The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What types of COVID-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots?
Open accessAbstract
With people moving out of physical public spaces due to containment measures to tackle the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, online platforms become even more prominent tools to understand social discussion. Studying social media can be informative to assess how we are collectively coping with this unprecedented global crisis. However, social media platforms are also populated by bots, automated accounts that can amplify certain topics of discussion at the expense of others. In this paper, we study 43.3M English tweets about COVID-19 and provide early evidence of the use of bots to promote political conspiracies in the United States, in stark contrast with humans who focus on public health concerns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Twitter bots utilizing COVID-19 content to spread political conspiracies [34]”
From Future directions for chatbot research: An interdisciplinary research agenda (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 1×
“tc.). The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accounts [5], [6], [14]–[17]. In this paper, we chart the landscape…”
BackgroundSocial Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211 · Cited by 6,767
First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States
Holshue, M. L., DeBolt, C., Lindquist, S., Lofy, K. H., Wiesman, J., Bruce, H., Spitters, C., Ericson, K., Wilkerson, S., Tural, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001191 · Cited by 6,030 · cited 2×
“tion on February 11, 2020) were reported in Wuhan, China in late December 2019; the first fatalities were reported in early 2020. The first case in the United States was announced on January 21, 2020 [18]: our Twitter data collection aligns with that date [19]. The fast-rising infection rates and death toll led the Ch…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak
Gao, J., Zheng, P., Jia, Y., Chen, H., Mao, Y., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Fu, H., & Dai, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231924 · Cited by 2,830 · cited 3×
“On a different note, [23] looked at social media sentiment as expression of potential mental health issues associated with social isolation and other side-effects of containment measures enacted to limit the spread of COVID-19 in China.”
BackgroundInfluentialMental Health Problems and Social Media Exposure During COVID-19 Outbreak
Gao, J., Zheng, P., Jia, Y., Chen, H., Mao, Y., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Fu, H., & Dai, J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3541120 · Cited by 2,830
The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis
Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248506 · Cited by 2,523 · cited 1×
“ve a digital trail associated with the data center used to dispatch tweets. RQ2: CHARACTERIZING BOT FUELED CAMPAIGNS Data-driven computational sensemaking can fail when using human communication data [66]. Common reasons include population and sampling bias, platform-design bias, distortion of human and nonhuman behav…”
The spreading of misinformation online
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113 · Cited by 2,407 · cited 2×
“[74] M.”
BackgroundThe COVID-19 social media infodemic
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5 · Cited by 2,313
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2818717 · Cited by 1,973 · cited 4×
“The literature on bot detection has become very extensive [31], [36], [49]–[51].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationFake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2706 · Cited by 1,803 · cited 1×
“[12] N.”
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620939054 · Cited by 1,715 · cited 2×
“The work by Pennycook and colleagues epitomizes the seriousness of this problem by showing, with a social experiment including 1,600 participants, that subjects tend to share misinformation and false claims about COVID-19 predominantly because they are unable to determine whether the content is scientifically sound an…”
BackgroundWeaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate
Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304567 · Cited by 1,149 · cited 3×
“According to work by [5], [42], similar conclusions can be drawn for bots active in public health discussions, with the intent to spread claims contrary to scientific evidence.”
BackgroundSocial bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion
Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090 · Cited by 993 · cited 1×
“ed by the activity of automated accounts, often referred to as bots (a.k.a., social bots, sybil accounts, etc.). The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], a…”
Self-citationBotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Bots
Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2016) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web - WWW 16 Companion · doi:10.1145/2872518.2889302 · Cited by 909 · cited 2×
“(1) Botometer3, also used here, is a bot-detection tool developed at Indiana University [52]; (2) BotSlayer4 is an application to detect and track potential manipulation of information on Twitter; (3) the Bot Repository5 is a centralized database to share annotated datasets of Twitter bots.”
MethodSelf-citationScience audiences, misinformation, and fake news
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115 · Cited by 878 · cited 1×
“idation section. The spread of conspiracies on online social media is a well-established issue. Numerous studies have been devoted to understand, for example, how unscientific claims circulate online [71]–[74], or how conspiratorial narratives are constructed online [75]–[77], especially in the context of political id…”
BackgroundIs the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose
Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14401 · Cited by 863 · cited 1×
“nly observing a small fraction, approximately 1%, of the overall Twitter conversation, through the lens of the Twitter API. This has been shown to introduce some biases toward over-represented topics [87], and COVID-19 has been the most spoken-about topic of discussion ever since the beginning of the pandemic. Second,…”
BackgroundChen, E., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2020) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/19273 · Cited by 852
Self-citationSocial media for large studies of behavior
Ruths, D., & Pfeffer, J. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.346.6213.1063 · Cited by 648 · cited 1×
“ation and sampling bias, platform-design bias, distortion of human and nonhuman behavior, multiple hypotheses and comparisons testing, and more, which can hamper computational models and bias results [67]. An hybrid approach based on combining computational analysis and human validation has been called for in order to…”
MethodScience vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation
Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 · Cited by 645 · cited 1×
“[72] A.”
Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to COVID-19 epidemics
Gallotti, R., Valle, F., Castaldo, N., Sacco, P., & De Domenico, M. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-00994-6 · Cited by 591
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x · Cited by 587
Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election
Ferrara, E. (2017) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v22i8.8005 · Cited by 524 · cited 2×
“oted to understand, for example, how unscientific claims circulate online [71]–[74], or how conspiratorial narratives are constructed online [75]–[77], especially in the context of political ideology [2], [78]. Our analysis highlights the emergence of similar issues in the context of the conversation related to COVID-…”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationDeep neural networks for bot detection
Kudugunta, S., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.019 · Cited by 506 · cited 1×
“centralized database to share annotated datasets of Twitter bots. Finally, various models have been proposed to detect bots using sophisticated machine learning techniques, such as: (1) Deep learning [53], (2) Anomaly detection [54]–[57], (3) Time series analysis [38], [58], [59]. Due to the continuously evolving natu…”
MethodSelf-citationBots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems
Stella, M., Ferrara, E., & De Domenico, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803470115 · Cited by 492 · cited 1×
“en referred to as bots (a.k.a., social bots, sybil accounts, etc.). The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accou…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe DARPA Twitter Bot Challenge
Subrahmanian, V. S., Azaria, A., Durst, S., Kagan, V., Galstyan, A., Lerman, K., Zhu, L., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2016) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2016.183 · Cited by 480 · cited 3×
“[4] V.”
BackgroundSelf-citationBoshmaf, Y., Muslukhov, I., Beznosov, K., & Ripeanu, M. (2011) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/2076732.2076746 · Cited by 458 · cited 1×
“esearch Projects Agency) aimed at detecting bots used for anti-science misinformation [4]. More recently, large bot networks (botnets) have been discovered on Twitter by various research groups [43], [44], [46], [48]. The literature on bot detection has become very extensive [31], [36], [49]–[51]. In [31], we proposed…”
BackgroundSuspended accounts in retrospect: an analysis of twitter spam
Thomas, K., Grier, C., Song, D., & Paxson, V. (2011) · Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference · doi:10.1145/2068816.2068840 · Cited by 439 · cited 2×
“nced Research Projects Agency) aimed at detecting bots used for anti-science misinformation [4]. More recently, large bot networks (botnets) have been discovered on Twitter by various research groups [43], [44], [46], [48]. The literature on bot detection has become very extensive [31], [36], [49]–[51]. In [31], we pr…”
BackgroundMethodArming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots
Yang, K., Varol, O., Davis, C. A., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.115 · Cited by 419 · cited 1×
“e identification of highly-predictive features that discriminate between bots and humans. Other recent surveys propose complementary or alternative taxonomies that are worth considering as well [36], [50], [51] Some openly accessible tools exist to detect bots on platforms like Twitter: (1) Botometer3, also used here,…”
MethodSelf-citationContent Analysis in an Era of Big Data: A Hybrid Approach to Computational and Manual Methods
Lewis, S., Zamith, R., & Hermida, A. (2013) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.761702 · Cited by 406 · cited 2×
“An hybrid approach based on combining computational analysis and human validation has been called for in order to make sense of massive-scale communication datasets [68], [69].”
MethodHoward, P. N., Woolley, S., & Calo, R. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735 · Cited by 398 · cited 1×
“r further details. Bot behavior research. Numerous studies have been devoted to characterize the behavior of bots [36]– [38] and the ethical issues pertaining their use [39]. E.g.: According to [30], [40], [41], the behavior of political bots can be categorized with respect to their goals: • Manufacturing consensus, t…”
BackgroundDynamical classes of collective attention in twitter
Lehmann, J., Gonçalves, B., Ramasco, J. J., & Cattuto, C. (2012) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187871 · Cited by 388 · cited 1×
“inuum of behavior along the dimensions of social media engagement is also in line with two other theories, namely the notions of “super-participation” [61] and that of “dynamical classes of behavior” [62]. In our case, we adopt the same idea to segmenting the dimension of human-to-bot likeness and dividing the continu…”
MethodBadawy, A., Ferrara, E., & Lerman, K. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2018.8508646 · Cited by 380 · cited 1×
“[15] A.”
Self-citation(2020) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5460 · Cited by 361
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1547 · Cited by 352 · cited 1×
“[73] D.”
Starbird, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14878 · Cited by 313 · cited 1×
“is a well-established issue. Numerous studies have been devoted to understand, for example, how unscientific claims circulate online [71]–[74], or how conspiratorial narratives are constructed online [75]–[77], especially in the context of political ideology [2], [78]. Our analysis highlights the emergence of similar…”
BackgroundAutomating power: Social bot interference in global politics
Woolley, S. (2016) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v21i4.6161 · Cited by 281 · cited 2×
“35] for further details. Bot behavior research. Numerous studies have been devoted to characterize the behavior of bots [36]– [38] and the ethical issues pertaining their use [39]. E.g.: According to [30], [40], [41], the behavior of political bots can be categorized with respect to their goals: • Manufacturing consen…”
BackgroundMethodUnpacking the Social Media Bot: A Typology to Guide Research and Policy
Gorwa, R., & Guilbeault, D. (2020) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.184 · Cited by 270 · cited 4×
“Bots have been categorized according to various taxonomies [29], [30].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDeBot: Twitter Bot Detection via Warped Correlation
Chavoshi, N., Hamooni, H., & Mueen, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) · doi:10.1109/icdm.2016.0096 · Cited by 260
Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa)
DiMaggio, P. (2015) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715602908 · Cited by 252 · cited 1×
“odels and bias results [67]. An hybrid approach based on combining computational analysis and human validation has been called for in order to make sense of massive-scale communication datasets [68], [69]. Content sensemaking. In this section, we address RQ2 using content and timeseries analysis techniques, in combina…”
MethodA first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on TwitterPreprint
Singh, L., Bansal, S., Bode, L., Budak, C., Chi, G., Kawintiranon, K., Padden, C., Vanarsdall, R., Vraga, E. K., & Wang, Y. (2020) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.13907 · Cited by 249 · cited 1×
“ch social media. The work by Singh and colleagues also looked at the spatio-temporal dynamics of misinformation spread on Twitter, drawing a picture with similar implications as the two studies above [26]. More research is needed, as the information landscape evolves, and more scientific insights are unveiled on the c…”
ResultSocial Media and the Elections
Metaxas, P., & Mustafaraj, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230456 · Cited by 245 · cited 1×
“ng bots appears to dissipate toward the end of our observation window (early March). This type of bot behavior has been documented already in the past, and is commonly related to as “trend hijacking” [85], [86]: bots appear to ride the wave of popularity of a given topic, in this case the trending COVID-19 discussion,…”
BackgroundDesign and analysis of a social botnet
Boshmaf, Y., Muslukhov, I., Beznosov, K., & Ripeanu, M. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.06.006 · Cited by 241 · cited 1×
“[45] Y.”
Bail, C. A., Guay, B., Maloney, E., Combs, A., Hillygus, D. S., Merhout, F., Freelon, D., & Volfovsky, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906420116 · Cited by 224 · cited 2×
“The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accounts [5], [6], [14]–[17].”
BackgroundLi, J., Xu, Q., Cuomo, R. E., Purushothaman, V. L., & Mackey, T. K. (2020) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/18700 · Cited by 199 · cited 2×
“As of the time of this writing (mid-April 2020), the vast majority of these studies are pre-print papers that provide a timely, yet partial, characterization of online discussion and issues revolving around COVID-19 [19]–[28].”
BackgroundDiscursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of “Superparticipants”
Graham, T., & Wright, S. (2013) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12016 · Cited by 196 · cited 2×
“The idea that there exists a continuum of behavior along the dimensions of social media engagement is also in line with two other theories, namely the notions of “super-participation” [61] and that of “dynamical classes of behavior” [62].”
ResultMeasuring Emotions in the COVID-19 Real World Worry Dataset
Kleinberg, B., van der Vegt, I., & Mozes, M. (2020) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04225 · Cited by 184
COVID-19: The First Public Coronavirus Twitter Dataset
Chen, E., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.07372 · Cited by 175 · cited 3×
“tweet text alongside with the URL. The large majority of the observed news bots tweets have been captured because the headlines contain one of the keywords used to seed the real-time data collection [19]. DISCUSSION COVID-19 is a global crisis and with people being pushed out of physical spaces due to containment meas…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSchild, L., Ling, C., Blackburn, J., et al. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04046 · Cited by 165
Dissecting a Social Botnet: Growth, Content and Influence in Twitter
Abokhodair, N., Yoo, D., & McDonald, D. W. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675208 · Cited by 162 · cited 1×
“h Projects Agency) aimed at detecting bots used for anti-science misinformation [4]. More recently, large bot networks (botnets) have been discovered on Twitter by various research groups [43], [44], [46], [48]. The literature on bot detection has become very extensive [31], [36], [49]–[51]. In [31], we proposed a sim…”
BackgroundMedia Manipulation and Disinformation Online
Marwick, A. (2017) · doi:10.69985/qpaf6919 · Cited by 160 · cited 2×
“Numerous studies have been devoted to understand, for example, how unscientific claims circulate online [71]–[74], or how conspiratorial narratives are constructed online [75]–[77], especially in the context of political ideology [2], [78].”
BackgroundUncovering Coordinated Networks on Social Media: Methods and Case Studies
Pacheco, D., Hui, P.-M., Torres-Lugo, C., Truong, B. T., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18075 · Cited by 140
E-Cigarette Surveillance With Social Media Data: Social Bots, Emerging Topics, and Trends
Allem, J.-P., Ferrara, E., Uppu, S. P., Cruz, T. B., & Unger, J. B. (2017) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/publichealth.8641 · Cited by 140 · cited 2×
“The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accounts [5], [6], [14]–[17].”
BackgroundSelf-citationDetecting Bots on Russian Political Twitter
Stukal, D., Sanovich, S., Bonneau, R., & Tucker, J. A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2017.0038 · Cited by 140 · cited 2×
“[59] D.”
BackgroundSocialbots: voices from the fronts
Hwang, T., Pearce, I., & Nanis, M. (2012) · INTR · doi:10.1145/2090150.2090161 · Cited by 131 · cited 1×
“[7] T.”
Prevalence of Low-Credibility Information on Twitter During the COVID-19 Outbreak
Yang, K.-C., Torres-Lugo, C., & Menczer, F. (2020) · ICWSM Workshops · doi:10.36190/2020.16 · Cited by 124
Red Bots Do It Better:Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Partisan Behavior
Luceri, L., Deb, A., Badawy, A., & Ferrara, E. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308560.3316735 · Cited by 113 · cited 1×
“[37] L.”
Self-citationDo Social Bots Dream of Electric Sheep? A Categorisation of Social Media Bot AccountsPreprint
Stieglitz, S., Brachten, F., Roß, B., & Jung, A.-K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.04044 · Cited by 108
Twitter turing test: Identifying social machines
Alarifi, A., Alsaleh, M., & Al‐Salman, A. S. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.036 · Cited by 106
Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?
Badawy, A., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2019) · Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3308560.3316494 · Cited by 105 · cited 1×
“[16] A.”
Self-citationClassification of Twitter Accounts into Automated Agents and Human Users
Gilani, Z., Kochmar, E., & Crowcroft, J. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3110091 · Cited by 102 · cited 1×
“[56] Z.”
QAnon and the Emergence of the Unreal
Zuckerman, E. (2019) · Journal of design and science · doi:10.21428/7808da6b.6b8a82b9 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“y an alleged "deep state" against U.S. President Donald Trump and his supporters”. QAnon has been extensively adopted by alt-right activists to foster participatory advocacy on social media [79], but it has also been abused by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) to push conspiratorial and divisive nar…”
BackgroundKeeping Up with the Tweet-dashians: The Impact of 'Official' Accounts on Online Rumoring
Andrews, C., Fichet, E., Ding, Y., Spiro, E. S., & Starbird, K. (2016) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2818048.2819986 · Cited by 98 · cited 1×
“well-established issue. Numerous studies have been devoted to understand, for example, how unscientific claims circulate online [71]–[74], or how conspiratorial narratives are constructed online [75]–[77], especially in the context of political ideology [2], [78]. Our analysis highlights the emergence of similar issue…”
BackgroundFerrara, E. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3299768 · Cited by 92 · cited 2×
“[34] E.”
BackgroundSelf-citation#COVID-19 on Twitter: Bots, Conspiracies, and Social Media Activism
Ferrara, E. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.09531 · Cited by 89 · cited 2×
“[88] E.”
BackgroundSelf-citationArif, A., Shanahan, K., Chou, F.-J., Dosouto, Y., Starbird, K., & Spiro, E. S. (2016) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2818048.2819964 · Cited by 82 · cited 1×
“[76] A.”
Unveiling Coordinated Groups Behind White Helmets Disinformation
Pacheco, D. F., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2020) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3366424.3385775 · Cited by 81 · cited 2×
“[84] D.”
Result"Manipulation and abuse on social media" by Emilio Ferrara with Ching-man Au Yeung as coordinator
Ferrara, E. (2015) · ACM SIGWEB Newsletter · doi:10.1145/2749279.2749283 · Cited by 73
Self-citationLuceri, L., Giordano, S., & Ferrara, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7311 · Cited by 72 · cited 2×
“The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accounts [5], [6], [14]–[17].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAlshaabi, T., Arnold, M., Minot, J. R., Adams, J. L., Dewhurst, D. R., Reagan, A. J., Muhamad, R., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244476 · Cited by 69 · cited 2×
“to determine whether the content is scientifically sound and accurate or not [22]. Other studies investigated collective attention and engagement dynamics concerning COVID-19 on Twitter. For example, [20] analyzed 1,000 unigrams (1-grams) posted on Twitter in 24 languages during early 2020, and compared them with the…”
ResultLOBO: Evaluation of Generalization Deficiencies in Twitter Bot Classifiers
Echeverra, J., De Cristofaro, E., Kourtellis, N., Leontiadis, I., Stringhini, G., & Zhou, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/3274694.3274738 · Cited by 61 · cited 2×
“(1) Deep learning [53], (2) Anomaly detection [54]–[57], (3) Time series analysis [38], [58], [59].”
BackgroundMinnich, A., Chavoshi, N., Koutra, D., & Mueen, A. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3110163 · Cited by 61 · cited 1×
“e annotated datasets of Twitter bots. Finally, various models have been proposed to detect bots using sophisticated machine learning techniques, such as: (1) Deep learning [53], (2) Anomaly detection [54]–[57], (3) Time series analysis [38], [58], [59]. Due to the continuously evolving nature of bots, and the challeng…”
MethodMeasuring Social Spam and the Effect of Bots on Information Diffusion in Social Media
Ferrara, E. (2018) · Computational social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_13 · Cited by 61
Self-citationPolitical hashtag hijacking in the U.S.
Hadgu, A. T., Garimella, K., & Weber, I. (2013) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2487788.2487809 · Cited by 60 · cited 1×
“s appears to dissipate toward the end of our observation window (early March). This type of bot behavior has been documented already in the past, and is commonly related to as “trend hijacking” [85], [86]: bots appear to ride the wave of popularity of a given topic, in this case the trending COVID-19 discussion, to in…”
BackgroundDiscovery, Retrieval, and Analysis of the 'Star Wars' Botnet in Twitter
Echeverría, J., & Zhou, S. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3110074 · Cited by 58 · cited 1×
“ects Agency) aimed at detecting bots used for anti-science misinformation [4]. More recently, large bot networks (botnets) have been discovered on Twitter by various research groups [43], [44], [46], [48]. The literature on bot detection has become very extensive [31], [36], [49]–[51]. In [31], we proposed a simple ta…”
BackgroundEvolution of bot and human behavior during elections
Luceri, L., Deb, A., Giordano, S., & Ferrara, E. (2019) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v24i9.10213 · Cited by 56 · cited 2×
“The presence of bots has been documented in the context of online political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accounts [5], [6], [14]–[17].”
BackgroundSelf-citationIs that social bot behaving unethically?
Salge, C. A. D. L., & Berente, N. (2017) · CACM · doi:10.1145/3126492 · Cited by 53 · cited 2×
“Numerous studies have been devoted to characterize the behavior of bots [36]– [38] and the ethical issues pertaining their use [39].”
BackgroundFrom Pizzagate to the Great Replacement: The Globalization of Conspiracy Theories
Cosentino, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43005-4_3 · Cited by 51 · cited 2×
“[80] G.”
BackgroundMeasuring Bot and Human Behavioral Dynamics
Pozzana, I., & Ferrara, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00125 · Cited by 49 · cited 3×
“Numerous studies have been devoted to characterize the behavior of bots [36]– [38] and the ethical issues pertaining their use [39].”
BackgroundSelf-citationMalevolent Creativity and Social Media: Creating Anti-immigration Communities on Twitter
Laurent, C. D. S., Glăveanu, V. P., & Chaudet, C. (2020) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2020.1712164 · Cited by 49 · cited 2×
“, GreatAwakening, Inf0wars, WWGWGA (Where We Go One We Go All), WeThePeople, and PatriotsFights [82].”
BackgroundSocial media signal detection using tweets volume, hashtag, and sentiment analysis
Nazir, F., Ghazanfar, M. A., Maqsood, M., Aadil, F., Rho, S., & Mehmood, I. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-6437-z · Cited by 48 · cited 2×
“[70] F.”
BackgroundShahsavari, S., Holur, P., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.13783 · Cited by 47
Health Communication Trolls and Bots Versus Public Health Agencies’ Trusted Voices
Sutton, J. N. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304661 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“nline political discussion [1]–[3], public health [4]–[8], civil unrest [9], stock market manipulation [10], the spread of false news [11]–[13], alongside with other tools such as troll accounts [5], [6], [14]–[17]. In this paper, we chart the landscape of Twitter chatter within the context of COVID-19 related convers…”
BackgroundAn in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter
Gilani, Z., Farahbakhsh, R., Tyson, G., et al. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01508 · Cited by 29
Zelenkauskaitė, A., & Balduccini, M. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117718468 · Cited by 27 · cited 2×
“Similar approaches have been developed in the domain of information warfare detection: one such example, is the CUT (Commenting User Typology) Framework, which was proposed to classify comment abuse, where users are divided into quadrants of behaviors alongside various dimensions of interest [60].”
BackgroundDetecting and Characterizing Bot-Like Behavior on Twitter
Qi, S., Alkulaib, L., & Broniatowski, D. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93372-6_26 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“algorithmic manipulation, to trick recommendation and ranking systems used by social media platforms, and give higher visibility to certain actors, viewpoints, or campaigns. According to work by [5], [42], similar conclusions can be drawn for bots active in public health discussions, with the intent to spread claims c…”
BackgroundPolarize and Conquer: Russian Influence Operations in the United States
Cosentino, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43005-4_2 · Cited by 15 · cited 1×
“t-right activists to foster participatory advocacy on social media [79], but it has also been abused by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) to push conspiratorial and divisive narratives [80], [81]. QAnon appears alongside with other known alt-right terms, e.g., GreatAwakening, Inf0wars, WWGWGA (Where We Go One…”
BackgroundOn Twitter Bots Behaving Badly
Daniel, F., & Millimaggi, A. (2020) · Journal of Web Engineering · doi:10.13052/jwe1540-9589.1883 · Cited by 4 · cited 2×
“nt, or clonedcontent from other users; finally, (7) pausing activity to mimic human circadian cycles and bursty behaviors, as well as to satisfy API constraints, and to avoid suspension. According to [35], these features can enable bots to carry out various forms of abuse including: denigrate and smear, deceive and ma…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [47]C. Freitas, F. Benevenuto, S. Ghosh, and A. Veloso, 'Reverse engineering socialbot infiltration strategies in twitter,' in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2015 , Aug. 2015, pp. 25-32, doi: 10.1145/2808797.2809292. · DOI
- [51]S. Cresci, A. Spognardi, M. Petrocchi, M. Tesconi, and R. Di Pietro, 'The paradigm-shift of social spambots: Evidence, theories, and tools for the arms race,' in 26th International World Wide Web Conference 2017, WWW 2017 Companion , 2019, pp. 963-972, doi: 10.1145/3041021.3055135. · DOI · Paper page
- [63]K.-C. Yang, O. Varol, P.-M. Hui, and F. Menczer, 'Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selection,' Nov. 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09179. · arXiv
- [83]D. Pacheco, P.-M. Hui, C. Torres-Lugo, B. T. Truong, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer, 'Uncovering Coordinated Networks on Social Media,' Jan. 2020, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.05658. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The COVID-19 social media infodemic
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5 · Cited by 2,313
Future directions for chatbot research: An interdisciplinary research agenda
Følstad, A., Araujo, T., Law, E. L.-C., Brandtzaeg, P. B., Papadopoulos, S., Reis, L., Baez, M., Laban, G., McAllister, P., Ischen, C., et al. (2021) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-021-01016-7 · Cited by 247
Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19
Himelein-Wachowiak, M., Giorgi, S., Devoto, A., Rahman, M. M., Ungar, L., Schwartz, H. A., Epstein, D. H., Leggio, L., & Curtis, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26933 · Cited by 238
“In an analysis of 43 million COVID-19–related tweets, bots were found to be pushing a number of conspiracy theories, such as QAnon, in addition to retweeting links from partisan news sites [73].”
Botometer 101: social bot practicum for computational social scientists
Yang, K.-C., Ferrara, E., & Menczer, F. (2022) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-022-00177-5 · Cited by 159
“Bots also actively participate in public health debates [12] including those about vaccines [13, 14], the COVID-19 pandemic [15, 16, 17, 18], and cannabis [19].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSocial Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study
Jiang, J., Ren, X., & Ferrara, E. (2021) · JMIRx Med · doi:10.2196/29570 · Cited by 162
“Therefore, similar to previous work [23,26,28], we binned users by evenly distributed deciles of the polarity scores, with each decile containing exactly 10% of all users.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrara, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferrara, Emilio
- ORCID
- Ferrara, Emilio
- Venue
- First Monday
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 2020-05-19
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- 1396-0466
- OpenAlex
- W3032981809
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 34
- FWCI
- 58.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- First Monday (publishedVersion)
- First Monday (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter bots, political conspiracy, misinformation, automated accounts, social media, public health discourse, online political discussion, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review