Cited by 313COVID-19 and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale

Open access
Alyami, Mohsen, Henning, Marcus, Krägeloh, Christian U., Alyami, Hussain·2021·International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Abstract

Fear is a central emotional response to imminent threats such as the coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19). The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) assesses the severity of fear towards COVID-19. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the FCV-19S. Using a forward-backward translation, the FCV-19S was translated into Arabic. An online survey using the Arabic versions of FCV-19S and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was administered. Reliability and concurrent and confirmatory validity were examined. The dataset consisted of 693 Saudi participants. The internal consistency of the Arabic FCV-19S was satisfactory (α = .88), with sound concurrent validity indicated by significant and positive correlations with HADS (r = .66). The unidimensional structure of the FCV-19S was confirmed. The Arabic version of the FCV-19S is psychometrically robust and can be used in research assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 among a Saudi adult population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11469-020-00316-x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Fear of COVID-19 Scale has good psychometric properties, with Cronbach's α values from 0.82 to 0.89 across studies.

    “The scale has already been used in a number of studies and has been translated into several languages, showing good psychometric properties and Cronbach’s α values from 0.82 to 0.89 (Alyami et al., 2020; Bitan et al., 2020; Sakib et al., 2020; Satici et al., 2020; Soraci et al., 2020; Winter et al., 2020).”

    From Intolerance of Uncertainty and Tendency to Worry as Mediators Between Trust in Institutions and Social Support and Fear of Coronavirus and Consequences of the Pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Alyami et al., 2020

    The Discussion reports good psychometric properties and Cronbach’s α values of .82 for the original scale, .85–.87 for other translated versions, and .88 for the Arabic version. It does not report an α of .89, so this source supports the general point but not the stated upper end of the range. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The FCV-19S has been used in a wide range of countries.

    “This scale has been used in a wide range of countries, such as Iran (Alyami et al., 2020), Bangladesh (Sakib et al., 2020), Italy (Soraci et al., 2020), Turkey (Satici et al., 2020), Russia and Belarus (Reznik et al., 2020), Israel (Tzur Bitan et al., 2020), Peru (Huarcaya-Victoria et al., 2020), and Paraguay (Barrios et al., 2020).”
  • Most studies using the FCV-19S detected a link between fear of COVID-19 and anxiety and, to a lesser extent, depression.

    “Most of these studies also detected a link between fear of COVID-19 and anxiety (Mertens et al., 2020) and, to a lesser extent, depression, using both the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Ahorsu et al., 2020; Alyami et al., 2020) and the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alyami, M., Henning, M., Krägeloh, C. U., & Alyami, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • Taif University (SA)
Corresponding author
Alyami, Mohsen
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2020-05-16
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
2219-2232
ISSN
  • 1557-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1882
OpenAlex
W3025028506
Cited by
313
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 40
FWCI
29.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Fear of COVID-19 Scale, fear of COVID-19, Arabic translation, psychometric validation, cross-cultural adaptation, anxiety, depression, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Saudi adults, psychological impact of COVID-19

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review