Cited by 432Business Strategies and Management ResearchBusiness and Management StudiesAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What makes management research interesting and why does it matter?

Bartunek, Jean M., Rynes, Sara L., Ireland, R. Duane·2006·Academy of Management Journal

DOI 10.5465/amj.2006.20785494

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article discusses management research and what makes it interesting. In a well-known paper, “That’s Interesting!” Murray Davis argued that what most makes scholarly work interesting is that it disconfirms some (but not all) of the assumptions held by its audience. Davis’ arguments about what constitutes interesting research are summarized, including something that engages readers’ attention, something that stands out for readers “in contrast to the web of routinely taken-for-granted propositions which make up the structure of their everyday life.” Some perspectives from a Brazilian scholarly journal, “Revisita de Administracao de Empresas,” are also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2006.20785494

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Annual Review of Sociology
(2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/soc.718 · Cited by 2,674
That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology
Davis, M. S. (1971) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839317100100211 · Cited by 1,219
The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks
Barley, S. R. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393551 · Cited by 941
FACTIONAL GROUPS: A NEW VANTAGE ON DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINES, CONFLICT, AND DISINTEGRATION IN WORK TEAMS
Li, J.-T., & Hambrick, D. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803923 · Cited by 799
Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship.
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545 · Cited by 790
What Is Interesting? Exploring the Appraisal Structure of Interest.
Silvia, P. J. (2005) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89 · Cited by 767
TOURNAMENT RITUALS IN THE EVOLUTION OF FIELDS: THE CASE OF THE GRAMMY AWARDS.
Anand, N., & Watson, M. R. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159560 · Cited by 391
Interest as the Missing Motivator in Self-Regulation
Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175 · Cited by 362
WHEN THE KNOWN DEVIL IS BETTER THAN AN UNKNOWN GOD: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF RELAY CEO SUCCESSIONS.
Rajagopalan, N. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159598 · Cited by 343
On Rigor and Relevance: Fostering Dialectic Progress in Management Research
Vermeulen, F. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.19573102 · Cited by 243

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 17 references

Sorted by citations

Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859
BUILDING THEORY ABOUT THEORY BUILDING: WHAT CONSTITUTES A THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION?
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0486 · Cited by 1,813
From the Editors: For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing Up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research
Pratt, M. G. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.44632557 · Cited by 1,625
GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION.
Alvesson, M. G., & Sandberg, J. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.59330882 · Cited by 1,738
Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here?
Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306293668 · Cited by 1,508
Renaissance of case research as a scientific method
Ketokivi, M. A., & Choi, T. Y. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.004 · Cited by 1,474
Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities
Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.69 · Cited by 1,334
Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building
Gehman, J., Glaser, V., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2017) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492617706029 · Cited by 1,465
Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. B. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.4004 · Cited by 1,264
Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2020) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7 · Cited by 916
Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal
Colquitt, J. A., & Muir, C. P. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28165855 · Cited by 1,065
Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0312896219871976 · Cited by 997
When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings
Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012181 · Cited by 853
Discourse and Deinstitutionalization: the Decline of DDT
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461993 · Cited by 839
GRASPING THE LOGIC OF PRACTICE: THEORIZING THROUGH PRACTICAL RATIONALITY.
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.59330942 · Cited by 850
Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization?
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. G. (2010) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508410372151 · Cited by 787
The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends
Li, F. (2018) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004 · Cited by 807
The ‘‘what’’and ‘‘how’’of case study rigor: three strategies based on published work
Gibbert, M., & Ruigrok, W. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109351319 · Cited by 506
The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship
Massis, A. D., & Kotlar, J. (2014) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007 · Cited by 961
“Systematic combining”—A decade later
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.036 · Cited by 725
Sustainable supply chain management: framework and further research directions
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Παπαδόπουλος, Θ., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. T., & Wamba, S. F. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.117 · Cited by 671
Qualitative Research in Management: A Decade of Progress
Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W. S., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00972.x · Cited by 606
Academics and Practitioners Are Alike and Unlike
Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314529160 · Cited by 522
Self-citation
A Matter of Life or Death: How Extreme Context Research Matters for Management and Organization Studies
Hällgren, M., Rouleau, L., & de Rond, M. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0017 · Cited by 563
Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research
Alvesson, M. G., & Sandberg, J. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x · Cited by 537
Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study
Gustafsson, J. (2017) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 482
Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research
Pratt, M. G., Kaplan, S., & Whittington, R. (2020) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839219887663 · Cited by 458
Process thinking in strategic organization
Langley, A. (2007) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127007079965 · Cited by 472
An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure: Improving Research Quality Before Data Collection
Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091231 · Cited by 304
Phenomenon-based Research in Management and Organisation Science: When is it Rigorous and Does it Matter?
von Krogh, G., Rossi‐Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, S. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001 · Cited by 335
Theorizing Through Literature Reviews: The Miner-Prospector Continuum
Breslin, D., & Gatrell, C. J. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120943288 · Cited by 317
Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., & Stahre, J. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.010 · Cited by 272
Moving Forward by Looking Back: Reclaiming Unconventional Research Contexts and Samples in Organizational Scholarship
Bamberger, P. A., & Pratt, M. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.52814357 · Cited by 261
Of methods and methodology
Bryman, A. E. (2008) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640810900568 · Cited by 258
A Trail Guide to Publishing Success: Tips on Writing Influential Conceptual, Qualitative, and Survey Research
Fawcett, S. E., Waller, M. A., Miller, J. W., Schwieterman, M. A., Hazen, B. T., & Overstreet, R. E. (2014) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.12039 · Cited by 262
From complexity to transparency: managing the interplay between theory, method and empirical phenomena in IMM case studies
Dubois, A., & Gibbert, M. (2009) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.003 · Cited by 270
Beyond Formulaic Research: In Praise of Greater Diversity in Organizational Research and Publications
Alvesson, M. G., & Gabriel, Y. (2013) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0327 · Cited by 262
The Construction and Contributions of "Implications for Practice": What's in Them and What Might They Offer?
Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2010.48661194 · Cited by 241
Self-citation
Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-in versus Box-Breaking Research
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614530916 · Cited by 204
“An A Is An A”: The New Bottom Line For Valuing Academic Research
Aguinis, H., Cummings, C., Ramani, R. S., & Cummings, T. G. (2019) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0193 · Cited by 242
(Un)Conditional surrender? Why do professionals willingly comply with managerialism
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-11-2015-0221 · Cited by 168
Scenarios as a scholarly methodology to produce “interesting research”
Ramírez, R., Mukherjee, M., Vezzoli, S., & Kramer, A. M. (2015) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.006 · Cited by 243
Asian Management Research: Status Today and Future Outlook
Bruton, G. D., & Lau, C. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00758.x · Cited by 209
International Activities of Emerging Market Firms
Jormanainen, I., & Koveshnikov, A. (2012) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-011-0115-y · Cited by 212
Field Research Practice in Management and Organization Studies: Reclaiming its Tradition of Discovery
Locke, K. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.593319 · Cited by 196
Mergers and acquisitions—Time for a methodological rejuvenation of the field?
Meglio, O., & Risberg, A. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2009.11.002 · Cited by 177
Maturation of Corporate Governance Research, 1993–2007: An Assessment
Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00739.x · Cited by 171
Relationally Reflexive Practice
Hibbert, P., Sillince, J. A. A., Diefenbach, T., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114524829 · Cited by 164
The Theory Crisis in Management Research: Solving the Right Problem
Cronin, M. A., Stouten, J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0294 · Cited by 164
Uncovering the Intellectual Structure of Research in Business Ethics: A Journey Through the History, the Classics, and the Pillars of Journal of Business Ethics
Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0924-8 · Cited by 166
Building Bridges: Toward Alternative Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Matthews, L., Power, D., Touboulic, A., & Marques, L. (2015) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12097 · Cited by 163
Explaining incubators using firm analogy
Aaboen, L. (2009) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.007 · Cited by 151
Supply chain flexibility: an inter‐firm empirical study
Stevenson, M., & Spring, M. (2009) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570910986238 · Cited by 148
Editor's Afterword
Rynes, S. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27156169 · Cited by 143
Self-citation
Synergetic effect of lean and green on innovation: A resource-based perspective
Kumar, M., & Rodrigues, V. S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.007 · Cited by 135
The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed
Schiele, H., Krummaker, S., Hoffmann, P., & Kowalski, R. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.075 · Cited by 134
Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus
Miller, C. C. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.21794661 · Cited by 134
Entering a Dialogue: Positioning Case Study Findings towards Theory
Ridder, H., Hoon, C., & Baluch, A. M. (2012) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12000 · Cited by 160
Research Handbook of Expatriates
Hutchings, K., & Michailova, S. (2017) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781784718183 · Cited by 131
Family firms: A research agenda and publication guide
Wright, M., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2011) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.10.002 · Cited by 127
The Practice of Innovating Research Methods
Lê, J. K., & Schmid, T. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120935498 · Cited by 180
Innovative born Globals: Investigating the influence of their business models on international performance
KRAUS, S., BREM, A., SCHUESSLER, M., SCHUESSLER, F., & NIEMAND, T. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919617500050 · Cited by 114
Ghost in the Machine: On Organizational Theory in the Age of Machine Learning
Leavitt, K., Schabram, K., Hariharan, P., & Barnes, C. M. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0247 · Cited by 120
Pre-understanding: An interpretation-enhancer and horizon-expander in research
Alvesson, M. G., & Sandberg, J. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840621994507 · Cited by 115
Re‐imagining supply chain challenges through critical engaged research
Touboulic, A., McCarthy, L., & Matthews, L. (2020) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12226 · Cited by 109
The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984-2004
Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00726.x · Cited by 108
Conducting field experiments using eLancing's natural environment
Aguinis, H., & Lawal, S. O. (2012) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.01.002 · Cited by 106
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals
Stremersch, S., Camacho, N., Vanneste, S., & Verniers, I. (2015) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004 · Cited by 102
Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect—Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities
Tang, T. L., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicia, F., Garber, I. E., Chiu, R. K., Charles‐Pauvers, B., Arocas, R. L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2942-4 · Cited by 113
Crafting Papers for Publication: Novelty and Convention in Academic Writing
Patriotta, G. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12280 · Cited by 97
What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work: A contribution on contributions
Nicholson, J. D., LaPlaca, P. J., Al‐Abdin, A., Breese, R., & Khan, Z. (2018) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.014 · Cited by 97
Breaking the Silence About Exiting Fieldwork: A Relational Approach and Its Implications For Theorizing
Michailova, S., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., Ritvala, T. A.-M., Mihailova, I., & Salmi, A. (2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0403 · Cited by 97
The Bright and Dark Sides of Religiosity Among University Students: Do Gender, College Major, and Income Matter?
Chen, Y., & Tang, T. L. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1407-2 · Cited by 92
What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap
Frank, H., & Landström, H. (2015) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2015.1100687 · Cited by 90
Is the employee–organization relationship dying or thriving? A temporal meta-analysis.
Eisenberger, R., Rockstuhl, T., Shoss, M. K., Wen, X., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000390 · Cited by 98
Decision-makers’ underestimation of user innovation
Bradonjic, P., Franke, N., & Lüthje, C. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020 · Cited by 86
Making academic research more relevant: A few suggestions
Panda, A., & Gupta, R. K. (2014) · IIMB Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.iimb.2014.07.008 · Cited by 76
Une analyse historique du concept de parties prenantes : Quelles leçons pour l'avenir ?
Mercier, S. (2010) · Management & Avenir · doi:10.3917/mav.033.0142 · Cited by 76
Editors’ Comments: “What I Know Now That I Wish I Knew Then”—Teaching Theory and Theory Building
Byron, K., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0094 · Cited by 76
The theoretical contribution of case study research to the field of strategy and management
Ridder, H., Hoon, C., & Baluch, A. M. (2009) · Research methodology in strategy and management · doi:10.1108/s1479-8387(2009)0000005007 · Cited by 75
The Role of Dialectical Interrogation in Review Studies: Theorizing from What We See Rather Than What We Have Already Seen
Hoon, C., & Baluch, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12543 · Cited by 85
Decolonising research approaches towards non-extractive research
Igwe, P. A., Madichie, N. O., & Rugara, D. G. (2022) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-11-2021-0135 · Cited by 74
Sensemaking processes and Weickarious learning
Colville, I. D., Pye, A., & Brown, A. D. (2015) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507615616542 · Cited by 81
Qualitative Research in Entrepreneurship Studies: A State-of-Science
Javadian, G., Dobratz, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, V. K., & Martin, J. A. (2020) · The Journal of Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/0971355720930564 · Cited by 72
Qualitative Research in I-O Psychology: Maps, Myths, and Moving Forward
Pratt, M. G., & Bonaccio, S. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2016.92 · Cited by 78
The Development of the Resource-based View: Reflections from Birger Wernerfelt 1
Lockett, A., O’Shea, R. P., & Wright, M. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840608094773 · Cited by 71
Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics Across 32 Cultures: Good Apples Enjoy Good Quality of Life in Good Barrels
Tang, T. L., Sutarso, T., Ansari, M. A., Lim, V. K. G., Teo, T. S. H., Arias-Galicia, F., Garber, I. E., Chiu, R. K., Charles‐Pauvers, B., Arocas, R. L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2980-y · Cited by 73
“That’s Interesting!” in Family Business Research
Salvato, C., & Aldrich, H. E. (2012) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486512446327 · Cited by 71
Qualitative Methods in Business Ethics, Corporate Responsibility, and Sustainability Research
Reinecke, J., Arnold, D., & Palazzo, G. (2016) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.67 · Cited by 70
Methods in M&A—A look at the past and the future to forge a path forward
Cartwright, S., Teerikangas, S. P., Rouziès, A., & Wilson‐Evered, E. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.03.002 · Cited by 73
Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science
Byington, E. K., & Felps, W. (2016) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2015.0035 · Cited by 73
The Research-Practice Gap in I/O Psychology and Related Fields: Challenges and Potential Solutions
Rynes-Weller, S. L. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0013 · Cited by 90
Daring to Care
Adler, N. J., & Hansen, H. (2012) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492611427801 · Cited by 65
Qualitative methods for engineering systems: Why we need them and how to use them
Szajnfarber, Z., & Gralla, E. L. (2017) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21412 · Cited by 76
Putting qualitative international business research in context(s)
Reuber, A. R., & Fischer, E. M. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00478-3 · Cited by 79
Factors affecting the study of important marketing issues: Implications and recommendations
Kohli, A. K., & Haenlein, M. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.02.009 · Cited by 65
The problem with [in] management theory
Mathieu, J. E. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2114 · Cited by 63
The Conduct of Qualitative Research in Organizational Settings
Pettigrew, A. (2012) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00925.x · Cited by 91
A Study of the Performativity of the “Ambidextrous Organizations” Theory: Neither Lost in nor Lost before Translation
Durisin, B., & Todorova, G. (2012) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00981.x · Cited by 59

Authors: Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., & Ireland, R. D.
Affiliations: Boston College (US)
University of Iowa (US)
Texas A&M University (US)
ORCID: Bartunek, Jean M.
Venue: Academy of Management Journal
Publisher: Academy of Management
Published: 2006-02
Volume: 49
Issue: 1
Pages: 9-15
ISSN: 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
1948-0989
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.20785494
OpenAlex: W1970959237
Cited by: 432
References: 17
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
FWCI: 26.11
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Business and Management Studies
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords: management research, research interest, reader attention, academic writing, Brazilian management journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

What makes management research interesting and why does it matter?

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks