Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self- and Peer Evaluation

Open access
Ohland, Matthew W., Loughry, Misty L., Woehr, David J., Bullard, Lisa G., Felder, Richard M., Finelli, Cynthia J., Layton, Richard A., Pomeranz, Hal R., Schmucker, Douglas G.·2012·Academy of Management Learning & Education
DOI 10.5465/amle.2010.0177
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Instructors often incorporate self- and peer evaluations when they use teamwork in their classes, which is common in management education. However, the process is often time consuming and frequently does not match well with guidance provided by the literature. We describe the development of a web-based instrument that efficiently collects and analyzes self- and peer-evaluation data. The instrument uses a behaviorally anchored rating scale to measure team-member contributions in five areas based on the team effectiveness literature. Three studies provide evidence for the validity of the new instrument. Implications for management education and areas for future research are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amle.2010.0177

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. ABET, 2000, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
  2. Aggarwal P., 2008, Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 255, 10.1177/0273475308322283 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alsop R, 2002, The Wall Street Journal, 2002, R11
  4. Bacon D. R., 1999, Journal of Management Education, 23, 467, 10.1177/105256299902300503 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baker D. F, 2008, Journal of Management Education, 33, 183, 10.1177/1052562907310489 · doi:10.1177/1052562907310489
  6. Bamberger P. A., 2005, Group and Organization Management, 30, 344, 10.1177/1059601104267619 · DOI
  7. Barrick M. R., 1998, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377 · Paper page
  8. Bell M. P, 2010, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, 5
  9. Bettenhausen K. L., 1997, Group and Organization Management, 22, 236, 10.1177/1059601197222006 · DOI
  10. Boni A. A., 2009, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 407
  11. Brennan R. L, 1994, Cognitive assessment: A multidisciplinary perspective, 175, 10.1007/978-1-4757-9730-5_9 · DOI
  12. Brennan R. L, 2000, Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 339, 10.1177/01466210022031796 · DOI
  13. Brooks C. M., 2003, Journal of Education for Business, 78, 268, 10.1080/08832320309598613 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Brutus S., 2010, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, 652
  15. Brutus S., Academy of Management Learning and Education
  16. Burdett J, 2003, International Education Journal, 4, 177
  17. Burdett J., 2009, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6, 62, 10.53761/1.6.1.7 · DOI
  18. Calloway School of Business and Accountancy of Wake Forest University, 2004, A Report on Recruiters' Perceptions of Undergraduate Business Schools and Students
  19. Campbell J. P., 1973, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 15, 10.1037/h0034185 · DOI
  20. Chapman K. J., 2001, Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 117, 10.1177/0273475301232005 · DOI
  21. Chen G., 2004, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 27, 10.5465/amle.2004.12436817 · DOI
  22. Chen Y., 2004, Journal of Education for Business, 79, 275, 10.3200/JOEB.79.5.275-282 · doi:10.3200/joeb.79.5.275-282
  23. Conway J. M., 1997, Human Performance, 10, 331, 10.1207/s15327043hup1004_2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Cronbach L. J., 1972, The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles
  25. Davis D., 2010, International Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 1
  26. Dochy F., 1999, Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331, 10.1080/03075079912331379935 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Dominick P. G., 1997, Group and Organization Management, 22, 508, 10.1177/1059601197224006 · DOI
  28. Druskat V. U., 1999, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 58, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.58 · DOI
  29. Erez A., 2002, Personnel Psychology, 55, 929, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00135.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Felder R. M., 2007, Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences, ACS Symposium Series, 970, 34, 10.1021/bk-2007-0970.ch004 · DOI
  31. Fellenz M. R, 2006, Journal of Management Education, 30, 570, 10.1177/1052562906286713 · DOI
  32. Gatfield T, 1999, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 365, 10.1080/0260293990240401 · DOI
  33. Gueldenzoph L. E., 2002, Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 9, 10.1177/108056990206500102 · DOI
  34. Hackman J. R, 1987, Handbook of organizational behavior, 315
  35. Hansen R. S, 2006, Journal of Education for Business, 82, 11, 10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Harris M. M., 1988, Personnel Psychology, 41, 43, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Harris T. C., 1997, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1694, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01620.x · DOI
  38. Hedge J. W., 1999, Technical Report, 336
  39. Hess P. W, 2007, Journal of Management Education, 31, 195, 10.1177/1052562906290933 · DOI
  40. Hooijberg R., 2009, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 483
  41. Hughes R. L., 2011, New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011, 53, 10.1002/ir.380 · DOI
  42. Inderrieden E. J., 2004, Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 460
  43. Jassawalla A., 2009, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 42, 10.5465/amle.2009.37012178 · DOI
  44. Johnston L., 2004, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 751, 10.1080/0260293042000227272 · doi:10.1080/0260293042000227272
  45. Kaufman D. B., 2000, Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 133, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00507.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kolb A. Y., 2005, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 193, 10.5465/amle.2005.17268566 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kruger J., 1999, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121, 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Layton R. A., 2010, Advances in Engineering Education, 2, 1
  49. London M., 1997, Group and Organization Management, 22, 162, 10.1177/1059601197222003 · DOI
  50. Loughry M. L., 2007, Educational Psychological Measurement, 67, 505, 10.1177/0013164406292085 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Loyd D. L., 2005, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 8, 10.5465/amle.2005.16132533 · DOI
  52. MacDonald H. A., 2009, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 227, 10.1037/a0015165 · DOI
  53. McCorkle D. E., 1999, Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106, 10.1177/0273475399212004 · DOI · Paper page
  54. McGourty J., 2001, The team developer: An assessment and skill building program. Student guidebook
  55. Mero N. P., 2007, Journal of Management, 33, 223, 10.1177/0149206306297633 · DOI
  56. Michaelsen L. K., 2004, Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching
  57. Millis B. J., 1998, Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty
  58. Neuman G. A., 1999, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376 · Paper page
  59. Oakley B., 2004, Journal of Student-Centered Learning, 2, 9
  60. Ohland M. W., 2005, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 319, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00856.x · DOI
  61. Paswan A. K., 2004, Journal of Education for Business, 79, 225, 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.225-231 · doi:10.3200/joeb.79.4.225-231
  62. Pfaff E., 2003, Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 37, 10.1177/0273475302250571 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Pope N. K. L, 2005, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 51, 10.1080/0260293042003243896 · DOI
  64. Raelin J, 2006, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 152, 10.5465/amle.2006.21253780 · DOI
  65. Rosenstein R., 1996, Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association
  66. Saavedra R., 1993, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.450 · DOI
  67. Schmitt N., 1984, Personnel Psychology, 37, 407, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00519.x · DOI · Paper page
  68. Sharma S., 2003, Research in Marketing, 20, 287, 10.1016/S0167-8116(03)00038-7 · DOI
  69. Shavelson R. J., 1991, Generalizability Theory
  70. Sheppard S., 2004, Peer assessment of student collaborative processes in undergraduate engineering education
  71. Shore T. H., 1992, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 42, 10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.42 · DOI
  72. Smith P. C., 1963, Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149, 10.1037/h0047060 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Sonnetag S., 2009, Group & Organization Management, 34, 37, 10.1177/1059601108329377 · DOI
  74. Stevens M. J., 1999, Journal of Management, 25, 207, 10.1177/014920639902500205 · doi:10.1177/014920639902500205 · Paper page
  75. Stevens M. J., 1994, Journal of Management, 20, 503, 10.1177/014920639402000210 · doi:10.1177/014920639402000210
  76. Taggar S., 2006, Small Group Research, 37, 87, 10.1177/1046496405284382 · DOI
  77. Taggar S., 2001, Small Group Research, 32, 698, 10.1177/104649640103200602 · DOI
  78. The Wall Street Journal/Harris Interactive Survey, 2002, The Wall Street Journal, 2002, R5
  79. Thomas G., 2011, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8, 10.53761/1.8.1.5 · DOI
  80. Ulloa B. C. R., 2004, Team Performance Management, 10, 145, 10.1108/13527590410569869 · DOI
  81. Van Duzer E., 2000, IEEE Transactions on Education, 43, 153, 10.1109/13.848067 · doi:10.1109/13.848067
  82. Verzat C., 2009, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 356
  83. Viswesvaran C., 1996, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Viswesvaran C., 2005, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108, 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Walker A, 2001, Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1, 28, 10.2304/plat.2001.1.1.28 · DOI
  86. Wang L., 2009, Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24, 108, 10.1177/0829573509335470 · DOI
  87. Willcoxson L. E, 2006, Journal of Management Education, 30, 798, 10.1177/1052562906287964 · DOI
  88. Woehr D. J, 1994, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 525, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.525 · DOI
  89. Woehr D. J., 1994, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189, 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00562.x · DOI · Paper page
  90. Young C. B., 2000, Journal of Education for Business, 76, 56, 10.1080/08832320009599051 · doi:10.1080/08832320009599051
  91. Zantow K., 2005, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 451, 10.5465/amle.2005.19086786 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Zhang B., 2009, Applied Measurement in Education, 22, 290, 10.1080/08957340902984075 · DOI
  93. Zhu J., 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management IEEM), 507, 10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674500 · DOI

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., Layton, R. A., Pomeranz, H. R., & Schmucker, D. G.
Venue
Academy of Management Learning & Education
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2012-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
609-630
ISSN
  • 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9585
DOI
10.5465/amle.2010.0177
OpenAlex
W2088559924
Cited by
559
References
3
FWCI
29.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.