Cited by 23Socioeconomics of Resources and ConservationSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisLand Use and Ecosystem Services

The Capacity-Building Stewardship Model: assessment of an agricultural network as a mechanism for improving regional agroecosystem sustainability

Open access
Duff, Alison J., Zedler, Paul H., Barzen, Jeb A., Knuteson, Deana L.·2017·Ecology and Society

Abstract

Duff, A. J., P. H. Zedler, J. A. Barzen, and D. L. Knuteson. 2017. The Capacity-Building Stewardship Model: assessment of an agricultural network as a mechanism for improving regional agroecosystem sustainability. Ecology and Society 22(1):45. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09146-220145

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-09146-220145

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Duff, A. J. 2014. Prescribing an agroecosystem framework for integrating conservation and agricultural production goals: the Healthy Grown Potato Program as a working lands case study. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Haufler, J. B., editor. 2005. Fish and wildlife benefits of Farm Bill conservation programs: 2000-2005 update. Wildlife Society Technical Review 05-2.
  3. Lynch, S., D. Sexson, C. Benbrook, M. Carter, J. Wyman, P. Nowak, J. Barzen, S. Diercks, and J. Wallendal. 2000. Working out the bugs. Special focus: Food Quality Protection Act. Choices 15(3):28-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duff, A. J., Zedler, P. H., Barzen, J. A., & Knuteson, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • International Crane Foundation (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
Venue
Ecology and Society
Published
2017
Volume
22
Issue
1
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2599233943
Cited by
23
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
capacity building, stewardship model, agricultural networks, agroecosystem sustainability, regional sustainability, agricultural extension, sustainability assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review