The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity
Abstract
We develop a model of organizational identity construction that reframes organizational identity within the broader context of manager-stakeholder relationships and more effectively integrates theory on organizational identity and organizational identification. We describe organizational identity as emerging from complex, dynamic, and reciprocal interactions among managers, organizational members, and other stakeholders. The model draws attention to organizational identity as negotiated cognitive images and to the embeddedness of organizational identity within different systems of organizational membership and meaning. Viewing organizational identity from the perspective of manager-stakeholder relationships provides a more parsimonious but more complete theory of organizational identity management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 3×
“When stakeholder behaviors are supportive of an organization's goals and actions, they strengthen managers' perceptions of organizational identity in a direction congruent with desired organizational images, and they become more resistant to change (Bem, 1972).”
BackgroundInfluentialIdentity Theory and Social Identity Theory
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695870 · Cited by 4,464
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 · Cited by 3,401
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Cited by
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609 · Cited by 3,336
Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070303258971 · Cited by 1,873
Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x · Cited by 1,653
Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research
Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006 · Cited by 599
Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T. (2013) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.12.0089 · Cited by 427
Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges
Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12196 · Cited by 418
Market-oriented sustainability: A conceptual framework and propositions
Crittenden, V. L., Crittenden, W. F., Ferrell, L. K., Ferrell, O. C., & Pinney, C. C. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0217-2 · Cited by 409
Big Data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis
Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2236-y · Cited by 382
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903321208907 · Cited by 362
Rethinking the Relationship Between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization
King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2008.16 · Cited by 343
On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility
Mena, S., Rintamäki, J., Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0208 · Cited by 209
Does corporate social responsibility impact on employee engagement?
Ferreira, P., & Real de Oliveira, E. (2014) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-09-2013-0070 · Cited by 174
Chen, K.-H., Huang, L., & Ye, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-01-2022-0050 · Cited by 116
Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations
Kasper-Fuehrer, E. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(01)00090-3 · Cited by 103
Identity in Franchise Systems: The Role of Franchisee Associations
Lawrence, B., & Kaufmann, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2010.11.003 · Cited by 67
The effects of virtualness on teamwork behavioral components: The role of shared mental models
Schmidtke, J. M., & Cummings, A. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.011 · Cited by 61
Wu, W., & Tsai, C. (2008) · International Journal of Commerce and Management · doi:10.1108/10569210710833617 · Cited by 52
The member wears four hats: a member identification framework for co-operative enterprises
Mamouni Limnios, E., Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G. N., & Siddique, K. H. (2018) · Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jcom.2018.03.003 · Cited by 51
Hafer, J. A., & Ran, B. (2016) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1202080 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-62
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135583295
- Cited by
- 1,135
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 33.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
