The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Challenges to the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Di Paolo, E. (2009) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3 · Cited by 371
Gallagher, S. (2013) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.03.008 · Cited by 378
Dimensions of integration in embedded and extended cognitive systems
Heersmink, R. (2015) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9355-1 · Cited by 191
Loops, constitution, and cognitive extension
Orestis Palermos, S. (2014) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.04.002 · Cited by 155
Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitive
Rowlands, M. (2009) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080802703620 · Cited by 145
Toward a Metacognitive Account of Cognitive Offloading
Dunn, T. L., & Risko, E. F. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12273 · Cited by 122
The Cognitive Integration of E-Memory
Clowes, R. W. (2013) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-013-0130-y · Cited by 110
Inference to the hypothesis of extended cognition
Sprevak, M. (2010) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.10.010 · Cited by 62
Distributed learning: Educating and assessing extended cognitive systems
Heersmink, R., & Knight, S. (2018) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2018.1469122 · Cited by 54
Cassinadri, G. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00701-7 · Cited by 54
“EXT is highly debated given the presence of a more moderate alternative, the embedded cognition theory (EMB), which considers cognitive processes as brain or organism-bounded and only causally influenced by technological resources, but not constituted by them (Rupert 2004).”
BackgroundFarina, M., & Lavazza, A. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00508-4 · Cited by 40
Externalized memory in slime mould and the extended (non-neuronal) mind
Sims, M., & Kiverstein, J. (2022) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.12.001 · Cited by 40
The Ethics of the Extended Mind: Mental Privacy, Manipulation and Agency
Clowes, R. W., Smart, P., & Heersmink, R. (2024) · Techno:Phil – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68362-0_2 · Cited by 20
Transactive Memory Reconstructed: Rethinking Wegner's Research Program
Huebner, B. (2016) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12160 · Cited by 17
Moral Reasons Not to Posit Extended Cognitive Systems: a Reply to Farina and Lavazza
Cassinadri, G. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00560-0 · Cited by 14
From cognition’s location to the epistemology of its nature
Barker, M. J. (2010) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.05.001 · Cited by 13
Demarcating the Realm of Cognition
Varga, S. (2018) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-017-9375-y · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Rupert, R. D., & Journal of Philosophy, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 389-428
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107958960
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.