The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Abstract
The authors conducted a qualitative study of the motivations and contextual factors that induce corporate ecological responsiveness. Analytic induction applied to data collected from 53 firms in the United Kingdom and Japan revealed three motivations: competitiveness, legitimation, and ecological responsibility. These motivations were influenced by three contextual conditions: field cohesion, issue salience, and individual concern. In this article, the authors also identify the conditions that likely lead to high corporate ecological responsiveness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“organizations whose operations pose a greater risk to the environment are more likely to be heavily regulated and scrutinized by the state (Bansal and Roth, 2000;Reid and Toffel, 2009;Chatterji and Toffel, 2010) and will thus establish sophisticated reporting structures and processes aimed at increasing the transparency of their operations and impacts (Lyon and Maxwell, 2011).”
From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Bansal and Roth, 2000
In the citing paper
“Organisational leadership is a crucial facilitator for GPP engagement, particularly regarding environmental, human rights, philanthropic and safety issues (Bansal & Roth, 2000), including management support (Vluggen et al., 2020).”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Bansal & Roth, 2000
In the citing paper
“Organisational leadership in environmental, human rights, philanthropic, and safety issues Bansal and Roth (2000)”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Bansal and Roth (2000)
Citations
Cites
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,973
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033 · Cited by 9,335
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311436079 · Cited by 4,032
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275678 · Cited by 3,602
Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001 · Cited by 3,021
Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development
Bansal, P. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.441 · Cited by 3,106
Self-citationGreen Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, P., & Roth, K.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- ORCID
- Bansal, P.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 717-736
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1969274127
- Cited by
- 4,020
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 248 · 2025: 288 · 2024: 237 · 2023: 230 · 2022: 244 · 2021: 233 · 2020: 228 · 2019: 211 · 2018: 206 · 2017: 210 · 2016: 173 · 2015: 197 · 2014: 218 · 2013: 184 · 2012: 225
- FWCI
- 48.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Keywords
- corporate environmental management, competitiveness, legitimation, environmental responsibility, issue salience, contextual factors, UK firms, Japanese companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review