The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining Bias against Black Leaders: Integrating Theory on Information Processing and Goal-Based Stereotyping
Abstract
Approaches related to inference-based processing (e.g., romance-of-leadership theory) would suggest that black leaders are evaluated positively after success. In contrast, approaches related to recognition-based processing (e.g., leader categorization theory) would suggest that, because of stereotyping, black leaders are evaluated negatively regardless of their performance. To reconcile this discrepancy, we predicted that evaluators would engage in goal-based stereotyping by perceiving that black leaders—and not white leaders—fail because of negative leader-based attributes and succeed because of positive nonleader attributes (i.e., compensatory stereotypes). Multilevel analyses of archival data in the context of college football in the United States supported our predictions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, unlike the research examining gender and leadership, research into minority leaders is scant although it is increasing (Carton & Rosette, 2011).”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Carton & Rosette, 2011
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Filders, R. (1992) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(92)90130-2 · Cited by 16,765
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 11,176
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Everitt, B. S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530193 · Cited by 9,034
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,277
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Administrative Science Quarterly
Miewald, R. D. (1981) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/027507408101500109 · Cited by 3,806
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed
GROVE, W. A. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.12.1644-a · Cited by 3,756
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Alliance Board for Diversity, 2005, Women and minorities on Fortune 100 boards
- Corporate Board Initiative, 2006, 2005 update on the Committee of 100's Asian & Asian Pacific American (APA) corporate board report card
- Eisenhardt K. M, 1989, Academy of Management Review, 14, 532, 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 · DOI · Paper page
- Hofmann D. A., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 467
- Kunda Z., 2003, Motivated social perception: The Ontario Symposium, 9, 1
- Smith C. P, 2000, Handbook of research methods in social and personality, 313
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership
Hoyt, C. L., & Murphy, S. E. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.002 · Cited by 454
Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO?
Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2161 · Cited by 441
Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties
Rosette, A. S., Koval, C. Z., Ma, A., & Livingston, R. W. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.008 · Cited by 444
Self-citationRosette, A. S., & Livingston, R. W. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002 · Cited by 236
Self-citationLeadership Over-Emergence in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Gender and Countervailing Biases
Lanaj, K., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0303 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Carton, A. M., & Rosette, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1141-1158
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2047151391
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 16.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Keywords
- information processing, leader evaluation, college football coaches, racial stereotypes, performance evaluation (human resources)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
