DOI
  36. J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  37. F. Beaudoin, M. P. da Silva, Z. Dutton, and A. Blais, First- order sidebands in circuit QED using qubit frequency modulation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 022305 (2012). · DOI
  38. C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Lazar et al., Repeated quantum error detection in a surface code, Nat. Phys. 16, 875 (2020). · DOI
  39. J. F. Marques, B. M. Varbanov, M. S. Moreira, H. Ali, N. Muthusubramanian, C. Zachariadis, F. Battistel, M. Beekman, N. Haider, W. Vlothuizen, A. Bruno, B. M. Terhal, and L. DiCarlo, Logical-qubit operations in an error-detecting surface code, Nat. Phys. 18, 80 (2022). · DOI
  40. Y. Wu et al., Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  41. J. Cohen, A. Petrescu, R. Shillito, and A. Blais, Reminis- cence of classical chaos in driven transmons, PRX Quantum 4, 020312 (2023). · DOI
  42. F. Swiadek, R. Shillito, P. Magnard, A. Remm, C. Hellings, N. Lacroix, Q. Ficheux, D. C. Zanuz, G. J. Norris, A. Blais, S. Krinner, and A. Wallraff, Enhancing dispersive readout of superconducting qubits through dynamic control of the dispersive shift: Experiment and theory, PRX Quantum 5, 040326 (2024). · DOI
  43. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.120601, which in- cludes Refs. [46-50], for additional information and ex- perimental details. · DOI
  44. S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Heinsoo, R. Keller, J. Lütolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems, Eur. Phys. J. Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019). · DOI
  45. C. Macklin, K. O'Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, A near- quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric am- plifier, Science 350, 307 (2015). · DOI
  46. A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021). · DOI
  47. S. Krinner, P. Kurpiers, B. Royer, P. Magnard, I. Tsitsilin, J.-C. Besse, A. Remm, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Demonstration of an all-microwave controlled-phase gate between far-detuned qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 044039 (2020). · DOI
  48. S. T. Spitz, B. Tarasinski, C. W. J. Beenakker, and T. E. O'Brien, Adaptive weight estimator for quantum error correction in a time-dependent environment, Adv. Quantum Technol. 1, 1800012 (2018). · DOI
  49. J. D. Strand, M. Ware, F. Beaudoin, T. A. Ohki, B. R. Johnson, A. Blais, and B. L. T. Plourde, First-order sideband transitions with flux-driven asymmetric transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. B 87, 220505 (2013). · DOI
  50. S. A. Caldwell et al., Parametrically activated entangling gates using transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 034050 (2018). · DOI
  51. G. N. Watson, A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  52. J. Heinsoo, C. K. Andersen, A. Remm, S. Krinner, T. Walter, Y. Salathé, S. Gasparinetti, J.-C. Besse, A. Potočnik, A. Wallraff, and C. Eichler, Rapid high-fidelity multiplexed readout of superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 034040 (2018). · DOI
  53. S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, A. D. Paolo, E. Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Herrmann, G. J. Norris, C. K. Andersen, M. Müller, A. Blais, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature (London) 605, 669 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  54. N. Sundaresan, T. J. Yoder, Y. Kim, M. Li, E. H. Chen, G. Harper, T. Thorbeck, A. W. Cross, A. D. Córcoles, and M. Takita, Demonstrating multi-round subsystem quantum error correction using matching and maximum likelihood decoders, Nat. Commun. 14, 2852 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  55. P. V. Klimov et al., Fluctuations of energy-relaxation times in superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090502 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  56. J. Lisenfeld, A. Bilmes, A. Megrant, R. Barends, J. Kelly, P. Klimov, G. Weiss, J. M. Martinis, and A. V. Ustinov, Electric field spectroscopy of material defects in transmon qubits, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 105 (2019). · DOI
  57. D. C. Zanuz, Q. Ficheux, L. Michaud, A. Orekhov, K. Hanke, A. Flasby, M. B. Panah, G. J. Norris, M. Kerschbaum, A. Remm, F. Swiadek, C. Hellings, S. Lazăr, C. Scarato, N. Lacroix, S. Krinner, C. Eichler, A. Wallraff, and J.-C. Besse, Mitigating losses of superconducting qubits strongly coupled to defect modes, arXiv:2407.18746. · arXiv
  58. E. Magesan, J. M. Gambetta, B. R. Johnson, C. A. Ryan, J. M. Chow, S. T. Merkel, M. P. da Silva, G. A. Keefe, M. B. Rothwell, T. A. Ohki, M. B. Ketchen, and M. Steffen, Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 080505 (2012). · DOI
  59. S. M. Assad, O. Thearle, and P. K. Lam, Maximizing device-independent randomness from a Bell experiment by optimizing the measurement settings, Phys. Rev. A 94, 012304 (2016). · DOI
  60. J. Kelly et al., State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit, Nature (London) 519, 66 (2015). · DOI
  61. Google Quantum AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scal- ing a surface code logical qubit, Nature (London) 614, 676 (2023). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lacroix, N., Hofele, L., Remm, A., Benhayoune-Khadraoui, O., McDonald, A., Shillito, R., Lazar, S., Hellings, C., Swiadek, F., Colao-Zanuz, D., Flasby, A., Panah, M. B., Kerschbaum, M., Norris, G. J., Blais, A., Wallraff, A., & Krinner, S.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
134
Issue
12
Pages
120601-120601
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2309.07060
arXiv
2309.07060
OpenAlex
W4408818792
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2023: 1
FWCI
11.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (170731)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence (W911NF-16-1-0070, W911NF-16-1-0071)
  • European Commission (828826)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (120601, 206021, 170731)
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Canada First Research Excellence Fund (W911NF-18-1-0411)
  • ETH Zürich Foundation
  • Office of Science
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (820363, 828826, H2020-FETFLAG-2018-03)
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (W911NF-16-1-0070, W911NF-16-1-0071, 828826)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (W911NF-18-1-0411)
  • National Center of Competence in Research Quantum Science and Technology (206021-170731)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-18-1-0411, W911NF-16-1-0070, W911NF-16-1-, W911NF, W911NF-16-1-0071)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
Keywords
leakage reduction, superconducting qubits, quantum error correction, stabilizer measurements, fault-tolerant quantum computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review