The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health benefits of legumes and pulses with a focus on Australian sweet lupins.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The 68th United Nations General Assembly declared 2016 the International Year of Pulses. Therefore it is timely to review the current evidence of the benefits of legumes for human health with a focus on Australian sweet lupins. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library were searched to identify cross-sectional/epidemiological studies, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews. RESULTS: The strongest evidence appears to be for links between eating legumes and reduced risk of colorectal cancer as well as eating soy foods and reduced LDL cholesterol. However, epidemiological studies and RCTs suggest that replacing several meat-based meals a week with legumes can have a positive impact on longevity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and weight management, potentially via favourable effects on the gut microbiome. Sweet lupins are unique among legumes with one of the highest combined amounts of digestible plant protein (38%) and dietary fibre (30%). Unlike other legumes, their low amount of anti-nutritional factors negates the need for soaking/cooking and they can therefore be eaten uncooked. Sweet lupins may lower blood pressure, improve blood lipids and insulin sensitivity and favourably alter the gut microbiome. There is growing interest in pulses, especially sweet lupins, as ingredients to improve the nutritional value of baked goods (particularly gluten free) and to create novel products to replace meat. CONCLUSION: Legumes form part of most traditional diets. They, including sweet lupins, can play a useful role in health maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease
Cho, I., & Blaser, M. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3182 · Cited by 3,449
Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Soy Protein Intake on Serum Lipids
Anderson, J. W., Johnstone, B. M., & Cook-Newell, M. E. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199508033330502 · Cited by 2,048
De Filippis, F., Pellegrini, N., Vannini, L., Jeffery, I. B., La Storia, A., Laghi, L., Serrazanetti, D. I., Di Cagno, R., Ferrocino, I., Lazzi, C., et al. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309957 · Cited by 1,638
Afshin, A., Micha, R., Khatibzadeh, S., & Mozaffarian, D. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.076901 · Cited by 509 · cited 2×
“Similarly a meta-analysis by Afshin et al, concluded that 4 weekly 100-g servings of legumes was associated with 14% lower risk of total IHD.(58) A randomised intervention study conducted in Spain, the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED), on 7,447 high risk participants (with no history of CVD) demonstrated t…”
ResultInfluentialSoy food intake and breast cancer survival
Shu, X. O. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1783 · Cited by 436
Epidemiology of soy exposures and breast cancer risk
Wu, A. H., Yu, M. C., Tseng, C.-C., & Pike, M. C. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604145 · Cited by 418
Legume and soy food intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Shanghai Women's Health Study
Villegas, R., Gao, Y.-T., Yang, G., Li, H.-L., Elasy, T. A., Zheng, W., & Shu, X. O. (2008) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/87.1.162 · Cited by 393
Sluijs, I., Beulens, J. W. J., van der A, D. L., Spijkerman, A. M. W., Grobbee, D. E., & van der Schouw, Y. T. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-1321 · Cited by 335
Bazzano, L. A., Thompson, A. M., Tees, M. T., Nguyen, C. H., & Winham, D. M. (2011) · Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2009.08.012 · Cited by 300
Ha, V., Sievenpiper, J. L., de Souza, R. J., Jayalath, V. H., Mirrahimi, A., Agarwal, A., Chiavaroli, L., Mejia, S. B., Sacks, F. M., Di Buono, M., et al. (2014) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.131727 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Cowpea: an overview on its nutritional facts and health benefits
Jayathilake, C., Visvanathan, R., Deen, A., Bangamuwage, R., Jayawardana, B. C., Nammi, S., & Liyanage, R. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9074 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Kouris‐Blazos, A., & Belski, R.
- Venue
- PubMed
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- OpenAlex
- W2337148929
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health benefits of legumes and pulses with a focus on Australian sweet lupins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6133/apjcn.2016.25.1.23
- The paper
- Kouris‐Blazos, A., & Belski, R. (2016). Health benefits of legumes and pulses with a focus on Australian sweet lupins. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.2016.25.1.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.