Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction

Aggarwal, Praveen, O'Brien, Connie L.·2008·Journal of Marketing Education

Abstract

To respond to the expectations of the industry and business school accreditation bodies, marketing faculty have been making extensive use of group projects in their curricula. A common problem with the use of student groups, however, is that of social loafing. In this study, we identify some easy-to-implement project set-up factors and examine their impact on reducing the incidence of social loafing. We find that the incidence of social loafing increases with the scope of the project and the size of the student group assigned to the project. We also find that having multiple peer evaluations during the course of the project reduces social loafing. We study the impact of social loafing on students' satisfaction with group members' contribution and the perceived fairness of the project grade. Recommendations for reducing social loafing and increasing students' satisfaction with group projects are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0273475308322283

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1177/0273475304273350 · DOI
  2. Aronson, E., 1978, The jigsaw classroom
  3. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business., 2007, Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation
  4. 10.1177/0273475304273459 · doi:10.1177/0273475304273459
  5. 10.1177/027347539701900204 · doi:10.1177/027347539701900204
  6. 10.1177/027347539601800203 · doi:10.1177/027347539601800203
  7. 10.1080/08832320309598613 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0273475301232005 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0146167296222003 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/027347538901100308 · doi:10.1177/027347538901100308
  13. Cohen, S.G. (1994). Designing effective self-managing work teams. Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams (Vol. 1., pp. 67-102). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  14. 10.1177/001872679504800603 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/027347538100300114 · doi:10.1177/027347538100300114
  16. 10.1177/027347539802000202 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0273475302242004 · DOI
  18. Dixon, A.L., 2003, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 23, 205
  19. 10.1177/0273475307302019 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/108056990106400412 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/105256290202600404 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/104687818001100405 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/h0036204 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/2392936 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1177/027347538500700310 · doi:10.1177/027347538500700310
  26. 10.1177/0273475302241004 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/027347538100300203 · doi:10.1177/027347538100300203
  28. Johnson, D.W., 1991, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom
  29. 10.1080/0260293042000227272 · doi:10.1080/0260293042000227272
  30. 10.3200/CTCH.53.2.57-61 · DOI
  31. Kulik, J.A., 1979, College teaching. Research on teaching: Concepts, findings and implications
  32. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1177/105256299501900113 · doi:10.1177/105256299501900113
  34. Mahenthiran, S., 2000, International Journal of Educational Management, 14, 255
  35. 10.1177/0273475399212004 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Myers, D.G., 1990, Social psychology
  37. 10.1080/08832320309599708 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0273475302250571 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.3102/00346543065002129 · doi:10.3102/00346543065002129 · Paper page
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699 · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1080/106689299264990 · doi:10.1080/106689299264990
  43. 10.1177/027347539001200208 · DOI
  44. Taylor, T.E., 1976, Journal of College Science Teaching, 320
  45. 10.1037/h0047169 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Treisman, P.U., 1985, PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1
  47. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00619.x · DOI
  48. 10.1177/108056990106400413 · DOI
  49. 10.2307/256731 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Wales, C.E., 1978, The guided design approach
  51. 10.1080/00405849709543770 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/027347539101300208 · DOI
  53. 10.4135/9781483328218 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Education
Published
2008-05-19
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
255-264
ISSN
  • 0273-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6550
OpenAlex
W2140236135
Cited by
327
References
1
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0273475308322283
The paper
Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L. (2008). Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.