Cited by 32Resilience and Mental HealthStress and Burnout ResearchOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Testing a Resilience Model Among Canadian Forces Recruits

Skomorovsky, Alla, Stevens, Sonya·2013·Military Medicine

Abstract

Evidence suggests that personal characteristics serve as resilience factors, and may protect military personnel against the development of psychological distress, even during stressful conditions. Structural equation modeling analyses were conducted on data from Canadian Forces candidates undertaking their basic training (N = 200) to test the fit of a model of resilience that is comprised of several individual characteristics, such as personality, hardiness, and coping. The most parsimonious model of resilience with the best fit to the data was identified. This model consisted of neuroticism, military hardiness, and problem-solving coping. The results of the study were consistent with previous research, showing that personality, military hardiness, and coping are important predictors of life satisfaction and health. The proposed resilience model offers a useful approach for the development of training programs to enhance readiness and recovery in the military context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00389

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rundell JR, Ursano RJ: Psychiatric responses to war trauma. In: Emo- tional Aftermath of the Persian Gulf War, pp 43-81. Edited by RJ Ursano, AE Norwood. DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1996.
  2. Griffiths J, Ravindran AV, Merali Z, Anisman H: Dysthymia: neuro- chemical and behavioral perspectives. Mol Psychiatry 2000; 5: 242-61.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skomorovsky, A., & Stevens, S.
Affiliations
  • Defence Research and Development Canada (CA)
  • Saint Mary's University (CA)
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2013-08
Volume
178
Issue
8
Pages
829-837
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W2190876701
Cited by
32
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
resilience, military recruits, basic training, neuroticism, hardiness, coping, problem-solving coping, personality, life satisfaction, psychological distress, military preparedness, Canadian Armed Forces
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety Disorders, Canada, Humans, Military Personnel, Models, Psychological, Personal Satisfaction, Personality, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review