Cited by 194Gut microbiota and healthGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Gut microbiota analysis results are highly dependent on the 16S rRNA gene target region, whereas the impact of DNA extraction is minor

Open access
Rintala, Anniina, Pietilä, Sami, Munukka, Eveliina, Eerola, Erkki, Pursiheimo, Juha-Pekka, Laiho, Asta, Pekkala, Satu, Huovinen, Pentti·2017·Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently the method of choice for analyzing gut microbiota composition. As gut microbiota composition is a potential future target for clinical diagnostics, it is of utmost importance to enhance and optimize the NGS analysis procedures. Here, we have analyzed the impact of DNA extraction and selected 16S rDNA primers on the gut microbiota NGS results. Bacterial DNA from frozen stool specimens was extracted with 5 commercially available DNA extraction kits. Special attention was paid to the semiautomated DNA extraction methods that could expedite the analysis procedure, thus being especially suitable for clinical settings. The microbial composition was analyzed with 2 distinct protocols: 1 targeting the V3-V4 and the other targeting the V4-V5 area of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The overall effect of DNA extraction on the gut microbiota 16S rDNA profile was relatively small, whereas the 16S rRNA gene target region had an immense impact on the results. Furthermore, semiautomated DNA extraction methods clearly appeared suitable for NGS procedures, proposing that application of these methods could importantly reduce hands-on time and human errors without compromising the validity of results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7171/jbt.17-2801-003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clostridium scindens is able to convert glucosteroids secreted in bile into androgens in vitro, which may affect local and systemic testosterone levels in vivo.

    “Furthermore, the bacterial strain Clostridium scindens is able to convert glucosteroids secreted in bile into androgens in vitro which may have an effect on local and systematic testosterone levels in vivo (75, 76).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Walker AW, Martin JC, Scott P, Parkhill J, Flint HJ, Scott KP. 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the human infant gut microbiota is strongly influenced by sample processing and PCR primer choice. Microbiome 2015;3:26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rintala, A., Pietilä, S., Munukka, E., Eerola, E., Pursiheimo, J.-P., Laiho, A., Pekkala, S., & Huovinen, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Turku Centre for Biotechnology (FI)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Corresponding author
Rintala, Anniina
Venue
Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT
Published
2017-04
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
19-30
ISSN
  • 1524-0215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4731
OpenAlex
W2593416970
Cited by
194
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 6
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Turun Yliopistosäätiö
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
gut microbiota, 16S rRNA gene, DNA extraction, V3-V4 region, V4-V5 region, fecal samples, microbiome sequencing, sample preparation optimization
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Molecular Typing, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review