The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example
Abstract
Network forms of organization, unlike hierarchies or marketplaces, are agile and are constantly adapting as new links are added and dysfunctional ones dropped. We review some of the theoretical and methodological accomplishments and challenges of contemporary research on organizational networks. We then offer an analytic framework that can be used to specify and statistically test simultaneously multilevel, multitheoretical hypotheses about the structural tendencies of organizational networks. We conclude with an empirical study illustrating some of the capabilities of this framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Self-citationBurt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems
Hollingshead, A. B. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1358 · Cited by 471
Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems
Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M. E., Monge, P. R., & Ryan, T. (1996) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00120.x · Cited by 260
Cited by
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167742 · Cited by 3,365
Self-citation1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
A Network Analytic Approach to Understanding Cross-Platform Audience Behavior
Ksiazek, T. B. (2011) · Journal of Media Economics · doi:10.1080/08997764.2011.626985 · Cited by 67
McAuliffe, E., De Brún, A., Ward, M., O’Shea, M., Cunningham, U., O’Donovan, R., McGinley, S., Fitzsimons, J., Corrigan, S., & McDonald, N. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017569 · Cited by 38
Zhu, X., Tu, S.-P., Sewell, D., Yao, N. (., Mishra, V., Dow, A., & Banas, C. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.012 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 681-703
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2170643162
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 63.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
