Cited by 84Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disorders

Acute versus chronic partial sleep deprivation in middle-aged people: differential effect on performance and sleepiness

Open access
Philip, Pierre, Sagaspe, Patricia, Prague, Mélanie, Tassi, Patricia, Capelli, Aurore, Bioulac, Bernard, Commenges, Daniel, Taillard, Jacques·2012·SLEEP

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of acute sleep deprivation and chronic sleep restriction on vigilance, performance, and self-perception of sleepiness. DESIGN: Habitual night followed by 1 night of total sleep loss (acute sleep deprivation) or 5 consecutive nights of 4 hr of sleep (chronic sleep restriction) and recovery night. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen healthy middle-aged male participants (age [(± standard deviation] = 49.7 ± 2.6 yr, range 46-55 yr). MEASUREMENTS: Multiple sleep latency test trials, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale scores, simple reaction time test (lapses and 10% fastest reaction times), and nocturnal polysomnography data were recorded. RESULTS: Objective and subjective sleepiness increased immediately in response to sleep restriction. Sleep latencies after the second and third nights of sleep restriction reached levels equivalent to those observed after acute sleep deprivation, whereas Karolinska Sleepiness Scale scores did not reach these levels. Lapse occurrence increased after the second day of sleep restriction and reached levels equivalent to those observed after acute sleep deprivation. A statistical model revealed that sleepiness and lapses did not progressively worsen across days of sleep restriction. Ten percent fastest reaction times (i.e., optimal alertness) were not affected by acute or chronic sleep deprivation. Recovery to baseline levels of alertness and performance occurred after 8-hr recovery night. CONCLUSIONS: In middle-aged study participants, sleep restriction induced a high increase in sleep propensity but adaptation to chronic sleep restriction occurred beyond day 3 of restriction. This sleepiness attenuation was underestimated by the participants. One recovery night restores daytime sleepiness and cognitive performance deficits induced by acute or chronic sleep deprivation. CITATION: Philip P; Sagaspe P; Prague M; Tassi P; Capelli A; Bioulac B; Commenges D; Taillard J. Acute versus chronic partial sleep deprivation in middle-aged people: differential effect on performance and sleepiness. SLEEP 2012;35(7):997-1002.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5665/sleep.1968

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that systematically examined the same subjects in both chronic sleep restriction and acute total sleep deprivation reported inconsistent results, likely due to small sample sizes, different populations, varying doses of sleep restriction, and different outcome measures.

    “These studies reported inconsistent results, likely due to small sample sizes, different populations, varying doses of sleep restriction, and different outcome measures.”

    From Circadian rhythms, sleep deprivation, and human performance (2013) · cites this paper as [179]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Philip, P., Sagaspe, P., Prague, M., Tassi, P., Capelli, A., Bioulac, B., Commenges, D., & Taillard, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Laboratoire de psychologie des cognitions (FR)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Philip, Pierre
Venue
SLEEP
Published
2012-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
997-1002
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2030754828
Cited by
84
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • CHIST-ERA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
acute sleep deprivation, chronic sleep restriction, total sleep deprivation, daytime sleepiness, sustained attention, cognitive performance, reaction time, sleep latency, middle-aged adults, sleep recovery
MeSH terms
Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Wakefulness, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review