The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where are we in the search for an artificial visual cortex for embodied intelligence
Open accessAbstract
We present the largest and most comprehensive empirical study of pre-trained visual representations (PVRs) or visual 'foundation models' for Embodied AI. First, we curate CortexBench, consisting of 17 different tasks spanning locomotion, navigation, dexterous, and mobile manipulation. Next, we systematically evaluate existing PVRs and find that none are universally dominant. To study the effect of pre-training data size and diversity, we combine over 4,000 hours of egocentric videos from 7 different sources (over 4.3M images) and ImageNet to train different-sized vision transformers using Masked Auto-Encoding (MAE) on slices of this data. Contrary to inferences from prior work, we find that scaling dataset size and diversity does not improve performance universally (but does so on average). Our largest model, named VC-1, outperforms all prior PVRs on average but does not universally dominate either. Next, we show that task- or domain-specific adaptation of VC-1 leads to substantial gains, with VC-1 (adapted) achieving competitive or superior performance than the best known results on all of the benchmarks in CortexBench. Finally, we present real-world hardware experiments, in which VC-1 and VC-1 (adapted) outperform the strongest pre-existing PVR. Overall, this paper presents no new techniques but a rigorous systematic evaluation, a broad set of findings about PVRs (that in some cases, refute those made in narrow domains in prior work), and open-sourced code and models (that required over 10,000 GPU-hours to train) for the benefit of the research community.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pretrained visual representations do not generalize to the domain-specific robot navigation task, leading to a decrease in performance.
“The pretrained visual representations do not generalize to domainspecific robot navigation task, leading to the decrease in performance [43].”
From NavFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Robot Target-Driven Navigation in Unknown and Dynamic Environments (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cites
Fukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models : Open X-Embodiment Collaboration 0
O’Neill, A., Rehman, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., Mandlekar, A., Jain, A., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611477 · Cited by 210
Self-citationOcto: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy
Ghosh, D., Walke, H., Pertsch, K., Black, K., Mees, O., Dasari, S., Hejna, J., Kreiman, T., Xu, C., Luo, J., et al. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.090 · Cited by 129
Wang, H., Tan, A. H., & Nejat, G. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3412638 · Cited by 40
AirExo: Low-Cost Exoskeletons for Learning Whole-Arm Manipulation in the Wild
Fang, H., Fang, H.-S., Wang, Y., Ren, J., Chen, J., Zhang, R., Wang, W., & Lu, C. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610799 · Cited by 38
Generating Meaning: Active Inference and the Scope and Limits of Passive AI
Pezzulo, G., Parr, T., Cisek, P., Clark, A., & Friston, K. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8xgzv · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Majumdar, A., Yadav, K., Arnaud, S., Ma, J., Chen, C., Silwal, S., Jain, A., Berges, V.-P., Wu, T., Vakil, J., Abbeel, P., Malik, J., Batra, D., Lin, Y., Maksymets, O., Rajeswaran, A., & Meier, F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 655-677
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7133188016
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 25.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- embodied AI, visual cortex, artificial intelligence, visual perception, neuromorphic computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review