Cited by 418Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueFacilities and Workplace Management

Impact of Windows and Daylight Exposure on Overall Health and Sleep Quality of Office Workers: A Case-Control Pilot Study

Open access
Boubekri, Mohamed, Cheung, Ivy N., Reid, Kathryn J., Wang, Chia-Hui, Zee, Phyllis C.·2014·Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Study objective This research examined the impact of daylight exposure on the health of office workers from the perspective of subjective well-being and sleep quality as well as actigraphy measures of light exposure, activity, and sleep-wake patterns.Methods Participants (N = 49) included 27 workers working in windowless environments and 22 comparable workers in workplaces with significantly more daylight. Windowless environment is defined as one without any windows or one where workstations were far away from windows and without any exposure to daylight. Well-being of the office workers was measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36), while sleep quality was measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). In addition, a subset of participants (N = 21; 10 workers in windowless environments and 11 workers in workplaces with windows) had actigraphy recordings to measure light exposure, activity, and sleep-wake patterns.Results Workers in windowless environments reported poorer scores than their counterparts on two SF-36 dimensions--role limitation due to physical problems and vitality--as well as poorer overall sleep quality from the global PSQI score and the sleep disturbances component of the PSQI. Compared to the group without windows, workers with windows at the workplace had more light exposure during the workweek, a trend toward more physical activity, and longer sleep duration as measured by actigraphy.Conclusions We suggest that architectural design of office environments should place more emphasis on sufficient daylight exposure of the workers in order to promote office workers' health and well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5664/jcsm.3780

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural daylight at high intensities as experienced outside buildings improves sleep quality.

    “Natural daylight at high intensities as experienced outside buildings has previously been shown to (1) advance the timing of sleep to earlier hours, (2) affect the duration of sleep, and (3) improve sleep quality.”

    From Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that office workers with greater workplace light exposure had better overall sleep-quality scores than workers without windows. It does not establish that high-intensity daylight experienced outdoors improves sleep quality; the authors say further research is needed to determine beneficial light intensities. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Daytime exposure to white light enriched in short-wavelength content is associated with increased sleep quality.

    “Several studies report that daytime exposure to white light enriched in short-wavelength content was associated with increased evening fatigue [91], and sleep quality [16, 39, 91], decreased sleep-onset latency [39], and increased slow-wave sleep accumulation [92], which is related to the dissipation of the homeostatic sleep pressure [1, 14, 34].”

    From Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion reports that office workers with windows had more workplace light exposure and better overall sleep-quality scores than workers without windows. But the study did not test short-wavelength-enriched white light: the Discussion says its measurements could not distinguish daylight from artificial light or analyze specific wavelengths. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure to daylight increases sleep duration, possibly by advancing sleep timing.

    “Likewise, exposure to daylight has been shown to increase sleep duration, possibly by advancing sleep timing [16].”

    From Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood (2019) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Abstract reports longer actigraphy-measured sleep duration among office workers with windows and more workplace light exposure. The Sleep Quality of the Two Groups of Workers section reports no significant difference in sleep onset time, so it does not establish that earlier sleep timing explains the longer sleep. The case-control comparison also does not establish that daylight caused the increase. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Thayer BM. Daylighting and Productivity at Lockheed. Solar Today 1995;9:26-29.
  2. Åkerstedt T, Czeisler C, Dinges D, Horne J. Accidents and sleepiness: A consensus statement. At: International Conference on Work Hours, Sleep and Accidents. Stockholm, Sweden: J Sleep Res 1994;3.
  3. Kripke D, Mullaney D, Savides TJ, Gillin JC. Phototherapy for nonseasonal major depressive disorders. In: Rosenthal N, Blehar N, eds. Phototherapy for nonseasonal major depressive disorders. New York: The Guilford Press, 1989:342-56.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boubekri, M., Cheung, I. N., Reid, K. J., Wang, C.-H., & Zee, P. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Published
2014-06-15
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
603-611
ISSN
  • 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9397
OpenAlex
W2024191758
Cited by
418
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG011412)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5T32 HL790915, T32HL007909)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
daylight exposure, windows, office workers, sleep quality, subjective well-being, light exposure, physical activity, sleep-wake patterns, office architecture, role limitations, vitality
MeSH terms
Adult, Facility Design and Construction, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sunlight, Case-Control Studies, Workplace, Young Adult, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review