Cited by 216Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Trauma, resilience and saliostasis: effects of treatment in post-traumatic stress disorder

Davidson, Jonathan R. T., Payne, Victoria M., Connor, Kathryn M., Foa, Edna B., Rothbaum, Barbara O., Hertzberg, Michael A., Weisler, Richard H.·2005·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the concept of resilience and the question as to whether psychotropic medications or psychosocial treatments might have resilience-enhancing effects. This pilot study investigates resilience in a sample of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) before and after treatment. Effects of treatment with tiagabine, fluoxetine, sertraline alone, and sertraline with cognitive behavioural therapy on resilience were assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Changes in resilience after treatment were measured and response to treatment was predicted from demographic, resilience and baseline disability measures. Changes in resilience following treatment were statistically significant. Items that showed the greatest change related to confidence, control, coping, knowing where to turn for help and adaptability. Items showing the least change related to religious and existential aspects of resiliency, effort, acting on a hunch, decision-making and goals. In linear and logistic regression models, gender, baseline CD-RISC score, baseline Sheehan Disability Scale score and an individual item from the CD-RISC scale, 'Sense of Humor', were significant predictors of response to treatment. Treatment of PTSD significantly improved resilience and reduced symptoms in this sample. Further controlled studies are indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004850-200501000-00009

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, J. R. T., Payne, V. M., Connor, K. M., Foa, E. B., Rothbaum, B. O., Hertzberg, M. A., & Weisler, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Jonathan R. T.
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2005-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997536640
Cited by
216
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH56656)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, resilience, tiagabine, fluoxetine, sertraline, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment response, predictors of treatment response, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, psychotropic drugs, psychosocial interventions
MeSH terms
Tiagabine, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nipecotic Acids, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, GABA Agonists, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review