The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design
Open accessAbstract
Over the last few years, the term ‘smart cities’ has gained traction in academic, industry, and policy debates about the deployment of new media technologies in urban settings. It is mostly used to describe and market technologies that make city infrastructures more efficient, and personalize the experience of the city. Here, we want to propose the notion of ‘ownership’ as a lens to take an alternative look at the role of urban new media in the city. With the notion of ownership we seek to investigate how digital media and culture allow citizens to engage with, organize around and act upon collective issues and engage in co–creating the social fabric and built form of the city. Taking ownership as the point of departure, we wish to broaden the debate about the role of new media technologies in urban design from an infrastructural to a social point of view, or from ‘city management’ to ‘city making.’
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“Because of this complexity such issues have been called ‘wicked problems’ (Rittel and Webber, 1973).”
BackgroundWill the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?
Hollands, R. G. (2008) · City · doi:10.1080/13604810802479126 · Cited by 3,025
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y. (2012) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 · Cited by 2,424
Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x · Cited by 890 · cited 1×
“This narrative is inspired by the body of literature that describes profound shifts in the balance between production and consumption: from professional amateur to wisdom of the crowd, from do–it–yourself culture to the hacker ethic (Himanen, 2001; Leadbeater and Miller, 2004; Benkler and Nissenbaum, 2006; Shirky, 200…”
Background
Cited by
Critical interventions into the corporate smart city
Hollands, R. G. (2015) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu011 · Cited by 931
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019) · Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space · doi:10.1177/0263774x18806508 · Cited by 438
Trencher, G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033 · Cited by 350
Social Media data: Challenges, opportunities and limitations in urban studies
Martí, P., Serrano-Estrada, L., & Nolasco-Cirugeda, A. (2019) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.001 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- De Lange, M., & De Waal, M.
- Venue
- First Monday
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 2013-11-25
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- 1396-0466
- OpenAlex
- W2046100206
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5210/fm.v18i11.4954
- The paper
- De Lange, M., & De Waal, M. (2013). Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i11.4954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
