PreprintCited by 1Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language Models

Open access
Lyu, Yougang, Yan, Lingyong, Wang, Shuaiqiang, Shi, Haibo, Yin, Dawei, Ren, Pengjie, Chen, Zhumin, de Rijke, Maarten +1 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Despite their success at many natural language processing (NLP) tasks, large language models still struggle to effectively leverage knowledge for knowledge-intensive tasks, manifesting limitations such as generating incomplete, non-factual, or illogical answers. These limitations stem from inadequate knowledge awareness of LLMs during vanilla fine-tuning. To address these problems, we propose a knowledge-aware fine-tuning (KnowTuning) method to improve fine-grained and coarse-grained knowledge awareness of LLMs. We devise a fine-grained knowledge augmentation stage to train LLMs to identify difficult fine-grained knowledge in answers. We also propose a coarse-grained knowledge comparison stage to train LLMs to distinguish between reliable and unreliable knowledge, in three aspects: completeness, factuality, and logicality. Extensive experiments on both generic and medical question answering (QA) datasets confirm the effectiveness of KnowTuning, through automatic and human evaluations, across various sizes of LLMs. We further verify that KnowTuning generates more facts with less factual error rate under fine-grained facts evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.11176

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs are fine-tuned on corpora that explicitly encode structured physical knowledge to better align model priors with real-world dynamics.

    “First, LLMs are fine-tuned on corpora that explicitly encode structured physical knowledge - such as object attributes, spatial relationships, or physical laws - to better align model priors with real-world dynamics (Lyu et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023c).”

    From Large Language Model Reasoning Failures (2026) · cites this paper as Lyu et al., 2024

    Section 3.2, “Fine-grained Knowledge Augmentation,” describes fine-tuning LLMs on question–answer pairs built from atomic facts, supporting the knowledge-aware fine-tuning part of the claim. The paper’s datasets section describes generic and medical question answering, not corpora encoding spatial relationships or physical laws to align models with real-world dynamics. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models

    Yu, J., Wang, X., Tu, S., Cao, S., Zhang-Li, D., Lv, X., Peng, H., Yao, Z., Zhang, X., Li, H., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.09296 · Cited by 29 · cited 8× · see citing works

    “In particular, they are prone to generating responses that are non-factual (Lee et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2023; Su et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023b), incomplete (Singhal et al., 2022; Bian et al., 2023), or illogical (Chen et al., 2023c; Zhong et al., 2023; Kang et al., 2023).”
    BackgroundInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. Asma Ben Abacha and Dina Demner-Fushman. 2019. A question-entailment approach to question answering. BMC Bioinform., 20(1):511:1-511:23. · DOI
  2. Tal August, Katharina Reinecke, and Noah A. Smith. 2022. Generating scientific definitions with control- lable complexity. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 8298-8317. · DOI
  3. Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, Carol Chen, Catherine Olsson, Christo- pher Olah, Danny Hernandez, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Dustin Li, Eli Tran-Johnson, Ethan Perez, Jamie Kerr, Jared Mueller, Jeffrey Ladish, Joshua Landau, Kamal Ndousse, Kamile Lukosiute, Liane Lovitt, Michael Sellitto, Nelson Elhage, Nicholas Schiefer, Noemí Mercado, Nova DasSarma, Robert Lasenby, Robin Larson, Sam Ringer, Scott John- ston, Shauna Kravec, Sheer El Showk, Stanislav Fort, Tamera Lanham, Timothy Telleen-Lawton, Tom Con- erly, Tom Henighan, Tristan Hume, Samuel R. Bow- man, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, and Jared Kaplan. 2022. Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI feedback. CoRR, abs/2212.08073. · DOI
  4. Yuyang Bai, Shangbin Feng, Vidhisha Balachandran, Zhaoxuan Tan, Shiqi Lou, Tianxing He, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2023. KGQuiz: Evaluating the generaliza- tion of encoded knowledge in large language models. CoRR, abs/2310.09725. · DOI
  5. Satanjeev Banerjee and Alon Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with im- proved correlation with human judgments. In Pro- ceedings of the acl workshop on intrinsic and ex- trinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization, pages 65-72.
  6. Ning Bian, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, and Ben He. 2024. ChatGPT is a knowledge- able but inexperienced solver: An investigation of commonsense problem in large language models. In Proceedings of COLING. · DOI
  7. Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Proceedings of NeurIPS.
  8. Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, Linyi Yang, Xiaoyuan Yi, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Yue Zhang, Yi Chang, Philip S. Yu, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie. 2023. A survey on evaluation of large language mod- els. CoRR, abs/2307.03109. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lichang Chen, Shiyang Li, Jun Yan, Hai Wang, Kalpa Gunaratna, Vikas Yadav, Zheng Tang, Vijay Srini- vasan, Tianyi Zhou, Heng Huang, and Hongxia Jin. 2023a. AlpaGasus: Training a better Alpaca with fewer data. CoRR, abs/2307.08701. · DOI
  10. Shiqi Chen, Yiran Zhao, Jinghan Zhang, I-Chun Chern, Siyang Gao, Pengfei Liu, and Junxian He. 2023b. FELM: benchmarking factuality evaluation of large language models. CoRR, abs/2310.00741. · DOI
  11. Zhipeng Chen, Kun Zhou, Wayne Xin Zhao, Junchen Wan, Fuzheng Zhang, Di Zhang, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024. Improving large language models via fine- grained reinforcement learning with minimum edit- ing constraint. CoRR, abs/2401.06081. · DOI
  12. Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Eric Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, Albert Web- son, Shixiang Shane Gu, Zhuyun Dai, Mirac Suz- gun, Xinyun Chen, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Gaurav Mishra, Adams Yu, Vincent Y. Zhao, Yanping Huang, Andrew M. Dai, Hongkun Yu, Slav Petrov, Ed H. Chi, Jeff Dean, Jacob Devlin, Adam Roberts, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, and Jason Wei. 2022. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. CoRR, abs/2210.11416. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Miruna-Adriana Clinciu, Arash Eshghi, and Helen F. Hastie. 2021. A study of automatic metrics for the evaluation of natural language explanations. In Pro- ceedings of EACL, pages 2376-2387. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
  14. Hanze Dong, Wei Xiong, Deepanshu Goyal, Rui Pan, Shizhe Diao, Jipeng Zhang, Kashun Shum, and Tong Zhang. 2023. RAFT: Reward ranked finetuning for generative foundation model alignment. CoRR, abs/2304.06767. · DOI
  15. Shihan Dou, Enyu Zhou, Yan Liu, Songyang Gao, Jun Zhao, Wei Shen, Yuhao Zhou, Zhiheng Xi, Xiao Wang, Xiaoran Fan, Shiliang Pu, Jiang Zhu, Rui Zheng, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, and Xuanjing Huang. 2023. LoRAMoE: Revolutionizing mixture of ex- perts for maintaining world knowledge in language model alignment. CoRR, abs/2312.09979. · DOI
  16. Yann Dubois, Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang, Ishaan Gulrajani, Jimmy Ba, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto. 2023. Alpaca- Farm: A simulation framework for methods that learn from human feedback. CoRR, abs/2305.14387. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Angela Fan, Yacine Jernite, Ethan Perez, David Grang- ier, Jason Weston, and Michael Auli. 2019. ELI5: long form question answering. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 3558-3567. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jinlan Fu, See-Kiong Ng, Zhengbao Jiang, and Pengfei Liu. 2023. GPTScore: Evaluate as you desire. CoRR, abs/2302.04166. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Bofei Gao, Feifan Song, Yibo Miao, Zefan Cai, Zhe Yang, Liang Chen, Helan Hu, Runxin Xu, Qingxiu Dong, Ce Zheng, et al. 2024. Towards a unified view of preference learning for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02795. · arXiv
  20. Jian Guan, Xiaoxi Mao, Changjie Fan, Zitao Liu, Wen- biao Ding, and Minlie Huang. 2021. Long text gen- eration by modeling sentence-level and discourse- level coherence. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 6379- 6393. · DOI
  21. Geyang Guo, Ranchi Zhao, Tianyi Tang, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2023. Beyond imitation: Leveraging fine-grained quality signals for alignment. CoRR, abs/2311.04072. · DOI
  22. John Hewitt, Sarah Chen, Lanruo Lora Xie, Edward Adams, Percy Liang, and Christopher D Manning. 2024. Model editing with canonical examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06155. · arXiv
  23. Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In Proceedings of ICLR.
  24. Wenyue Hua, Jiang Guo, Mingwen Dong, Henghui Zhu, Patrick Ng, and Zhiguo Wang. 2024. Propagation and pitfalls: Reasoning-based assessment of knowl- edge editing through counterfactual tasks. CoRR, abs/2401.17585. · DOI
  25. Neel Jain, Ping-yeh Chiang, Yuxin Wen, John Kirchen- bauer, Hong-Min Chu, Gowthami Somepalli, Brian R. Bartoldson, Bhavya Kailkhura, Avi Schwarzschild, Aniruddha Saha, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, and Tom Goldstein. 2023. NEFTune: Noisy em- beddings improve instruction finetuning. CoRR, abs/2310.05914. · DOI
  26. Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Yan Xu, Nayeon Lee, Etsuko Ishii, and Pascale Fung. 2023. Towards mitigat- ing hallucination in large language models via self- reflection. CoRR, abs/2310.06271. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Men- sch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de Las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Re- nard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timo- thée Lacroix, and William El Sayed. 2023. Mistral 7b. CoRR, abs/2310.06825. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Saurav Kadavath, Tom Conerly, Amanda Askell, Tom Henighan, Dawn Drain, Ethan Perez, Nicholas Schiefer, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Nova DasSarma, Eli Tran-Johnson, Scott Johnston, Sheer El Showk, Andy Jones, Nelson Elhage, Tristan Hume, Anna Chen, Yuntao Bai, Sam Bowman, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Danny Hernandez, Josh Jacobson, Jack- son Kernion, Shauna Kravec, Liane Lovitt, Ka- mal Ndousse, Catherine Olsson, Sam Ringer, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Nicholas Joseph, Ben Mann, Sam McCandlish, Chris Olah, and Jared Kaplan. 2022. Language models (mostly) know what they know. CoRR, abs/2207.05221. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Minki Kang, Seanie Lee, Jinheon Baek, Kenji Kawaguchi, and Sung Ju Hwang. 2023. Knowledge- augmented reasoning distillation for small lan- guage models in knowledge-intensive tasks. CoRR, abs/2305.18395. · DOI
  30. Omar Khattab, Keshav Santhanam, Xiang Lisa Li, David Hall, Percy Liang, Christopher Potts, and Matei Zaharia. 2022. Demonstrate-search-predict: Composing retrieval and language models for knowledge-intensive NLP. CoRR, abs/2212.14024. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Miyoung Ko, Jinhyuk Lee, Hyunjae Kim, Gangwoo Kim, and Jaewoo Kang. 2020. Look at the first sentence: Position bias in question answering. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1109-1121. · DOI
  32. Kalpesh Krishna, Aurko Roy, and Mohit Iyyer. 2021. Hurdles to progress in long-form question answering. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 4940-4957. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Red- field, Michael Collins, Ankur P. Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Ken- ton Lee, Kristina Toutanova, Llion Jones, Matthew Kelcey, Ming-Wei Chang, Andrew M. Dai, Jakob Uszkoreit, Quoc Le, and Slav Petrov. 2019. Natu- ral questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, 7:452- 466. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Harrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Kellie Lu, Thomas Mesnard, Colton Bishop, Victor Car- bune, and Abhinav Rastogi. 2023. RLAIF: Scaling reinforcement learning from human feedback with AI feedback. CoRR, abs/2309.00267. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Nayeon Lee, Wei Ping, Peng Xu, Mostofa Patwary, Pas- cale Fung, Mohammad Shoeybi, and Bryan Catan- zaro. 2022. Factuality enhanced language models for open-ended text generation. In Proceedings of NeurIPS.
  36. Ming Li, Yong Zhang, Zhitao Li, Jiuhai Chen, Lichang Chen, Ning Cheng, Jianzong Wang, Tianyi Zhou, and Jing Xiao. 2023. From quantity to quality: Boosting LLM performance with self-guided data selection for instruction tuning. CoRR, abs/2308.12032. · DOI
  37. Jiacheng Liu, Skyler Hallinan, Ximing Lu, Pengfei He, Sean Welleck, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Yejin Choi. 2022a. Rainier: Reinforced knowledge introspector for commonsense question answering. In Proceed- ings of EMNLP, pages 8938-8958. · DOI
  38. Jiacheng Liu, Alisa Liu, Ximing Lu, Sean Welleck, Pe- ter West, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin Choi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2022b. Generated knowledge prompting for commonsense reasoning. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 3154-3169. · DOI
  39. Jiacheng Liu, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Hannaneh Ha- jishirzi, Yejin Choi, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2023a. Crystal: Introspective reasoners reinforced with self- feedback. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 11557- 11572.
  40. Yixin Liu, Alexander R. Fabbri, Pengfei Liu, Yilun Zhao, Linyong Nan, Ruilin Han, Simeng Han, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu, Caiming Xiong, and Dragomir Radev. 2023b. Revisiting the gold stan- dard: Grounding summarization evaluation with ro- bust human evaluation. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 4140-4170. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. · DOI
  41. Shayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, Barret Zoph, Jason Wei, and Adam Roberts. 2023. The Flan collection: Designing data and methods for effective instruction tuning. In Proceedings of ICML, volume 202, pages 22631-22648.
  42. Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2019. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In Proceedings of ICLR.
  43. Haipeng Luo, Qingfeng Sun, Can Xu, Pu Zhao, Jian- guang Lou, Chongyang Tao, Xiubo Geng, Qingwei Lin, Shifeng Chen, and Dongmei Zhang. 2023. Wiz- ardMath: Empowering mathematical reasoning for large language models via reinforced evol-instruct. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09583. · arXiv
  44. Yougang Lyu, Jitai Hao, Zihan Wang, Kai Zhao, Shen Gao, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Fang Wang, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023a. Multi-defendant legal judg- ment prediction via hierarchical reasoning. In Find- ings of EMNLP, pages 2198-2209. · DOI
  45. Yougang Lyu, Piji Li, Yechang Yang, Maarten de Rijke, Pengjie Ren, Yukun Zhao, Dawei Yin, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023b. Feature-level debiased natural language understanding. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 13353- 13361. · DOI
  46. Yougang Lyu, Zihan Wang, Zhaochun Ren, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Yujun Li, Hongsong Li, and Hongye Song. 2022. Improving legal judg- ment prediction through reinforced criminal element extraction. Inf. Process. Manag., 59(1):102780. · DOI
  47. Nick Mecklenburg, Yiyou Lin, Xiaoxiao Li, Daniel Holstein, Leonardo Nunes, Sara Malvar, Bruno Silva, Ranveer Chandra, Vijay Aski, Pavan Kumar Reddy Yannam, et al. 2024. Injecting new knowledge into large language models via supervised fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.00213. · arXiv
  48. Sewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Wei Koh, Mohit Iyyer, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023. FActScore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation. In Proceed- ings of EMNLP, pages 12076-12100.
  49. Aditi Mishra, Sajjadur Rahman, Hannah Kim, Kushan Mitra, and Estevam Hruschka. 2023. Characterizing large language models as rationalizers of knowledge- intensive tasks. CoRR, abs/2311.05085. · DOI
  50. Fedor Moiseev, Zhe Dong, Enrique Alfonseca, and Mar- tin Jaggi. 2022. SKILL: Structured knowledge infu- sion for large language models. In Proceedings of NAACL, pages 1581-1588. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Ani Nenkova and Rebecca J. Passonneau. 2004. Evalu- ating content selection in summarization: The Pyra- mid method. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pages 145-152.
  52. Minh Nguyen, Kishan K. C., Toan Nguyen, Ankit Chadha, and Thuy Vu. 2023. Efficient fine-tuning large language models for knowledge-aware response planning. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Dis- covery in Databases: Research Track -European Conference, ECML PKDD 2023, Turin, Italy, Septem- ber 18-22, 2023, Proceedings, Part II, volume 14170 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 593- 611. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, John Schulman, Jacob Hilton, Fraser Kelton, Luke Miller, Maddie Simens, Amanda Askell, Peter Welinder, Paul F. Christiano, Jan Leike, and Ryan Lowe. 2022. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. In Proceedings of NeurIPS.
  54. Baolin Peng, Chunyuan Li, Pengcheng He, Michel Gal- ley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2023. Instruction tuning with GPT-4. CoRR, abs/2304.03277. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Fabio Petroni, Aleksandra Piktus, Angela Fan, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Majid Yazdani, Nicola De Cao, James Thorne, Yacine Jernite, Vladimir Karpukhin, Jean Maillard, Vassilis Plachouras, Tim Rocktäschel, and Sebastian Riedel. 2021. KILT: a benchmark for knowledge intensive language tasks. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 2523-2544. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Evaggelia Pitoura, Panayiotis Tsaparas, Giorgos Flouris, Irini Fundulaki, Panagiotis Papadakos, Serge Abite- boul, and Gerhard Weikum. 2017. On measuring bias in online information. SIGMOD Rec., 46(4):16-21. · DOI
  57. Chengwei Qin, Aston Zhang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Jiaao Chen, Michihiro Yasunaga, and Diyi Yang. 2023. Is ChatGPT a general-purpose natural language process- ing task solver? In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1339-1384.
  58. Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Ste- fano Ermon, Christopher D. Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. CoRR, abs/2305.18290. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Corby Rosset, Chenyan Xiong, Minh Phan, Xia Song, Paul N. Bennett, and Saurabh Tiwary. 2020. Knowledge-aware language model pretraining. CoRR, abs/2007.00655. · arXiv
  60. Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, and Ross J. Anderson. 2023. The curse of recursion: Training on generated data makes models forget. CoRR, abs/2305.17493. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S. Sara Mah- davi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Kumar Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, Perry Payne, Martin Seneviratne, Paul Gamble, Chris Kelly, Nathaneal Schärli, Aakanksha Chowdh- ery, Philip Andrew Mansfield, Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Dale R. Webster, Gregory S. Corrado, Yossi Matias, Katherine Chou, Juraj Gottweis, Nenad Tomasev, Yun Liu, Alvin Rajkomar, Joelle K. Barral, Christo- pher Semturs, Alan Karthikesalingam, and Vivek Natarajan. 2022. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. CoRR, abs/2212.13138. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Aviv Slobodkin, Avi Caciularu, Eran Hirsch, and Ido Da- gan. 2023. Don't add, don't miss: Effective content preserving generation from pre-selected text spans. In Findings of EMNLP, pages 12784-12800.
  63. Feifan Song, Yuxuan Fan, Xin Zhang, Peiyi Wang, and Houfeng Wang. 2024. ICDPO: Effectively borrow- ing alignment capability of others via in-context di- rect preference optimization. CoRR, abs/2402.09320. · DOI
  64. Feifan Song, Bowen Yu, Minghao Li, Haiyang Yu, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, and Houfeng Wang. 2023. Pref- erence ranking optimization for human alignment. CoRR, abs/2306.17492. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Dan Su, Xiaoguang Li, Jindi Zhang, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, and Pascale Fung. 2022. Read before generate! Faithful long form question answering with machine reading. In Findings of ACL, pages 744- 756. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Weiwei Sun, Zhengliang Shi, Shen Gao, Pengjie Ren, Maarten de Rijke, and Zhaochun Ren. 2023. Con- trastive learning reduces hallucination in conversa- tions. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 13618-13626. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Katherine Tian, Eric Mitchell, Huaxiu Yao, Christo- pher D Manning, and Chelsea Finn. 2023. Fine- tuning language models for factuality. In Proceed- ings of NeurIPS Workshop on Instruction Tuning and Instruction Following.
  68. Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Al- bert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton- Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, An- thony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Khabsa, Isabel Kloumann, Artem Korenev, Punit Singh Koura, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Thibaut Lavril, Jenya Lee, Di- ana Liskovich, Yinghai Lu, Yuning Mao, Xavier Mar- tinet, Todor Mihaylov, Pushkar Mishra, Igor Moly- bog, Yixin Nie, Andrew Poulton, Jeremy Reizen- stein, Rashi Rungta, Kalyan Saladi, Alan Schelten, Ruan Silva, Eric Michael Smith, Ranjan Subrama- nian, Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Binh Tang, Ross Tay- lor, Adina Williams, Jian Xiang Kuan, Puxin Xu, Zheng Yan, Iliyan Zarov, Yuchen Zhang, Angela Fan, Melanie Kambadur, Sharan Narang, Aurélien Ro- driguez, Robert Stojnic, Sergey Edunov, and Thomas Scialom. 2023. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine- tuned chat models. CoRR, abs/2307.09288. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Cunxiang Wang, Sirui Cheng, Zhikun Xu, Bowen Ding, Yidong Wang, and Yue Zhang. 2023a. Evaluat- ing open question answering evaluation. CoRR, abs/2305.12421. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Cunxiang Wang, Xiaoze Liu, Yuanhao Yue, Xiangru Tang, Tianhang Zhang, Jiayang Cheng, Yunzhi Yao, Wenyang Gao, Xuming Hu, Zehan Qi, Yidong Wang, Linyi Yang, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Zheng Zhang, and Yue Zhang. 2023b. Survey on factuality in large language models: Knowledge, retrieval and domain- specificity. CoRR, abs/2310.07521. · DOI · Paper page
  71. Keheng Wang, Feiyu Duan, Sirui Wang, Peiguang Li, Yunsen Xian, Chuantao Yin, Wenge Rong, and Zhang Xiong. 2023c. Knowledge-driven CoT: Exploring faithful reasoning in LLMs for knowledge-intensive question answering. CoRR, abs/2308.13259. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Liang Chen, Feifan Song, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Tianyu Liu, and Zhifang Sui. 2023d. Making large language models better reasoners with alignment. CoRR, abs/2309.02144. · DOI
  73. Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Liang Chen, Dawei Zhu, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Qi Liu, Tianyu Liu, and Zhifang Sui. 2023e. Large language models are not fair evaluators. CoRR, abs/2305.17926. · DOI · Paper page
  74. Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A. Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2023f. Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions. In Proceed- ings of ACL, pages 13484-13508. · DOI · Paper page
  75. Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormo- labashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Atharva Naik, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, An- jana Arunkumar, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Gi- annis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Gary Lai, Ishan Puro- hit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuz- nia, Krima Doshi, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Maitreya Pa- tel, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Puro- hit, Neeraj Varshney, Phani Rohitha Kaza, Pulkit Verma, Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Rushang Karia, Savan Doshi, Shailaja Keyur Sampat, Siddhartha Mishra, Sujan Reddy A, Sumanta Patro, Tanay Dixit, and Xudong Shen. 2022. Super-naturalinstructions: Gen- eralization via declarative instructions on 1600+ NLP tasks. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 5085-5109. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, An- drew M. Dai, and Quoc V. Le. 2022. Finetuned lan- guage models are zero-shot learners. In Proceedings of ICLR.
  77. Jerry Wei, Chengrun Yang, Xinying Song, Yifeng Lu, Nathan Hu, Dustin Tran, Daiyi Peng, Ruibo Liu, Da Huang, Cosmo Du, et al. 2024. Long-form fac- tuality in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18802. · arXiv
  78. Fangyuan Xu, Yixiao Song, Mohit Iyyer, and Eunsol Choi. 2023a. A critical evaluation of evaluations for long-form question answering. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 3225-3245. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Shicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2023b. Search-in-the-chain: To- wards the accurate, credible and traceable content generation for complex knowledge-intensive tasks. CoRR, abs/2304.14732. · DOI
  80. Wenhao Yu, Dan Iter, Shuohang Wang, Yichong Xu, Mingxuan Ju, Soumya Sanyal, Chenguang Zhu, Michael Zeng, and Meng Jiang. 2023b. Gener- ate rather than retrieve: Large language models are strong context generators. In Proceedings of ICLR.
  81. Zheng Yuan, Hongyi Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang, Songfang Huang, and Fei Huang. 2023. RRHF: Rank responses to align language models with human feed- back without tears. CoRR, abs/2304.05302. · DOI · Paper page
  82. Shiyue Zhang and Mohit Bansal. 2021. Finding a bal- anced degree of automation for summary evaluation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 6617-6632. · DOI
  83. Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Wein- berger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. BERTScore: Evalu- ating text generation with BERT. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09675. · arXiv
  84. Xiaoyu Zhang, Ruobing Xie, Yougang Lyu, Xin Xin, Pengjie Ren, Mingfei Liang, Bo Zhang, Zhanhui Kang, Maarten de Rijke, and Zhaochun Ren. 2024. Towards empathetic conversational recommender sys- tems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10527. · arXiv
  85. Yichi Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Yin Fang, Lei Cheng, Yanxi Lu, Fangming Li, Wen Zhang, and Huajun Chen. 2023a. Knowledgeable preference alignment for llms in domain-specific question answering. CoRR, abs/2311.06503. · DOI
  86. Yue Zhang, Ming Zhang, Haipeng Yuan, Shichun Liu, Yongyao Shi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, and Xuanjing Huang. 2023b. LLMEval: A preliminary study on how to evaluate large language models. CoRR, abs/2312.07398. · DOI
  87. Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Tianqi Liu, Misha Khalman, Mohammad Saleh, and Peter J. Liu. 2023. SLiC-HF: Sequence likelihood calibration with human feed- back. CoRR, abs/2305.10425. · DOI · Paper page
  88. Yukun Zhao, Lingyong Yan, Weiwei Sun, Guoliang Xing, Shuaiqiang Wang, Chong Meng, Zhicong Cheng, Zhaochun Ren, and Dawei Yin. 2024. Im- proving the robustness of large language models via consistency alignment. In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computa- tional Linguistics, Language Resources and Evalua- tion, LREC/COLING 2024, 20-25 May, 2024, Torino, Italy, pages 8931-8941.
  89. Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Zhanghao Wu, Yonghao Zhuang, Zi Lin, Zhuohan Li, Dacheng Li, Eric P. Xing, Hao Zhang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. 2024a. Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. Proceedings of NeurIPS, 36.
  90. Yaowei Zheng, Richong Zhang, Junhao Zhang, Yanhan Ye, Zheyan Luo, and Yongqiang Ma. 2024b. Lla- maFactory: Unified efficient fine-tuning of 100+ lan- guage models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13372. · arXiv
  91. Haoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2020. JEC- QA: A legal-domain question answering dataset. In Proceedings of AAAI, volume 34, pages 9701-9708.
  92. Qihuang Zhong, Liang Ding, Juhua Liu, Bo Du, and Dacheng Tao. 2023. Can ChatGPT understand too? A comparative study on ChatGPT and fine-tuned BERT. CoRR, abs/2302.10198. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyu, Y., Yan, L., Wang, S., Shi, H., Yin, D., Ren, P., Chen, Z., de Rijke, M., & Ren, Z.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Baidu (China) (CN)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392011492
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission (101070212)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62102234, 62272274, 62202271, 62072279)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.004.022, NWA.1389.20.183, KICH3.LTP.20.006)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QF129)
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
large language models, knowledge improvement, knowledge comparison, factual accuracy, logical consistency, medical question answering, knowledge-intensive tasks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review