Cited by 108Sleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related FatigueHealth disparities and outcomes

Sleep duration and self-rated health: The national health interview survey 2008

Open access
Shankar, Anoop, Charumathi, Sabanayagam, Kalidindi, Sita·2011·SLEEP

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-rated health (SRH) has been shown to consistently predict overall mortality and cardiovascular mortality in several population-based studies across the world. Similarly sleep duration have been found to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. However, relatively few studies have examined the association between sleep duration and SRH, and the results have not been consistent. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of n = 20,663 National Health Interview Survey 2008 participants ≥ 18 years of age (56.2% women). Sleep duration was categorized as ≤ 5 h, 6 h, 7 h, 8 h, and ≥ 9 h. The main outcome interest was fair/poor SRH (n = 3043). RESULTS: We found both short and long sleep duration to be independently associated with fair/poor SRH, independent of age, sex, race-ethnicity, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index, physical activity, depression, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and CVD. Compared with a sleep duration of 7 h (referent), the multivariate odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of fair/poor SRH was 2.29 (1.86-2.83), 1.68 (1.42-2.00), 1.38 (1.18-1.61), and 1.98 (1.63-2.40) for sleep duration ≤ 5, 6, 8, and ≥ 9 h. This association persisted in subgroup analyses by gender, race-ethnicity, and body mass index categories. CONCLUSION: Compared with sleep duration of 7 h, there was a positive association between both shorter and longer sleep duration and fair/poor self-rated health in a representative sample of US adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.1232

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shankar, A., Charumathi, S., & Kalidindi, S.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Shankar, Anoop
Venue
SLEEP
Published
2011-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1173-1177
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2083542549
Cited by
108
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R03ES018888)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
sleep duration, self-rated health, short sleep duration, long sleep, cardiovascular disease, mortality, health perception, adults, sex differences, racial and ethnic differences, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sleep, Time Factors, United States, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review