Cited by 517Circadian rhythm and melatoninOcular and Laser Science ResearchLight effects on plants

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of blue light on the circadian system and eye physiology

Open access

Abstract

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have been used to provide illumination in industrial and commercial environments. LEDs are also used in TVs, computers, smart phones, and tablets. Although the light emitted by most LEDs appears white, LEDs have peak emission in the blue light range (400-490 nm). The accumulating experimental evidence has indicated that exposure to blue light can affect many physiologic functions, and it can be used to treat circadian and sleep dysfunctions. However, blue light can also induce photoreceptor damage. Thus, it is important to consider the spectral output of LED-based light sources to minimize the danger that may be associated with blue light exposure. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the effects of blue light on the regulation of physiologic functions and the possible effects of blue light exposure on ocular health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.63500/mv_v22_61

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A comparison of the power spectrum of a standard white-light LED, a tricolor fluorescent lamp, and an incandescent source. The radically different power spectrums can look similar when viewed directly by the eye, irrespective of how much blue emission is present.
Figure 1 A comparison of the power spectrum of a standard white-light LED, a tricolor fluorescent lamp, and an incandescent source. The radically different power spectrums can look similar when viewed directly by the eye, irrespective of how much blue emission is present.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 In addition to the classical photoreceptors (rods and cones), ipRGCs are present in the retina. Recent studies have shown that at least two types of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) have been identified: M1 and M2. Most of the M1 cells project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus whereas the number of M1 and M2 projecting to the olivary pretectal nucleus (OPN) is similar (55% from M1 cells versus 45% from M2 cells). The M1 cells are considerably smaller but respond with significantly larger depolarizations and light-induced currents than do the M2 cells. Other neural targets of ipRGCs not shown in the figure include the preoptic area, sub-paraventricular zone, anterior hypothalamic nucleus, lateral hypothalamus, medial amygdaloid nucleus, lateral habenula, lateral geniculate nucleus (dorsal division), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and superior colliculus. OS=outer segments; IS=inner segments; ONL=outer nuclear layer; OPL=outer plexiform layer; INL=inner nuclear layer; IPL=inner plexiform layer; GCL=ganglion cell layer; from [31] with permission.
Figure 2 In addition to the classical photoreceptors (rods and cones), ipRGCs are present in the retina. Recent studies have shown that at least two types of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) have been identified: M1 and M2. Most of the M1 cells project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus whereas the number of M1 and M2 projecting to the olivary pretectal nucleus (OPN) is similar (55% from M1 cells versus 45% from M2 cells). The M1 cells are considerably smaller but respond with significantly larger depolarizations and light-induced currents than do the M2 cells. Other neural targets of ipRGCs not shown in the figure include the preoptic area, sub-paraventricular zone, anterior hypothalamic nucleus, lateral hypothalamus, medial amygdaloid nucleus, lateral habenula, lateral geniculate nucleus (dorsal division), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periaqueductal gray, and superior colliculus. OS=outer segments; IS=inner segments; ONL=outer nuclear layer; OPL=outer plexiform layer; INL=inner nuclear layer; IPL=inner plexiform layer; GCL=ganglion cell layer; from [31] with permission.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Top panels. The exposure to blue light (λmax 474), green light (λmax 513), or fluorescent light at the intensity of 1×10−1 μW/cm2 for 4 h/day for 30 days did not produce a significant change in the number of cells in the photoreceptor layers of the Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6; see [121] for details about the methods used to quantify cells in the photoreceptor layer). Lower panels. The exposure to blue or green light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for 4 h in the middle of the day did not induce apoptosis. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated uridine 5′-triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay: 4- to 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6) were anesthetized (75 mg/kg ketamine and 23 mg/kg xylazine), kept on heating pads (37 °C), and exposed to blue or green light for 4 h. The pupils were dilated with 1% atropine and 2.5% phenylephrine eye drops 45 min before the light exposure. Rats were then killed 16 h after the exposure to blue light or green light. The eyes were explanted and fixed using freshly prepared 4% polyformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4 for 20 min at room temperature. They were washed 3X with PBS, permeabilized with freshly prepared 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate for 2 min on ice (2–8 °C), and then the TUNEL reaction was performed according to the instructions included in the manual (In Situ cell Death Detection kit). The slides were incubated in a humidified container for 60 min at 37 °C in the dark. Slides were rinsed 3X with PBS, and samples were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioskop).
Figure 3 Top panels. The exposure to blue light (λmax 474), green light (λmax 513), or fluorescent light at the intensity of 1×10−1 μW/cm2 for 4 h/day for 30 days did not produce a significant change in the number of cells in the photoreceptor layers of the Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6; see [121] for details about the methods used to quantify cells in the photoreceptor layer). Lower panels. The exposure to blue or green light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for 4 h in the middle of the day did not induce apoptosis. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated uridine 5′-triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay: 4- to 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6) were anesthetized (75 mg/kg ketamine and 23 mg/kg xylazine), kept on heating pads (37 °C), and exposed to blue or green light for 4 h. The pupils were dilated with 1% atropine and 2.5% phenylephrine eye drops 45 min before the light exposure. Rats were then killed 16 h after the exposure to blue light or green light. The eyes were explanted and fixed using freshly prepared 4% polyformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4 for 20 min at room temperature. They were washed 3X with PBS, permeabilized with freshly prepared 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate for 2 min on ice (2–8 °C), and then the TUNEL reaction was performed according to the instructions included in the manual (In Situ cell Death Detection kit). The slides were incubated in a humidified container for 60 min at 37 °C in the dark. Slides were rinsed 3X with PBS, and samples were analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axioskop).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Different light treatments did not affect rhodopsin mRNA levels (one-way ANOVA, p>0.1). Exposure to blue light (λmax 474) at the intensity of 1×10−1 μW/cm2 for 4 h/day for 30 days produced significant changes in the mRNA levels of short wavelength sensitive (SW) opsin, melanopsin, and medium wavelength sensitive opsin (* one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak tests, p<0.05). Rats were exposed to blue, green, or white light-emitting diodes (LEDs) every day (4 h) for 30 days in the middle of the day (11:00 to 15:00) and then returned to a 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle. The intensity of the light during the light phase of the 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle was about 400–450 lux. Every day, the pupils were dilated with 1% atropine and 2.5% phenylephrine eye drops 45 min before exposure to blue, green, or white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). After 30 days, the rats were killed, and the retinas were explanted, immediately frozen, and stored at −80 °C. mRNA was then extracted, and mRNA levels were measured using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR; see [122] for details about primers and qPCR conditions).
Figure 4 Different light treatments did not affect rhodopsin mRNA levels (one-way ANOVA, p>0.1). Exposure to blue light (λmax 474) at the intensity of 1×10−1 μW/cm2 for 4 h/day for 30 days produced significant changes in the mRNA levels of short wavelength sensitive (SW) opsin, melanopsin, and medium wavelength sensitive opsin (* one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak tests, p<0.05). Rats were exposed to blue, green, or white light-emitting diodes (LEDs) every day (4 h) for 30 days in the middle of the day (11:00 to 15:00) and then returned to a 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle. The intensity of the light during the light phase of the 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle was about 400–450 lux. Every day, the pupils were dilated with 1% atropine and 2.5% phenylephrine eye drops 45 min before exposure to blue, green, or white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). After 30 days, the rats were killed, and the retinas were explanted, immediately frozen, and stored at −80 °C. mRNA was then extracted, and mRNA levels were measured using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR; see [122] for details about primers and qPCR conditions).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 126 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
Tosini, G., Ferguson, I., & Tsubota, K.
Affiliations
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
  • Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tosini, Gianluca
Venue
Molecular Vision
Published
2016-01
Volume
22
Pages
61-72
ISSN
1090-0535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294594166
Cited by
517
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 3
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular vision (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NCC958)
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NCC 9‐58)
  • National Institutes of Health (NCC9-58)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY022216)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
Keywords
blue light, light-emitting diodes, circadian rhythm, circadian system, sleep disorders, photoreceptor damage, eye health, eye physiology, blue light exposure, light spectrum
MeSH terms
Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Light, Ocular Physiological Phenomena, Photic Stimulation, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review