Cited by 42Pleural and Pulmonary DiseasesEndometriosis Research and TreatmentMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies

Clinical-Pathological Findings of Catamenial Pneumothorax: Comparison between Recurrent Cases and Non-Recurrent Cases

Open access
Haga, Takahiro, Kurihara, Masatoshi, Kataoka, Hideyuki, Ebana, Hiroki·2014·Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: Catamenial pneumothorax (CP) is classified as thoracic endometriosis syndrome. There are few reports of CP, and the clinical manifestations of this disease are unclear. The aim of the present study is to clarify the features of CP. METHODS: The clinical and pathological files of the 92 female patients pathologically diagnosed with thoracic endometriosis are included in this study. The clinical data and pathological findings of the recurrent and non-recurrent groups are compared. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (39.1%) experienced recurrence, 37 (40.2%) patients did not, and 19 (20.4) patients could not be evaluated. The ratio of the endometrial gland in the diaphragm is significantly higher in the recurrent cases in comparison to non-recurrent cases (66.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The recurrence rate of CP is high. Further study of the optimal management strategies is needed, especially for CP cases with the endometrial gland in the diaphragm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.02227

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of glands in resected tissues has been associated with postoperative recurrence of TE.

    “The presence of glands in the resected tissues has been associated with postoperative recurrence.”

    From Extra-pelvic endometriosis: a review. (2020) · cites this paper as [94]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alifano M, Roth T, Broët SC, et al. Catamenial pneumothorax: a prospective study. Chest 2003; 124: 1004-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haga, T., Kurihara, M., Kataoka, H., & Ebana, H.
Affiliations
Nissan Tamagawa Hospital (JP)
Venue
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2014
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
202-206
ISSN
  • 1341-1098 (ISSN-L)
  • 2186-1005
OpenAlex
W2033232187
Cited by
41
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Keywords
catamenial pneumothorax, thoracic endometriosis, recurrent pneumothorax, clinicopathological correlation, female patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Choristoma, Diaphragm, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Lung, Middle Aged, Pleura, Pneumothorax, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review