Cited by 459Management and Organizational StudiesGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactRegulation and Compliance Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Means versus Ends in Opaque Institutional Fields: Trading off Compliance and Achievement in Sustainability Standard Adoption

Open access

Wijen, Frank·2014·Academy of Management Review

DOI 10.5465/amr.2012.0218

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

The long-standing discussion on decoupling has recently moved from adopters not implementing the agreed-upon policies to compliant adopters not achieving the goals intended by institutional entrepreneurs. This “means-ends decoupling” prevails especially in highly opaque fields, where practices, causality, and performance are hard to understand and chart. I conceptualize the conditions under which the adoption of institutions in relatively opaque fields leads to the achievement of the envisaged goals. Voluntary sustainability standards governing socioenvironmental issues illustrate these arguments. I argue that the lack of field transparency drives institutional entrepreneurs to create and maintain concrete and uniform rules, apply strong incentives, and disseminate “best practices” to ensure substantive adopter compliance. However, such rigid institutions are ill-equipped to deal with the causal complexity and practice multiplicity underlying opacity while they smother adopter agency. The ensuing tension between substantive compliance and goal achievement leads to an inherent trade-off: institutional entrepreneurs who remedy the policy-practice decoupling may enhance the disparity between means and ends, and vice versa. While sustainability standards and other institutions in highly opaque fields can, therefore, not fully achieve the envisaged goals, the trade-off can be reduced through systemically designed institutions that promote goal internalization and contain niche institutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2012.0218

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Untitled work
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,639
The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,973
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across NationsCulture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Second Edition), by HofstedeGeert. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389951 · Cited by 21,688
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 1×
“Carefully examining whether applicants endorse the institution’s goals, regularly training adopters about these goals, and encouraging adopters to share their experiences with other adopters are measures conducive to goal internalization (Gottschalg & Zollo, 2007; Nonaka, 1994).”
Background
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“For instance, poverty is a ‘wicked problem’ (Rittel & Webber, 1973) that has numerous, interrelated causes and consequences, not only economic but also social, political, and historical ones, and poor people can be caught in poverty traps due to the concurrence of multiple forces (Easterly, 2006;…”
Background
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333

Show all 186 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

Banerjee A. V., 2007, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 141, 10.1257/089533007780095556 · DOI · Paper page
Baum J., 2011, OMT Distinguished Scholar presentation at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
Boschetti F., 2011, Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 13, 133
Bromley P., 2012, Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483, 10.1080/19416520.2012.684462 · DOI · Paper page
Carson R., 1962, Silent spring
Dalton D., 2007, Academy of Management Annals, 1, 1, 10.1080/078559806 · DOI
Delmas M., Business & Society
Greenwood R., 2011, Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317, 10.1080/19416520.2011.590299 · DOI · Paper page
King A., 2012, The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, 103
Levy D., 2012, The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, 591
López R., 2007, Handbook of sustainable development, 220
Pache A. C., 2010, Academy of Management Review, 35, 455, 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368 · DOI
Scott R., 2001, Institutions and organizations

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 459

On Valuing Women: Advancing an Intersectional Theory of Gender Diversity in Organizations
Kaufmann, L., & Derry, R. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0382 · Cited by 56
Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council
Wijen, F., & Chiroleu‐Assouline, M. (2019) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026619831449 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Extending Social Sustainability to Suppliers: The Role of GVC Governance Strategies and Supplier Country Institutions
Castaldi, S., Wilhelm, M. M., Beugelsdijk, S., & van der Vaart, T. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05083-4 · Cited by 47
Organizing Means–Ends Decoupling: Core–Compartment Separations in Fast Fashion
Stål, H. I., & Corvellec, H. (2021) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503211001856 · Cited by 47
Corporate sustainability and indigenous community engagement in the extractive industry
Boiral, O., Saizarbitoria, I. H., & Brotherton, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.311 · Cited by 45
From Compliance to Progress: A Sensemaking Perspective on the Governance of Corruption
Schembera, S., Haack, P., & Scherer, A. G. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1614 · Cited by 51
Corporate sustainability standards in multi-tier supply chains – an institutional entrepreneurship perspective
Grimm, J. H., Hofstetter, J. S., & Sarkis, J. (2022) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.2017053 · Cited by 47
Is private sustainability governance a myth? Evaluating major sustainability certifications in primary production: A mixed methods meta-study
Dietz, T., Biber‐Freudenberger, L., Deal, L., & Börner, J. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107546 · Cited by 42
DIFFUSION OF GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY STANDARDS: THE INSTITUTIONAL FIT OF THE ASC-SHRIMP STANDARD IN INDONESIA
Schouten, G., Vellema, S., & van Wijk, J. (2016) · Revista de Administração de Empresas · doi:10.1590/s0034-759020160405 · Cited by 42
Private Governance as Regulatory Substitute or Complement? A Comparative Institutional Approach to CSR Adoption by Multinational Corporations
Jackson, G., & Rathert, N. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20160000049015 · Cited by 42
Inside the multi-tier supply firm: exploring responses to institutional pressures and challenges for sustainable supply management
Nath, S. D., & Eweje, G. (2021) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-09-2020-0651 · Cited by 27
SMEs and Certified Management Standards: The Effect of Motives and Timing on Implementation and Commitment
Iatridis, K., Kuznetsov, A., & Whyman, P. B. (2016) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.9 · Cited by 42
Household informedness and policy analytics for the collection and recycling of household hazardous waste in California
Lim-Wavde, K., Kauffman, R. J., & Dawson, G. S. (2017) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.10.007 · Cited by 41
A Novel NGO Approach to Facilitate the Adoption of Sustainable Innovations in Low-Income Countries: Lessons from Small-scale Farms in Nicaragua
Dyck, B., & Silvestre, B. S. (2018) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840617747921 · Cited by 43
Detecting False Accounts in Intermediated Voluntary Disclosure
Callery, P. J., & Perkins, J. L. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2018.0229 · Cited by 41
The hidden side of sub-supplier firms' sustainability – an empirical analysis
Nath, S. D., Eweje, G., & Sajjad, A. (2020) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-05-2019-0403 · Cited by 41
Meaning, Mission, and Measurement: How Organizational Performance Measurement Shapes Perceptions of Work as Worthy
Beer, H. A., Micheli, P. G., & Besharov, M. H.-P. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0916 · Cited by 51
Internationalization, institutional pressures in foreign markets, and environmental sustainability
Amer, E. (2022) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2022.100974 · Cited by 50
Human Rights in the Oil and Gas Industry: When Are Policies and Practices Enough to Prevent Abuse?
Olsen, T. D., Rehbein, K. A., Snelson-Powell, A. C., & Westermann-Behaylo, M. K. (2021) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503211017435 · Cited by 39
Dismantling or Disguising Racialization?: Defining Racialized Change Work in the Context of Postsecondary Grantmaking
McCambly, H. N., & Colyvas, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muac021 · Cited by 42
Third-Party Certifications as an Organizational Performance Liability
Desai, V. M. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316659112 · Cited by 37
The EU Taxonomy, sustainability reporting and financial institutions: understanding the elements driving regulatory uncertainty
García-Torea, N., Luque‐Vílchez, M., & Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, P. (2024) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1080/01559982.2024.2364953 · Cited by 38
When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation
Lauriano, L. A., Reinecke, J., & Etter, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04954-6 · Cited by 46
How do external regulations shape the design of ethical tools in organisations? An open polity and sociology of compliance perspective
Khaled, W. B., & Gond, J. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726719828437 · Cited by 37
Serving Magically Perfect Fruit Globally: Local nesting in translating multiple standards
Arnold, N., & Loconto, A. M. (2020) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840620935858 · Cited by 37
More Than Meets the Eye: Misconduct and Decoupling Against Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency
Marques, L., de Morais, D. O. C., & Terra, A. (2024) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1177/10591478231224928 · Cited by 39
Fragmented institutional fields and their impact on manufacturing environmental practices
Shi, G.-J., Baldwin, J., Koh, S. C. L., & Choi, T. Y. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1353712 · Cited by 24
Media Coverage of Firms in the Presence of Multiple Signals: A Configurational Approach
Bettinazzi, E. L. M., Jacqueminet, A., Neumann, K., & Snoeren, P. R. (2023) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1791 · Cited by 36
No Firm Is an Island: The Role of Population-Level Actors in Organizational Learning from Failure
Madsen, P. M., & Desai, V. M. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1199 · Cited by 35
Fostering compliance with voluntary sustainability standards through institutional design: An analytic framework and empirical application
Depoorter, C., & Marx, A. (2023) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12573 · Cited by 45
Global governance in new public environmental management: An international and intertemporal comparison of voluntary standards' impacts
Wagner, M. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2417 · Cited by 36
Managerialisation, accountability and everyday resistance in the NGO sector: Whose interests matter?
Girei, E. (2022) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102418 · Cited by 34
Did India’s CSR Mandate Enhance or Diminish Firm Value?
Panwar, R., Pandey, V., Suddaby, R., & Vidal, N. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503221085962 · Cited by 41
Towards a more comprehensive assessment of FDI’s societal impact
Wiessner, Y. T., Giuliani, E., Wijen, F., & Doh, J. P. (2023) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-023-00636-9 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Green cement production in India: prioritization and alleviation of barriers using the best–worst method
Marinelli, M., & Janardhanan, M. N. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20217-x · Cited by 33
The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework
Sankaran, S., Jacobsson, M., & Blomquist, T. (2021) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2814 · Cited by 46
Decoupling Under Scrutiny: Consistency of Managerial Talk and Action in the Age of Nonprofit Accountability
Brandtner, C. (2021) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764021995240 · Cited by 31
When less is more: HRM implementation, legitimacy and decoupling
Brandl, J., Keegan, A. E., & Kozica, A. (2021) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12388 · Cited by 35
The role of legitimacy in pursuing environmentally responsible transportation practices
Ellram, L. M., & Golicic, S. L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.077 · Cited by 31
Organisational learning for the common good: an emerging model
Ricciardi, F., Cantino, V., & Rossignoli, C. (2020) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2019.1673676 · Cited by 31
Green by Affiliation? Ownership Identity and Environmental Management System Adoption in Chinese Business Groups
Wang, R., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Wijen, F. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221143721 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Why Do Firms Participate in Voluntary Environmental Programs? A Meta-Analysis of the Role of Institutions, Resources, and Program Stringency
Tashman, P., Flankova, S., van Essen, M., & Marano, V. (2021) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026621990063 · Cited by 29
Market Mediators and the Tradeoffs of Legitimacy-Seeking Behaviors in a Nascent CategoryPreprint
Lee, B., Hiatt, S. R., & Lounsbury, M. D. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2615964 · Cited by 30
Inexpert Supervision: Field Evidence on Boards’ Oversight of Cybersecurity
Lowry, M. R., Vance, A., & Vance, M. D. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.04147 · Cited by 31
Recoupling work beyond COSO: A longitudinal case study of Enterprise-wide Risk Management
Jemaa, F. (2022) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2022.101369 · Cited by 33
Conflict between Explicit and Tacit Public Service Bargains in U.K. Executive Agencies
Elston, T. (2016) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12191 · Cited by 31
Impact of environmental performance and policy on firm environmental reputation
de Blas, M. D. M. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2019-1223 · Cited by 28
Environmental, Technical, and Representational Uncertainty: A Framework for Making Sense of the Hidden Complexity of Educational Change
Yurkofsky, M. M. (2022) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x221078590 · Cited by 31
Contexts of enterprise policy-making – an institutional perspective
Xheneti, M. (2016) · Entrepreneurship and Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2016.1271021 · Cited by 31
Eco-Friendly Brands to Drive Sustainable Development: Replication and Extension of the Brand Experience Scale in a Cross-National Context
Saari, U. A., Baumgartner, R., & Mäkinen, S. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9071286 · Cited by 26
Coupling, Not Decoupling, Should Be Institutional Theory's Mantra: A Rejoinder to Haack and Schoeneborn
Wijen, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0464 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Opportunistic behaviors in green signaling: When do firms engage in symbolic green product preannouncement?
Truong, Y., & Pinkse, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.015 · Cited by 27
Materiality of sustainable practices and the institutional logics of adoption: A comparative study of chemical road transportation companies
Rossoni, L., Poli, I. T., de Sinay, M. C. F., & de Araújo, G. A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119058 · Cited by 27
De‐internationalization: An organizational institutionalism perspective
Mandrinos, S., & Lim, W. M. (2023) · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · doi:10.1002/joe.22195 · Cited by 30
The Corporate Governance of Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Proposal for More Integrated ResearchPreprint
Aguilera, R. V., Correa, J. A. A., Marano, V., & Tashman, P. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3760077 · Cited by 30
Mind the gap: Grass roots ‘brokering’ to improve labour standards in global supply chains
Kaine, S., & Josserand, E. (2017) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726717727046 · Cited by 25
Emerging Paradigms of Corporate Social Responsibility, Regulation, and Governance: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium
Arora, B., Kourula, A. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04236-2 · Cited by 26
In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self‐Regulation
Flowers, M. E., Matisoff, D. C., & Noonan, D. S. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2547 · Cited by 24
Corporate social responsibility decoupling in developing countries: Current research and a future agenda
Khan, M., & Lockhart, J. C. (2022) · Business and Society Review · doi:10.1111/basr.12254 · Cited by 29
Assessing companies' decent work practices: An analysis of ESG rating methodologies
Louche, C., Delautre, G., & Pimentel, G. B. (2022) · International Labour Review · doi:10.1111/ilr.12370 · Cited by 26
When Does Corporate Social Performance Pay for International Firms?
Muller, A. R. (2018) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650318816957 · Cited by 25
How Companies Restrain Means–Ends Decoupling: A Comparative Case Study of CSR Implementation
Athanasopoulou, A., Marti, E., Risi, D., & Schlindwein, E. K. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13043 · Cited by 28
Smart disclosure: an enabler for multinationals to reduce human rights violations in global supply chains
Wang, S. L., Lee, Y., & Li, D. (2024) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-024-00698-3 · Cited by 27
Standardization: Research Trends, Current Debates, and Interdisciplinarity
Grillo, F., Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. J., Bekkers, R., Tasselli, S., Yousefi, A., & van de Kaa, G. (2024) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2023.0072 · Cited by 28
Organized Decoupling of Management Control Systems: An Exploratory Study of Traders’ Unethical Behavior
Laguecir, A., & Leca, B. L. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04741-3 · Cited by 23
Institutional Parasites
Rintamäki, J., Parker, S., & Spicer, A. (2024) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2021.0502 · Cited by 25
When Does a Firm Fail to Walk the Talk? Decoupling in International Expansion
Xu, K., Shi, W., Zhao, J., & Chen, X. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13089 · Cited by 24
Raising the Bar: Values-Driven Niche Creation in U.S. Bean-to-Bar Chocolate
Woolley, J. L., Pozner, J., & DeSoucey, M. (2021) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2021.0147 · Cited by 23
Safety training in context: technical, cultural and political factors affecting its design, delivery and transfer
Pilbeam, C. J., & Karanikas, N. (2023) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2023.03.004 · Cited by 22
Sustaining the Integration of Social Objectives Over Time: A Case-Based Analysis of Access to Medicine in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Bünder, T., Rathert, N., & Mair, J. (2023) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503231182667 · Cited by 21
Determinants and benefits of over‐certification: A signaling theory perspective
Gil, J. V., Daddi, T., Scarpellini, S., & Marrucci, L. (2024) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2901 · Cited by 22
Lifting Women Up: Gender Quotas and the Advancement of Women on Corporate Boards
Gibert, A., & Fedorets, A. (2024) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12609 · Cited by 21
Nonconformance With Regulatory Codes in the Nonprofit Sector: Accountability and the Discursive Coupling of Means and Ends
Dick, P., & Coule, T. M. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650317748638 · Cited by 23
Shedding lights on organizational decoupling in publicly funded R&D consortia: An institutional perspective on open innovation
Bertello, A., Bernardi, P. D., Ferraris, A., & Bresciani, S. (2022) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121433 · Cited by 20
Diverse Organizational Adoption of Institutions in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility
Jastram, S., Otto, A. H., & Minulla, T. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05085-2 · Cited by 20
The University as a Critical Institution?
Hladchenko, M., Antonowicz, D., & de Boer, H. F. (2017) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-116-2 · Cited by 20
Set & Done? Trade‐offs between Stakeholder Expectation and Attainment Pressures in Corporate Carbon Target Management
Callery, P. J., & Kim, E. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13140 · Cited by 21
Delivering sustainability in supply networks: Achieving networked multi‐stakeholder collaborations
Josserand, E., Kaine, S., & Nikolova, N. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2065 · Cited by 21
Institutional pressures and supplier involvement: a perspective on sustainability
Khurshid, A., Muzaffar, A., & Bhutta, M. K. S. (2021) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-021-00181-4 · Cited by 19
Big Profits, Big Harm? Exploring the Link Between Firm Financial Performance and Human Rights Misbehavior
Giuliani, E., Nieri, F., & Vezzulli, A. (2023) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503221144994 · Cited by 22
Theorizing for Positive Impact
Hernandez, M., & Haack, P. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2023.0180 · Cited by 19
Does confucian culture restrain ESG decoupling? Evidence from China
Wan, P., Yang, Y., & Chen, X. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104605 · Cited by 18
How Collaborating with NGOs Makes Green Innovations More Desirable
Schweitzer, F. M., & Meng, Y. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503221084733 · Cited by 18
Institutional means-ends decoupling work in industrial R&D project implementation
Jabbouri, R., Truong, Y., Schneckenberg, D., & Palmer, M. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.012 · Cited by 18
The Challenge of Implementing Voluntary Sustainability Standards: A Dynamic Framework on the Tension between Adherence and Adaptation
Nava, L., & Tampe, M. (2022) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2022.1 · Cited by 21
Mandatory corporate social responsibility in India: reporting reality, issues and way forward
Taneja, P. K., Jain, A., Joshı, M., & Kansal, M. (2021) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-11-2020-1063 · Cited by 17
From Policy-Practice to Means-Ends Decoupling in Organizations: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research
Jabbouri, R., Schneckenberg, D., & Truong, Y. (2022) · Management international · doi:10.7202/1088440ar · Cited by 19
‘Social compliance decoupling cascades’ in global supply chains: A review of the implementation of labour codes
Cao, Y., & Jayasinghe, M. M. (2023) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12357 · Cited by 17
Being green makes me greener? An evaluation of sustainability rebound effects
Cezarino, L. O., Murad, M. D. Q., Resende, P. V., & Sales, W. F. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121436 · Cited by 17
Does institutional change during the green transition influence low-carbon innovation? Evidence from China's Low-Carbon City Project
Du, L., & Yang, K. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103274 · Cited by 16
Outcomes of Paradox Responses in Corporate Sustainability: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis
Albertsen, R. R. (2024) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503241255498 · Cited by 16
Modifying head nurse messages during daily conversations as leverage for safety climate improvement: a randomised field experiment
Zohar, D. M., Werber, Y. T., Marom, R., Curlau, B., & Blondheim, O. (2017) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005910 · Cited by 15
Issue opacity and sustainability standard effectiveness
Wijen, F., & Flowers, M. E. (2022) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.12485 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
The Lean Impact Start-Up Framework: Fueling Innovation for Positive Societal Change
Bacq, S. C., & Wang, S. L. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063241240713 · Cited by 14
Strategic responses of stigmatized Chinese manufacturing firms to formal and informal environmental regulative pressures through enhanced corporate social responsibility effort
Xu, J., Wei, J., & Chen, H. A. (2019) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1744 · Cited by 15
Economic Analysis of Widespread Adoption of CSR and Sustainability Reporting Standards: Structured Overview of CSR LiteraturePreprint
Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3313793 · Cited by 15
Join In . . . and Drop Out? Firm Adoption of and Disengagement From Voluntary Environmental Programs
Callery, P. J. (2021) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/10860266211011233 · Cited by 16
Clarifying ends in institutional decoupling theory: insights from social impact research
Jastram, S., & Försterling, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-023-01170-8 · Cited by 13
Harambee! A Triadic Perspective on Social Impact: Organizations, Evaluators, and Target Beneficiaries in Kenya
Kim, A. J. S. (2024) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392241303580 · Cited by 15
Understanding the Changes of the Higher Education Governance in Poland and Ukraine
Hladchenko, M., Antonowicz, D., & de Boer, H. (2017) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6351-116-2_4 · Cited by 13

Authors: Wijen, F.
Affiliations: Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author: Wijen, Frank
ORCID: Wijen, Frank
Venue: Academy of Management Review
Publisher: Academy of Management
Published: 2014-07
Volume: 39
Issue: 3
Pages: 302-323
ISSN: 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
1930-3807
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2012.0218
OpenAlex: W2135064655
Cited by: 459
References: 186
Citations by year: 2026: 71 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
FWCI: 49.12
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
pure.eur.nl
Locations: Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
ERIM Top-Core Articles
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Social Sciences › Public Administration › Regulation and Compliance Studies
Keywords: means-ends decoupling, institutional entrepreneurs, institutional field, opacity, voluntary sustainability standards, policy-practice gap, institutional design, goal internalization, causal complexity, best practices dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Means versus Ends in Opaque Institutional Fields: Trading off Compliance and Achievement in Sustainability Standard Adoption

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks