Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4,911

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Upper Echelons Theory: An Update

Hambrick, Donald C.·2007·Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The central premise of upper echelons theory is that executives' experiences, values, and personalities greatly influence their interpretations of the situations they face and, in turn, affect their choices. At the invitation of the editor, I recap the AMR article in which the theory was originally presented (Hambrick & Mason, 1984), discuss subsequent refinements of the theory, and lay out several promising avenues for future upper echelons research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Balkin D. B., 1990, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 153, 10.1002/smj.4250110207 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bantel K., 1989, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107, 10.1002/smj.4250100709 · DOI
  3. Boeker W., 1997, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 152, 10.2307/257024 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carpenter M. A., 2001, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533, 10.2307/3069368 · DOI
  5. Carpenter M. A., 2004, Journal of Management, 30, 749, 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001 · DOI
  6. Cho T. S., 2006, Organization Science, 17, 453, 10.1287/orsc.1060.0192 · DOI
  7. Crossland C., Strategic Management Journal.
  8. Cyert R. M., 1963, A behavioral theory of the firm
  9. D'Aveni R. A., 1990, Organization Science, 1, 121, 10.1287/orsc.1.2.121 · DOI
  10. DiMaggio P. J., 1983, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Eisenhardt K. M., 1988, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737, 10.2307/256337 · DOI
  12. Eisenhardt K. M., 1990, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504, 10.2307/2393315 · DOI
  13. Finkelstein S., 1992, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505, 10.2307/256485 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Finkelstein S., 1990, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484, 10.2307/2393314 · DOI
  15. Finkelstein S., 1996, Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations
  16. Finkelstein S., Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards
  17. Garrow J., 1995, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 49, 1
  18. Hambrick D. C., 1994, Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 171
  19. Hambrick D. C., 1995, California Management Review, 37, 110, 10.2307/41165801 · DOI
  20. Hambrick D. C., 1998, Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation, 123
  21. Hambrick D. C., 2005, Great minds in management: The process of theory development, 109, 10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0006 · DOI
  22. Hambrick D. C., 1987, Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369
  23. Hambrick D. C., 2005, Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 307, 10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26008-7 · DOI
  24. Hambrick D. C., 2005, Academy of Management Review, 30, 472, 10.5465/amr.2005.17293355 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hambrick D. C., 1991, Academy of Management Review, 16, 719, 10.5465/amr.1991.4279621 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hambrick D. C., 1984, Academy of Management Review, 9, 193, 10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hannan M. T., 1977, American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929, 10.1086/226424 · DOI
  28. Henderson A. D., 2006, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 447, 10.1002/smj.524 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hofstede G., 2001, Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations
  30. Jackson S. E., 1992, Advances in Strategic Management, 8, 345
  31. Kadushin C., 1995, American Sociological Review, 60, 202, 10.2307/2096384 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lawler E. E., 1990, Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems
  33. Lawrence B. S., 1997, Organization Science, 8, 1, 10.1287/orsc.8.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Li J. T., 2005, Academy of Management Review, 48, 794, 10.5465/amj.2005.18803923 · DOI
  35. Lieberson S., 1972, American Sociological Review, 37, 117, 10.2307/2094020 · DOI
  36. Lorsch J. W., 1989, Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's boards
  37. Lubatkin M., 2006, Journal of Management, 32, 646, 10.1177/0149206306290712 · DOI
  38. March J. G., 1958, Organizations
  39. McLaughlin D. J., 1991, Executive compensation: A strategic guide for the 1990's, 59
  40. Milgrom P. R., 1992, Economics, organization, and management
  41. Miller D., 1991, Management Science, 37, 34, 10.1287/mnsc.37.1.34 · DOI
  42. Miller D., 1986, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 539, 10.2307/2392963 · DOI
  43. Mischel W., 1977, Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology, 217
  44. Sanders W. G., 2001, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 477, 10.2307/3069365 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Simons T., 1999, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662, 10.2307/256987 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Smith K. G., 1994, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412, 10.2307/2393297 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Useem M., 1996, Investor capitalism: How money managers are changing the face of corporate America
  48. Ward R. D., 1997, 21st century corporate board
  49. Westphal J. D., 2003, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 361, 10.2307/3556678 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 4,911

Metadata

Authors
Hambrick, D. C.
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2007-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
334-343
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
DOI
10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
OpenAlex
W2139382679
Cited by
4,911
References
2
FWCI
90.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.