Cited by 461Identity, Memory, and TherapyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health via Writing

Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing

Kross, Ethan, Ayduk, Ozlem·2011·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Both common wisdom and findings from multiple areas of research suggest that it is helpful to understand and make meaning out of negative experiences. However, people’s attempts to do so often backfire, leading them to ruminate and feel worse. Here we attempt to shed light on these seemingly contradictory sets of findings by examining the role that self-distancing plays in facilitating adaptive self-reflection. We begin by briefly describing the “self-reflection paradox.” We then define self-distancing, present evidence from multiple levels of analysis that illustrate how this process facilitates adaptive self-reflection, and discuss the basic science and practical implications of this research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721411408883

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A narrow and self-immersed perspective and focus on recounting details and personal reactions might undermine adaptive self-reflection and the resolution of initial post-traumatic stress reactions.

    “Whilst working through the trauma memory is beneficial for constructing an elaborated and organized perspective of the event, a narrow and self-immersed perspective and focus on recounting details and personal reactions might undermine adaptive self-reflection (29) as well as the resolution of initial post-traumatic stress reactions.”
  • Analyzing the meaning of memories and experiences from a self-distanced perspective can reap mental health benefits.

    “Kross, Ayduk and colleagues have shown in a novel series of studies that analyzing the meaning of memories and experiences (e.g. thinking about why they may have occurred) from a self-distanced perspective can reap mental health benefits (see Kross & Ayduk, 2011; for a summary).”
  • Self-distancing from distressing information can be beneficial if participants are provided with functional ways to process the information from a self-distanced stance, in this case using appraisals to broaden perspective.

    “This confirms the findings from earlier work (Kross & Ayduk, 2011) that self-distancing from distressing information can be beneficial (cf. Kuyken & Moulds, 2009) if participants are provided with functional ways to process the information from a self-distanced stance, in this case using appraisals to broaden perspective.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kross, E., & Ayduk, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2011-05-24
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
187-191
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2156427607
Cited by
460
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
30.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
self-distancing, negative experiences, meaning-making, self-reflection, rumination, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review