The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration
Abstract
The article examines how management science researchers and academics might more fruitfully collaborate with actual managers. The two groups are separated by, among many other things, the language and intellectual structure with which they attack management problems. The linear, structured “academic” methodology and language employed by management scientists is often baffling to managers trained to think more holistically about the issues confronting them. The articles previously published in the history of this publication are analyzed for the amount of information provided directly relating to management practice. The creation of relationships between management science academics and managers beyond collaborative research projects are shown to be desirable, and the difficulties of creating them acknowledged. Such relationships may well thrive in settings less formal than collaborative research projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,752
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
Ireland, R. D., Elfring, T., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2011) · In Search of Research Excellence · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00017 · Cited by 4,553
The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001 · Cited by 3,861
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786060 · Cited by 1,973
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
Van de Ven, A. H. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199226290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,851
Knowledge for Theory and Practice
Van De Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527385 · Cited by 1,663
Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785503 · Cited by 1,452
Aken, J. E. V. (2004) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x · Cited by 1,303
Cited by
Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314529160 · Cited by 522
Self-citationFrom Homogenization to Pluralism: International Management Research in the Academy and Beyond
Tsui, A. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28166121 · Cited by 486
Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm
Carroll, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D. (2008) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715008095186 · Cited by 466
Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y · Cited by 377
Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1062 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartunek, J. M.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1323-1333
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2012729061
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 51.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2007.28165912
- The paper
- Bartunek, J. M. (2007). Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28165912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
