Cited by 22COVID-19 and Mental HealthPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Indonesian Version of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Validity and Reliability

Open access
Mohd Kassim, Mohd Amiruddin, Ayu, Friska, Kamu, Assis, Pang, Nicholas Tze Ping, Ho, Chong Mun, Algristian, Hafid, Sahri, Moch, Hambali, Nurfarah Lydia +1 more·2020·Borneo Epidemiology Journal

Abstract

Background and Objective: The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) is a seven-item uni-dimensional scale assessing the severity of COVID-19 concerns. A translation and validation of the FCV-19S in Bahasa Indonesia language was expedited in view of the worrying trends of COVID-19 in Indonesia as well as its psychological squeal. Methods: Formal WHO forward and backward translation sequences were applied in translating the English FCV-19S into Bahasa Indonesia. Indonesian university participants were recruited via convenience sampling online using snowball methods. The reliability and validity of the Indonesian FCV-19S was psychometrically evaluated by applying confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis in relation to sociodemographic variables and response to the depression, anxiety, and stress components of the Indonesian version of DASS-21. The sample consisted of 434 Indonesian participants. Results: The Cronbach α value for the Indonesia FCV-19-I was 0.819 indicated very good internal reliability. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the uni-dimensional factor structure of the FCV19S fitted well with the data. The FCV-19-I was significantly correlated with anxiety (r= 0.705, p< 0.001) subscales of DASS-21. The FCV-19-I’s properties tested using Rasch analysis were also satisfactory, although three items in FCV-19-I were not able to be tested. Conclusion: Hence, the Indonesian FCV-19-I is valid and reliable, with robust psychometric properties from classical and modern psychometric methods. It can be a valuable and useful tool in identifying and responding to psychological distress caused by COVID-19.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51200/bej.v1i2.2755

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohd Kassim, M. A., Ayu, F., Kamu, A., Pang, N. T. P., Ho, C. M., Algristian, H., Sahri, M., Hambali, N. L., & Omar, A.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya (ID)
  • Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY)
Venue
Borneo Epidemiology Journal
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
124-135
ISSN
  • 2716-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 2735-0266
OpenAlex
W3172550834
Cited by
22
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Borneo Epidemiology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UMS Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sabah) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Fear of COVID-19 Scale, COVID-19 pandemic, fear of infection, scale translation, psychometric validation, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, DASS-21, Rasch analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Indonesian language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review