Cited by 34Student Stress and CopingEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The Effectiveness of Social-Emotional Learning Strategies and Mindful Breathing with Biofeedback on the Reduction of Adolescent Test Anxiety

Open access
McLeod, Carolyn, Boyes, Mike·2021·Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation

Abstract

Educational programs that incorporate social emotional-learning (SEL) strategies, study skills, and mindful breathing using biofeedback can help adolescents decrease worry and social stress, increase test preparedness self-efficacy, and improve academic performance due to lowered levels of test anxiety. The current study examined the efficacy of a SEL intervention (implemented into a high school psychology course) focused on study skills and mindful breathing and its impact on student attitude and behavioural changes (e.g., test anxiety, self-efficacy), academic performance, and physical changes. A quasi-experimental explanatory mixed methods study conducted at a rural Alberta high school examined pre- and post-intervention results between two groups of Grades 9–12 students (N = 105) with one group receiving the intervention (mindful breathing sessions, emotional regulation techniques, study and test-taking skills, and coping strategies) while the other received regular programming. Quantitative data included a Test Anxiety Survey (TAS), Student Opinion Survey–Short Form (SOS-SF), and reading comprehension (RC) tests to measure attitude and behavioural changes, followed by qualitative data obtained from student semi-structured interviews and focus groups for further interpretation. Quantitative results from repeated-measures (RM) ANOVAs indicated significant increases in self-efficacy for preparation and test-taking, increased academic achievement, decreased worry about future social stress, and increased positive affect. Effect sizes for significant impacts ranged from .45 to .65. Qualitative data indicated that students acquired new SEL strategies to help them handle stressful test situations more effectively. The current study addresses topics of interest to educators (e.g., test anxiety, social emotional learning) with a discussion of applications for extension and development of the program in junior and senior high classrooms. Keywords: test anxiety, adolescents, social-emotional learning, mindfulness, biofeedback

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53967/cje-rce.v44i3.4869

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). Academic Press.
  2. Driedger, M. (2019, February 21-22). Understanding and alleviating assessment anxiety [Conference presentation]. Palliser Teacher's Convention, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  3. Meyer, D. (2016). Emotional regulation in K-12 classrooms. Taylor & Francis. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 44:3 (2021) www.cje-rce.ca SEL Intervention Effectiveness on Test Anxiety Reduction 846
  4. Sasikala, S., & Karunanidhi, S. (2010). Test anxiety in relation to behavioural problems of school students. Journal of Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 5(1), 109-120. http://globalvisionpub.com/globaljournalmanager/pdf/1376976617.pdf
  5. Spielberger, C. D. (1980). Test anxiety inventory: Preliminary professional manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  6. Spielberger, C. D., & Vagg, P. R. (1987). The treatment of test anxiety: A transactional process model. In R. Schwarzer, H. M. Vander Ploeg, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 5, pp. 179-186). Swets & Zeitlinger.
  7. Test Prep Review. (2020). Reading comprehension practice test 1. https://www. testprepreview.com/modules/reading1.htm

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLeod, C., & Boyes, M.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
815-847
ISSN
  • 0380-2361 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-5979
OpenAlex
W3201745872
Cited by
34
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
test anxiety, social-emotional learning, mindful breathing, biofeedback, mindfulness, adolescents, self-efficacy, academic performance, study skills, emotion regulation, coping strategies, high school students, rural schools, reading comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review