The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media and Their Affordances for Organizing: A Review and Agenda for Research
Abstract
Social media—computer-mediated tools of the Web 2.0 generation that make it possible for anyone to create, circulate, share, and exchange information in a variety of formats and with multiple communities—have become increasingly widespread in today’s organizations. Social media have started to affect multiple organizational phenomena and processes. This article pursues three interrelated goals. First, it provides a theoretical framework, based upon the concept of affordances, to theorize the potential implications of social media use for organizing. Second, it reviews existing scholarship on social media and organizing, highlighting social media diffusion, use, and implications for organizational processes of communication, collaboration, and knowledge sharing. Third, it relies upon the affordance perspective and existing scholarship to articulate an agenda for future research on social media and organizing, advocating for a diversification of the phenomena under study and for greater diversity and innovativeness in the methodological approaches devised to investigate these phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571
Technologies, texts and affordances.
Hutchby, I. (2001) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/s0038038501000219 · Cited by 2,012
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
Self-citationTechnological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810385389 · Cited by 1,349 · cited 5×
“1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Users may also be able to maintain a set of “latent ties” (Ellison et al., 2011) through social media.”
InfluentialEnacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0103 · Cited by 1,071
Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change
van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.213 · Cited by 832 · cited 1×
“…implementation and use of social media in organizations, combined with the slow pace required for quality longitudinal research to be completed (Langley, 1999; Van de Ven & Huber, 1990), helps explain the relative dearth of long-term examinations of the use of social media in organizations so far.”
Cited by
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. K. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0127 · Cited by 377
Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks
Jabagi, N., Croteau, A.-M., Audebrand, L. K., & Marsan, J. (2019) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-06-2018-0255 · Cited by 354
Chatbots or me? Consumers’ switching between human agents and conversational agents
Li, C.-Y., & Zhang, J.-T. (2023) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103264 · Cited by 128
Microphones, not megaphones: Functional crowdworker voice regimes on digital work platforms
Gegenhuber, T., Ellmer, M., & Schüßler, E. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726720915761 · Cited by 115
The Perils and Promises of Self-Disclosure on Social Media
Richey, M., Gonibeed, A., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2018) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9806-7 · Cited by 66
Yang, J., Amrollahi, A., & Marrone, M. (2024) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101864 · Cited by 59
Mobilising new frontiers in digital transformation research: A problematization review
Ashrafi, A., Constantinides, P., Mehandjiev, N., & Thatcher, J. B. (2025) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12531 · Cited by 33
Koljonen, T., & Chan, C. K. (2024) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2022.1093 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Leonardi, P. M., & Vaast, E.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-188
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2570170593
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 86.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
