PreprintCited by 1Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Dude, Where's My (Autonomous) Car? Defining an Accessible Description Logic for Blind and Low Vision Travelers Using Autonomous Vehicles

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are becoming a promising transportation solution for blind and low-vision (BLV) travelers, offering the potential for greater independent mobility. This paper explores the information needs of BLV users across multiple steps of the transportation journey, including finding and navigating to, entering, and exiting vehicles independently. Methods: A survey with 202 BLV respondents and interviews with 12 BLV individuals revealed the perspectives of BLV end-users and informed the sequencing of natural language information required for successful travel. Whereas the survey identified key information needs across the three trip segments, the interviews helped prioritize how that information should be presented in a sequence of accessible descriptions to travelers. Results: Taken together, the survey and interviews reveal that BLV users prioritize knowing the vehicle's make and model and how to find the correct vehicle during the navigation phase. They also emphasize the importance of confirmations about the vehicle's destination and onboard safety features upon entering the vehicle. While exiting, BLV users value information about hazards and obstacles, as well as knowing which side of the vehicle to exit. Furthermore, results highlight that BLV travelers desire using their own smartphone devices when receiving information from AVs and prefer audio-based interaction. Conclusion: The findings from this research contribute a structured framework for delivering trip-related information to BLV users, useful for designers incorporating natural language descriptions tailored to each travel segment. This work offers important contributions for sequencing transportation-related descriptions throughout the AV journey, ultimately enhancing the mobility and independence of BLV individuals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.14911

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results build on existing work exploring accessibility during the entry portion of the trip with AVs, suggesting the important role that new multisensory tools can play, while challenging assertions that audio-only interactions are preferred by BLV travelers.

    “Taken together, the results presented here build on existing work exploring accessibility during the entry portion of the trip with AVs [9], suggesting the important role that new multisensory tools can play, while challenging assertions that audio-only interactions are preferred by BLV travelers.”

    From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fink et al. did not experimentally test the identified description logic to measure its usability or impact on user performance.

    “they did not experimentally test the identified logic to measure its usability or impact on user performance.”
  • The prior work derived results from interviews and surveys but did not experimentally test the logic through formal behavioral studies.

    “While commendable, the prior work derived results from interviews and surveys with participants but did not experimentally test the logic through formal behavioral studies (as we seek to do here).”
  • Researchers have identified information important for each trip segment and proposed a progression and ordering of this information for future AV deployments, dubbed a 'description logic'.

    “Through participatory design methods, researchers have also identified information important for each of these trip segments and proposed a progression and ordering of this information for future AV deployments, which they dub a ‘description logic’ [9].”
  • The prior work relied exclusively on audio-based descriptions instead of leveraging multisensory VAMs.

    “Moreover, the project relied exclusively on audio-based descriptions instead of leveraging the body of work suggesting the advantages of multisensory VAMs, as reviewed in the following.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1][1] Ahmetovic, D., Oh, U., Mascetti, S. and Asakawa, C. 2018. Turn Right: Analysis of Rotation Errors in Turn-by-Turn Navigation for Individuals with Visual Impairments. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway Ireland, Oct. 2018), 333 -339. -
  2. [2][2] Bennett, R., Vijaygopal, R. and Kottasz, R. 2020. Willingness of people who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: An empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour . 69, (Feb. 2020), 13 -27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.012. - · DOI
  3. [3][3] Bourne, R. et al. 2021. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health . 9, 2 (Feb. 2021), e130 -e143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3. - · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4][4] Braun, V. and and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology . 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77 -101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6][6] Brewer, R.N., Austin, A.M. and Ellison, N.B. 2019. Stories from the Front Seat: Supporting Accessible Transportation in the Sharing Economy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359197. - · DOI
  6. [7][7] Brewer, R.N. and Kameswaran, V. 2018. Understanding the Power of Control in Autonomous Vehicles for People with Vision Impairment. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway Ireland, Oct. 2018), 185 -197. -
  7. [8][8] Brewer, R.N. and Kameswaran, V. 2019. Understanding Trust, Transportation, and Accessibility through Ridesharing. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ' 19 (Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019), 1 -11. -
  8. [9][9] Brinkley, J., Huff, E.W., Posadas, B., Woodward, J., Daily, S.B. and Gilbert, J.E. 2020. Exploring the Needs, Preferences, and Concerns of Persons with Visual Impairments Regarding Autonomous Vehicles. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 13, 1 (Apr. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3372280. - · DOI
  9. [10][10] Brinkley, J., Posadas, B., Sherman, I., Daily, S.B. and Gilbert, J.E. 2019. An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human -Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users. International Journal of Human -Computer Interaction . 35, 11 (Jul. 2019), 1018 -1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787. - · DOI · Paper page
  10. [11][11] Brinkley, J., Posadas, B., Woodward, J. and Gilbert, J.E. 2017. Opinions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles: Results of Focus Group Discussions. Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore Maryland USA, Oct. 2017), 290 -299. -
  11. [12][12] Bu, L., Cui, B., Pan, W., Chen, H., Xia, S. and Li, H. 2025. User-centered multimodal interaction design for autonomous vehicles: a focus on cognitive load and accessibility for users with severe visual impairment. Universal Access in the Information Society . (Jun. 2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-025-01240-4. - · DOI · Paper page
  12. [14][14] Detjen, H., Schneegass, S., Geisler, S., Kun, A. and Sundar, V. 2022. An Emergent Design Framework for Accessible and Inclusive Future Mobility. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (New York, NY, USA, 2022), 1 -12. -
  13. [16][16] El-taher, F.E., Taha, A., Courtney, J. and Mckeever, S. 2021. A Systematic Review of Urban Navigation Systems for Visually Impaired People. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) . 21, 9 (Apr. 2021), 3103. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093103. - · DOI
  14. [17][17] Fink, P.D.S. 2023. Accessible Autonomy: Exploring Inclusive Autonomous Vehicle Design and Interaction for People Who Are Blind and Visually Impaired . Doctoral Thesis #3817. The University of Maine. -
  15. [18][18] Fink, P.D.S., Alsamsam, M., Brown, J.R., Kindler, H.D. and Giudice, N.A. 2023. Give us something to chauffeur it: Exploring user needs in traditional and fully autonomous ridesharing for people who are blind or visually impaired. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour . 98, (Oct. 2023), 91 -103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.09.004. - · DOI
  16. [19][19] Fink, P.D.S., Dimitrov, V., Yasuda, H., Chen, T.L., Corey, R.R., Giudice, N.A. and Sumner, E.S. 2023. Autonomous is Not Enough: Designing Multisensory Mid-Air Gestures for Vehicle Interactions Among People with Visual Impairments. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2023), 1 -13. -
  17. [20][20] Fink, P.D.S., Doore, S.A., Lin, X., Maring, M., Zhao, P., Nygaard, A., Beals, G., Corey, R.R., Perry, R.J., Freund, K., Dimitrov, V. and Giudice, N.A. 2023. The Autonomous Vehicle Assistant (AVA): Emerging technology design supporting blind and visually impaired travelers in autonomous transportation. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies . 179, (Nov. 2023), 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103125. - · DOI · Paper page
  18. [21][21] Fink, P.D.S., Holz, J.A. and Giudice, N.A. 2021. Fully Autonomous Vehicles for People with Visual Impairment: Policy, Accessibility, and Future Directions. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 14, 3 (Aug. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3471934. - · DOI · Paper page
  19. [22][22] Fink, P.D.S., Milne, H., Caccese, A., Alsamsam, M., Loranger, J., Colley, M. and Giudice, N.A. 2024. Accessible Maps for the Future of Inclusive Ridesharing. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Stanford CA USA, Sep. 2024), 106 -115. -
  20. [23][23] Giudice, N.A. and Long, R.G. 2010. Establishing and maintaining orientation: tools, techniques, and technologies. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, 4th ed.; APH Press: Louisville, KY, USA . 1, (2010), 45 -62. -
  21. [24][24] Kacperski, C., Kutzner, F. and Vogel, T. 2024. Comparing autonomous vehicle acceptance of German residents with and without visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology . 19, 8 (Nov. 2024), 2869 -2879. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2317930. - · DOI
  22. [25][25] Kim, K.J. and Wang, S. 2025. Regional differences in public perceptions of autonomous vehicles facing moral dilemmas: a comparative study between the United States, Hong Kong, and China. Universal Access in the Information Society . 24, 2 (Jun. 2025), 1369 -1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01145-8. - · DOI
  23. [26][26] Klatzky, R.L., Marston, J.R., Giudice, N.A., Golledge, R.G. and Loomis, J.M. 2006. Cognitive load of navigating without vision when guided by virtual sound versus spatial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied . 12, 4 (2006), 223 -232. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.4.223. - · DOI
  24. [27][27] Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Philbeck, J.W. and Golledge, R.G. 1998. Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception & Psychophysics . 60, 6 (1998), 966 -980. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211932. - · DOI
  25. [28][28] Ma, Z., Schroeter, R. and Gomez, R. 2024. Designing HMI for BVI Users in Fully Automated Vehicles: A Participatory and In-the-field Approach. The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (St. John ' s NL Canada, Oct. 2024), 1 -5. -
  26. [29][29] Meinhardt, L.-M., Rück, M., Zähnle, J., Elhaidary, M., Colley, M., Rietzler, M. and Rukzio, E. 2024. Hey, What ' s Going On? Conveying Traffic Information to People with Visual Impairments in Highly Automated Vehicles: Introducing OnBoard. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 8, 2 (May 2024), 67:1-67:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3659618. - · DOI · Paper page
  27. [30][30] Meinhardt, L.-M., Weilke, L.M., Elhaidary, M., von Abel, J., Fink, P.D.S., Rietzler, M., Colley, M. and Rukzio, E. 2025. Light My Way: Developing and Exploring a Multimodal Interface to Assist People With Visual Impairments to Exit Highly Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2025). -
  28. [31][31] Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E. and Antoniou, C. 2020. Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies . 111, (Feb. 2020), 255 -293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008. - · DOI · Paper page
  29. [32][32] Palani, H.P., Fink, P.D. and Giudice, N.A. 2021. Comparing Map Learning Between Touchscreen-Based Visual and Haptic Displays: A Behavioral Evaluation with Blind and Sighted Users. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction . 6, 1 (2021), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6010001. - · DOI · Paper page
  30. [33][33] Rampin, R. and Rampin, V. 2021. Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis. Journal of Open Source Software . 6, 68 (Dec. 2021), 3522. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03522. - · DOI
  31. [34][34] Ranjbar, P., Krishnakumari, P.K., Andersson, J. and Klingegård, M. 2022. Vibrotactile guidance for trips with autonomous vehicles for persons with blindness, deafblindness, and deafness. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives . 15, (Sep. 2022), 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100630. - · DOI
  32. [35][35] Son, S., Jeong, Y. and Lee, B. 2019. An Audification and Visualization System (AVS) of an Autonomous Vehicle for Blind and Deaf People Based on Deep Learning. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) . 19, 22 (Nov. 2019), 5035. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225035. - · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fink, P. D. S., Brown, J. R., Coombs, R., Hamby, E. A., James, K. J., Harris, A., Bond, J., Andrulis, M. E., & Giudice, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maine (US)
  • General Motors (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7092300432
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, information needs, natural language descriptions, audio-based interaction, smartphone accessibility, independent mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review