The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Dude, Where's My (Autonomous) Car? Defining an Accessible Description Logic for Blind and Low Vision Travelers Using Autonomous Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are becoming a promising transportation solution for blind and low-vision (BLV) travelers, offering the potential for greater independent mobility. This paper explores the information needs of BLV users across multiple steps of the transportation journey, including finding and navigating to, entering, and exiting vehicles independently. Methods: A survey with 202 BLV respondents and interviews with 12 BLV individuals revealed the perspectives of BLV end-users and informed the sequencing of natural language information required for successful travel. Whereas the survey identified key information needs across the three trip segments, the interviews helped prioritize how that information should be presented in a sequence of accessible descriptions to travelers. Results: Taken together, the survey and interviews reveal that BLV users prioritize knowing the vehicle's make and model and how to find the correct vehicle during the navigation phase. They also emphasize the importance of confirmations about the vehicle's destination and onboard safety features upon entering the vehicle. While exiting, BLV users value information about hazards and obstacles, as well as knowing which side of the vehicle to exit. Furthermore, results highlight that BLV travelers desire using their own smartphone devices when receiving information from AVs and prefer audio-based interaction. Conclusion: The findings from this research contribute a structured framework for delivering trip-related information to BLV users, useful for designers incorporating natural language descriptions tailored to each travel segment. This work offers important contributions for sequencing transportation-related descriptions throughout the AV journey, ultimately enhancing the mobility and independence of BLV individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The results build on existing work exploring accessibility during the entry portion of the trip with AVs, suggesting the important role that new multisensory tools can play, while challenging assertions that audio-only interactions are preferred by BLV travelers.
“Taken together, the results presented here build on existing work exploring accessibility during the entry portion of the trip with AVs [9], suggesting the important role that new multisensory tools can play, while challenging assertions that audio-only interactions are preferred by BLV travelers.”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFink et al. did not experimentally test the identified description logic to measure its usability or impact on user performance.
“they did not experimentally test the identified logic to measure its usability or impact on user performance.”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The prior work derived results from interviews and surveys but did not experimentally test the logic through formal behavioral studies.
“While commendable, the prior work derived results from interviews and surveys with participants but did not experimentally test the logic through formal behavioral studies (as we seek to do here).”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Researchers have identified information important for each trip segment and proposed a progression and ordering of this information for future AV deployments, dubbed a 'description logic'.
“Through participatory design methods, researchers have also identified information important for each of these trip segments and proposed a progression and ordering of this information for future AV deployments, which they dub a ‘description logic’ [9].”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The prior work relied exclusively on audio-based descriptions instead of leveraging multisensory VAMs.
“Moreover, the project relied exclusively on audio-based descriptions instead of leveraging the body of work suggesting the advantages of multisensory VAMs, as reviewed in the following.”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Fink et al. identified a 'description logic' for the entering and seat localization phase.
“While the authors identified a ‘description logic’ for the entering and seat localization phase”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Fink et al. called for future work to compare their audio-only approach to multisensory interfaces.
“Moreover, the authors called for future work to compare their audio-only approach to multisensory interfaces given recent results emphasizing the utility of multisensory information in AVs for BLV users [13, 17, 18].”
From Get In Touch with Your Seat: Accessible Seat Localization for Blind and Low Vision Travelers in Autonomous Shuttles (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [1][1] Ahmetovic, D., Oh, U., Mascetti, S. and Asakawa, C. 2018. Turn Right: Analysis of Rotation Errors in Turn-by-Turn Navigation for Individuals with Visual Impairments. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway Ireland, Oct. 2018), 333 -339. -
- [2][2] Bennett, R., Vijaygopal, R. and Kottasz, R. 2020. Willingness of people who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: An empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour . 69, (Feb. 2020), 13 -27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.012. - · DOI
- [3][3] Bourne, R. et al. 2021. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health . 9, 2 (Feb. 2021), e130 -e143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3. - · DOI · Paper page
- [4][4] Braun, V. and and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology . 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77 -101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - · DOI · Paper page
- [6][6] Brewer, R.N., Austin, A.M. and Ellison, N.B. 2019. Stories from the Front Seat: Supporting Accessible Transportation in the Sharing Economy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (Nov. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359197. - · DOI
- [7][7] Brewer, R.N. and Kameswaran, V. 2018. Understanding the Power of Control in Autonomous Vehicles for People with Vision Impairment. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway Ireland, Oct. 2018), 185 -197. -
- [8][8] Brewer, R.N. and Kameswaran, V. 2019. Understanding Trust, Transportation, and Accessibility through Ridesharing. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ' 19 (Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 2019), 1 -11. -
- [9][9] Brinkley, J., Huff, E.W., Posadas, B., Woodward, J., Daily, S.B. and Gilbert, J.E. 2020. Exploring the Needs, Preferences, and Concerns of Persons with Visual Impairments Regarding Autonomous Vehicles. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 13, 1 (Apr. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3372280. - · DOI
- [10][10] Brinkley, J., Posadas, B., Sherman, I., Daily, S.B. and Gilbert, J.E. 2019. An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human -Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users. International Journal of Human -Computer Interaction . 35, 11 (Jul. 2019), 1018 -1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787. - · DOI · Paper page
- [11][11] Brinkley, J., Posadas, B., Woodward, J. and Gilbert, J.E. 2017. Opinions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles: Results of Focus Group Discussions. Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore Maryland USA, Oct. 2017), 290 -299. -
- [12][12] Bu, L., Cui, B., Pan, W., Chen, H., Xia, S. and Li, H. 2025. User-centered multimodal interaction design for autonomous vehicles: a focus on cognitive load and accessibility for users with severe visual impairment. Universal Access in the Information Society . (Jun. 2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-025-01240-4. - · DOI · Paper page
- [14][14] Detjen, H., Schneegass, S., Geisler, S., Kun, A. and Sundar, V. 2022. An Emergent Design Framework for Accessible and Inclusive Future Mobility. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (New York, NY, USA, 2022), 1 -12. -
- [16][16] El-taher, F.E., Taha, A., Courtney, J. and Mckeever, S. 2021. A Systematic Review of Urban Navigation Systems for Visually Impaired People. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) . 21, 9 (Apr. 2021), 3103. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093103. - · DOI
- [17][17] Fink, P.D.S. 2023. Accessible Autonomy: Exploring Inclusive Autonomous Vehicle Design and Interaction for People Who Are Blind and Visually Impaired . Doctoral Thesis #3817. The University of Maine. -
- [18][18] Fink, P.D.S., Alsamsam, M., Brown, J.R., Kindler, H.D. and Giudice, N.A. 2023. Give us something to chauffeur it: Exploring user needs in traditional and fully autonomous ridesharing for people who are blind or visually impaired. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour . 98, (Oct. 2023), 91 -103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.09.004. - · DOI
- [19][19] Fink, P.D.S., Dimitrov, V., Yasuda, H., Chen, T.L., Corey, R.R., Giudice, N.A. and Sumner, E.S. 2023. Autonomous is Not Enough: Designing Multisensory Mid-Air Gestures for Vehicle Interactions Among People with Visual Impairments. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2023), 1 -13. -
- [20][20] Fink, P.D.S., Doore, S.A., Lin, X., Maring, M., Zhao, P., Nygaard, A., Beals, G., Corey, R.R., Perry, R.J., Freund, K., Dimitrov, V. and Giudice, N.A. 2023. The Autonomous Vehicle Assistant (AVA): Emerging technology design supporting blind and visually impaired travelers in autonomous transportation. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies . 179, (Nov. 2023), 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103125. - · DOI · Paper page
- [21][21] Fink, P.D.S., Holz, J.A. and Giudice, N.A. 2021. Fully Autonomous Vehicles for People with Visual Impairment: Policy, Accessibility, and Future Directions. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 14, 3 (Aug. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3471934. - · DOI · Paper page
- [22][22] Fink, P.D.S., Milne, H., Caccese, A., Alsamsam, M., Loranger, J., Colley, M. and Giudice, N.A. 2024. Accessible Maps for the Future of Inclusive Ridesharing. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Stanford CA USA, Sep. 2024), 106 -115. -
- [23][23] Giudice, N.A. and Long, R.G. 2010. Establishing and maintaining orientation: tools, techniques, and technologies. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, 4th ed.; APH Press: Louisville, KY, USA . 1, (2010), 45 -62. -
- [24][24] Kacperski, C., Kutzner, F. and Vogel, T. 2024. Comparing autonomous vehicle acceptance of German residents with and without visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology . 19, 8 (Nov. 2024), 2869 -2879. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2317930. - · DOI
- [25][25] Kim, K.J. and Wang, S. 2025. Regional differences in public perceptions of autonomous vehicles facing moral dilemmas: a comparative study between the United States, Hong Kong, and China. Universal Access in the Information Society . 24, 2 (Jun. 2025), 1369 -1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01145-8. - · DOI
- [26][26] Klatzky, R.L., Marston, J.R., Giudice, N.A., Golledge, R.G. and Loomis, J.M. 2006. Cognitive load of navigating without vision when guided by virtual sound versus spatial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied . 12, 4 (2006), 223 -232. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.4.223. - · DOI
- [27][27] Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Philbeck, J.W. and Golledge, R.G. 1998. Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception & Psychophysics . 60, 6 (1998), 966 -980. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211932. - · DOI
- [28][28] Ma, Z., Schroeter, R. and Gomez, R. 2024. Designing HMI for BVI Users in Fully Automated Vehicles: A Participatory and In-the-field Approach. The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (St. John ' s NL Canada, Oct. 2024), 1 -5. -
- [29][29] Meinhardt, L.-M., Rück, M., Zähnle, J., Elhaidary, M., Colley, M., Rietzler, M. and Rukzio, E. 2024. Hey, What ' s Going On? Conveying Traffic Information to People with Visual Impairments in Highly Automated Vehicles: Introducing OnBoard. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 8, 2 (May 2024), 67:1-67:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3659618. - · DOI · Paper page
- [30][30] Meinhardt, L.-M., Weilke, L.M., Elhaidary, M., von Abel, J., Fink, P.D.S., Rietzler, M., Colley, M. and Rukzio, E. 2025. Light My Way: Developing and Exploring a Multimodal Interface to Assist People With Visual Impairments to Exit Highly Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2025). -
- [31][31] Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E. and Antoniou, C. 2020. Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies . 111, (Feb. 2020), 255 -293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008. - · DOI · Paper page
- [32][32] Palani, H.P., Fink, P.D. and Giudice, N.A. 2021. Comparing Map Learning Between Touchscreen-Based Visual and Haptic Displays: A Behavioral Evaluation with Blind and Sighted Users. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction . 6, 1 (2021), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6010001. - · DOI · Paper page
- [33][33] Rampin, R. and Rampin, V. 2021. Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis. Journal of Open Source Software . 6, 68 (Dec. 2021), 3522. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03522. - · DOI
- [34][34] Ranjbar, P., Krishnakumari, P.K., Andersson, J. and Klingegård, M. 2022. Vibrotactile guidance for trips with autonomous vehicles for persons with blindness, deafblindness, and deafness. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives . 15, (Sep. 2022), 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100630. - · DOI
- [35][35] Son, S., Jeong, Y. and Lee, B. 2019. An Audification and Visualization System (AVS) of an Autonomous Vehicle for Blind and Deaf People Based on Deep Learning. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) . 19, 22 (Nov. 2019), 5035. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225035. - · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D. S. Fink, P., R Brown, J., M Movalia, R., J James, K., E Kastelein, M., Bond, J., E Andrulis, M., & A Giudice, N. (2026) · Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798714
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, P. D. S., Brown, J. R., Coombs, R., Hamby, E. A., James, K. J., Harris, A., Bond, J., Andrulis, M. E., & Giudice, N. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Maine (US)
- General Motors (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2510.14911
- OpenAlex
- W7092300432
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, information needs, natural language descriptions, audio-based interaction, smartphone accessibility, independent mobility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review