The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem
Abstract
Killing, Letting Die, and The Trolley Problem Get access Judith Jarvis Thomson Judith Jarvis Thomson Massachusetts Institute of Technology Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar The Monist, Volume 59, Issue 2, 1 April 1976, Pages 204–217, https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224 Published: 19 December 2014
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality
Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2016.00074 · Cited by 1,993
Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk
Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7 · Cited by 668
Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models
Srivastava, A., Rastogi, A., Rao, A., Shoeb, A. A. M., Abid, A., Fisch, A., Brown, A. R., Santoro, A., Gupta, A., Garriga-Alonso, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.04615 · Cited by 569
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000165 · Cited by 317
Autonomous Cars: In Favor of a Mandatory Ethics Setting
Gogoll, J., & Müller, J. F. (2017) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9806-x · Cited by 251
Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars
Lin, P. (2015) · Autonomes Fahren · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_4 · Cited by 189
ChatGPT’s inconsistent moral advice influences users’ judgment
Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31341-0 · Cited by 183
Beyond artificial intelligence: exploring artificial wisdom
Jeste, D. V., Graham, S. A., Nguyen, T. T., Depp, C. A., Lee, E. E., & Kim, H.-C. (2020) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610220000927 · Cited by 100
Byrd, N., & Conway, P. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007 · Cited by 77
Sauer, H. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108529181 · Cited by 72
Capable but Amoral? Comparing AI and Human Expert Collaboration in Ethical Decision Making
Tolmeijer, S., Christen, M., Kandul, S., Kneer, M., & Bernstein, A. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517732 · Cited by 70
Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes
Knutson, K. M., Krueger, F., Koenigs, M., Hawley, A., Escobedo, J. R., Vasudeva, V., Adolphs, R., & Grafman, J. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq005 · Cited by 66
When AI ethics Goes astray: a case study of autonomous vehicles
Etienne, H. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320906508 · Cited by 42
Architecture of explanatory inference in the human prefrontal cortex
Barbey, A. K., & Patterson, R. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00162 · Cited by 40
Mayer, M. M., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261673 · Cited by 36
Virtual Reality for Criminologists: A Road Map
van Gelder, J.-L. (2023) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/726691 · Cited by 31
“One frequently used paradigm to study moral decision-making is the well-known Trolley Problem (Thomson 1976).”
MethodMoral judgement in early bilinguals: Language dominance influences responses to moral dilemmas
Wong, G., & Ng, B. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01070 · Cited by 31
The trolley problem revisited an exploratory study
Rehman, S., & Dzionek‑Kozłowska, J. (2018) · Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym · doi:10.18778/1899-2226.21.3.02 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomson, J. J., & The Hegeler Institute
- Venue
- Monist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-217
- ISSN
- 0026-9662 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089012547
- Cited by
- 1,341
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
