Cited by 424Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMind wandering and attention

Relations Between Performance and Subjective Ratings of Sleepiness During a Night Awake

Gillberg, Mats, Kecklund, Göran, Åkerstedt, Torbjörn·1994·Sleep

Abstract

The present study validated the nine-point Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) and the new Accumulated Time with Sleepiness (ATS) scale against performance of laboratory tasks. The ATS scale was designed as a method for integrating subjective sleepiness over longer time periods. The subjects were asked if certain symptoms of sleepiness had occurred and, if so, for how long. Six subjects participated twice. Each time they were kept awake during the night (except for a short nap occurring during one of the nights in a counterbalanced order) and were tested at 2200, 0200, 0400 and 0600 hours. The tests included a 10-minute rest period, a 28-minute visual vigilance task and an 11-minute single reaction time task. KSS and visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings were given before each test, and ATS ratings were given after. Performance deteriorated clearly, and all three rating scales reflected increased sleepiness with time of night. Scores on the KSS and VAS showed high correlations with performance tasks (mean intraindividual correlations were between 0.49 and 0.71). Performance correlated even higher with the ATS ratings (r = 0.73-0.79). Intercorrelations between rating scales were also high (r = 0.65-0.86). It was concluded that there were strong relations between ratings of sleepiness and performance, that the ATS rating scale was at least as good as the other scales and that the ratings were affected by type of task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/17.3.236

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale is a 9-point Likert scale with valid point values, where odd numbers have descriptions from 1 (extremely alert) to 9 (extremely sleepy).

    “The KSS is a 9-point Likert scale with all numbers having valid point values, but only the odd numbers have descriptions: 1 representing ' extremely alert, ' 3 representing ' alert, ' 5 representing ' neither alert nor sleepy, ' and 9 representing ' extremely sleepy ' (9, 41).”

    From Evening use of light-emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next-morning alertness. (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Methods (p. 2) describe the KSS as a nine-point scale from 1 (“very alert”) to 9 (“very sleepy, fighting sleep, an effort to keep awake”), with verbal descriptions at every second point. Our copy does not give the descriptions for points 3 and 5, so those specific labels in the citing sentence are not verified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]1. Torsvall L, Åkerstedt T. Sleepiness on the job: continuously measured EEG changes in train drivers. Electroencephalogr Clinical Neurophysiol 1987;66:502–11. Ratings predicted performance to a high degree; 35– 50% of the variance in performance scores could be explained by the prior KSS ratings, and this was slightly better than for the VAS ratings. In recent studies John-o,, odt d t St t t ( ot jective" sleepiness measures (multiple sleep latency test and lapses in a tapping task). However, their design and methods for analyzing data might not have been optimal for the purpose of demonstrating relationships. The correlations were calculated across individuals on data aggregated over several measurements, a method that might adequately reveal individual differences but not the sensitivity of self-rating methods. Furthermore, there might have been a restriction of variance due to inadequate manipulation of the underlying sleepiness. Similarly, Herscovitch and Broughton (6) found no correspondence between SSS and performance. The temporal relations between ratings and performance were not clear, however, with the exception of ratings given immediately after tests.
  2. [2]2. Kecklund G, Åkerstedt T. Sieepiness in long distance truck driving: an ambulatory EEG study of night driving. Ergonomics 1993;36:1007-17. There was an even closer covariation between the quality of performance and the ensuing rating of symptoms of sleepiness (ATS). The explained variances were around 50–60%. Glenville and Broughton (5) reported similar correlations for SSS with vigilance and reaction time performance. The higher correlations after tests might be explained by the fact that it may be easier to rate with precision after a specific task because the situation limits extraneous (uncontrolled) influences on alertness and, furthermore, because subjects may be influenced by their perceived quality of performance when rating their sleepiness. These explanations are supported by findings that show higher self-rated sleepiness during or immediately after a performance task
  3. [4]4. Åkerstedt T, Gillberg M. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Internat Neurosci 1990;52:29–37.
  4. [3]3. Torsvall L, Åkerstedt T, Gillander K, Knutsson A. Sleep on the night shift: 24-hour EEĠ monitoring of spontaneous sleep/wake behaviour. Psychophysiology 1989;26:112–8.
  5. [5]5. Glenville M, Broughton R. Reliability of the Stanford Sleepiness Scale compared to short duration performance tests and the Wilkinson auditory vigilance task. In: Passouant P, Oswald I, eds. Pharmacology of the states of alertness. Oxford: Pergamon, 1979:235-44.
  6. [7]7. Johnson LC, Spinweber CL, Gomez SA, Matteson LT. Daytime sleepiness, performance, mood, nocturnal sleep: the effect of benzodiazepine and caffeine on their relationship. Sleep 1990; 13:121-35.
  7. [6]6. Herscovitch J, Broughton R. Sensitivity of the Stanford sleepiness scale to the effects of cumulative partial sleep deprivation and recovery oversleeping. Sleep 1981;4:83–92.
  8. [8]8. Johnson LC, Freeman CR, Spinweber CL, Gomez SA. Subjective and objective measures of sleepiness: the effect of benzo- - diazepine and caffeine on their relationship. Psychophysiology 13. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile 1991;28:65-71. data. Psychometrica 1959;24:377–93.
  9. [14]14. Angus RG, Heslegrave RJ. Effects of sleep loss on sustained cognitive performance during a command and control simulation. Behav Res Methods, Instruments and Computers 1985;17: 55-67.
  10. [9]9. Akerstedt T, Gillberg M. The circadian variation of experimentally displaced sleep. Sleep 1981;4:159–69.
  11. [11]11. Lisper H-O, Kjellberg A. Éffects of 24-hour sleep deprivation on rate of decrement in a 10-minute reaction time task. J Exp Psychol 1972;96:287–90.
  12. [10]10. Gillberg M, Akerstedt T. Possible measures of "sleepiness" for the evaluation of disturbed and displaced sleep. In: Reinberg A, Vieux N, Andlauer P, eds. Night and shiftwork—biological and social aspects. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981:155–60.
  13. [15]15. Dinges DF, Orne MT, Orne EC. Sleepiness during sleep deprivation: the effects of performance demands and circadian phase. Sleep Res 1984;13:189.
  14. [12]12. Puri ML. Non-parametric techniques in statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
  15. [16]16. Babkoff H, Caspy T, Mikulincer M. Subjective sleepiness ratings: the effects of sleep deprivation, cirċadian rhythmicity and cognitive performance. Sleep 1991;14:534–9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillberg, M., Kecklund, G., & Åkerstedt, T.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Gillberg, Mats
Venue
Sleep
Published
1994-05
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
236-241
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W254030361
Cited by
423
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
sleepiness, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, visual vigilance task, reaction time, sleep deprivation, scale validation, visual analogue scale, performance degradation
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self-Assessment, Sleep Deprivation, Task Performance and Analysis, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review