Cited by 24Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Development of an Instrument to Measure Pharmacy Student Attitudes Toward Social Media Professionalism

Open access
Chisholm-Burns, Marie A., Spivey, Christina A., Jaeger, Melanie C., Williams, Jennifer, George, Christa·2017·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objectives. To develop and validate a scale measuring pharmacy students’ attitudes toward social media professionalism, and assess the impact of an educational presentation on social media professionalism. Methods. A social media professionalism scale was used in a pre- and post-survey to determine the effects of a social media professionalism presentation. The 26-item scale was administered to 197 first-year pharmacy (P1) students during orientation. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to determine the number of underlying factors responsible for covariation of the data. Principal components analysis was used as the extraction method. Varimax was selected as the rotation method. Cronbach’s alpha was estimated. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare pre- and post-scores of each item, subscale, and total scale. Results. There were 187 (95%) students who participated. The final scale had five subscales and 15 items. Subscales were named according to the professionalism tenet they best represented. Scores of items addressing reading/posting to social media during class, an employer’s use of social media when making hiring decisions, and a college/university’s use of social media as a measure of professional conduct significantly increased from pre-test to post-test. The “honesty and integrity” subscale score also significantly increased. Conclusion. The social media professionalism scale measures five tenets of professionalism and exhibits satisfactory reliability. The presentation improved P1 students’ attitudes regarding social media professionalism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe81465

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Board of Internal Medicine Committees on Evaluation of Clinical Competence and Clinical Competence and Communication Programs. Project Professionalism. Philadelphia, PA: American Board of Internal Medicine; 2001:5-6.
  2. Statistical analysis: a manual on dissertation and thesis statistics in SPSS. http://www.statisticssolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/ SPSS%20Manual.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2015.
  3. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 3 rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chisholm-Burns, M. A., Spivey, C. A., Jaeger, M. C., Williams, J., & George, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
81
Issue
4
Pages
65
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2622545727
Cited by
24
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
pharmacy students, scale development, honesty and integrity, educational intervention, pharmacy education
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Attitude, Education, Pharmacy, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Pharmacy, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review