The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters
Open accessAbstract
This study investigates how foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Using detailed questionnaire and archival data on 283 subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, our analysis revealed three significant findings. First, attention decisions are partially based on the structural positions that subsidiary units occupy within a corporate system–their “weight.” Second, a subsidiary also has a “voice” of its own that it can use to attract attention. Third, the relationship between a subsidiary's voice and headquarters attention is moderated by two specific aspects of the subsidiary's historical situation: geographic distance and downstream competence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391211 · Cited by 3,937
Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259200 · Cited by 2,776
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255638 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citation
Cited by
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective
Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0191-0 · Cited by 371
Subsidiary capability upgrading under emerging market acquirers
He, S., Khan, Z., & Shenkar, O. (2018) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.006 · Cited by 81
Lee, J. M., Narula, R., & Hillemann, J. (2021) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101193 · Cited by 71
Mäntymäki, M., Hyrynsalmi, S., & Koskenvoima, A. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09913-1 · Cited by 45
Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. (2016) · Multinational Business Review · doi:10.1108/mbr-05-2015-0021 · Cited by 19
The Multinational Corporation as a Playing Field of Power: A Bourdieusian Approach
Delmestri, G., & Brumana, M. (2017) · Multinational Corporations and Organization Theory: Post Millennium Perspectives · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20160000049011 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 577-601
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2127431601
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 87.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
