Cited by 239Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth and Medical StudiesGlobal Health and Epidemiology

Burden of disease and injury in Australia in the new millennium: measuring health loss from diseases, injuries and risk factors

Begg, Stephen J, Vos, Theo, Barker, Bridget, Stanley, Lucy, Lopez, Alan D·2008·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnitude and distribution of health problems in Australia, in order to identify key opportunities for health gain. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological models for a comprehensive set of diseases and injuries of public health importance in Australia were developed using a range of data sources, methods and assumptions. Health loss associated with each condition was derived using normative techniques and quantified for various subpopulations, risks to health, and points in time. The baseline year for comparisons was 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health loss expressed as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and presented as proportions of total DALYs and DALY rates (crude and age-standardised) per 1000 population. RESULTS: A third of total health loss in 2003 was explained by 14 selected health risks. DALY rates were 31.7% higher in the lowest socioeconomic quintile than in the highest, and 26.5% higher in remote areas than in major cities. Total DALY rates were estimated to decline for most conditions over the 20 years from 2003 to 2023, but for some causes, most notably diabetes, they were projected to increase. CONCLUSION: Despite steady improvements in Australia's health over the past decade, there are still opportunities for further progress. Significant gains can be made through achievable changes in exposure to a limited number of well established health risks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01503.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Begg, S. J., Vos, T., Barker, B., Stanley, L., & Lopez, A. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2008-01
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
36-40
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W1538627990
Cited by
239
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 20
FWCI
45.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Cancer Australia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
Keywords
disease burden, injuries, disability-adjusted life years, health loss, health risk factors, socioeconomic inequalities in health, diabetes mellitus, Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Chronic Disease, Epidemiologic Methods, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Risk Factors, Wounds and Injuries, Health Behavior, Cost of Illness, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review