Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two Self-management Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control: A Randomized Trial

Bosworth, Hayden B., Olsen, Maren K., Grubber, Janet M., Neary, Alice M., Orr, Melinda M., Powers, Benjamin J., Adams, Martha B., Svetkey, Laura P., Reed, Shelby D., Li, Yanhong, Dolor, Rowena J., Oddone, Eugene Z.·2009·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Fewer than 40% of persons with hypertension in the United States have adequate blood pressure (BP) control. Objective: To compare 2 self-management interventions for improving BP control among hypertensive patients. Design: A 2 × 2 randomized trial, stratified by enrollment site and patient health literacy status, with 2-year follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00123058) Setting: 2 university-affiliated primary care clinics. Patients: 636 hypertensive patients. Intervention: A centralized, blinded, and stratified randomization algorithm was used to randomly assign eligible patients to receive usual care, a behavioral intervention (bimonthly tailored, nurse-administered telephone intervention targeting hypertension-related behaviors), home BP monitoring 3 times weekly, or the behavioral intervention plus home BP monitoring. Measurements: The primary outcome was BP control at 6-month intervals over 24 months. Results: 475 patients (75%) completed the 24-month BP follow-up. At 24 months, improvements in the proportion of patients with BP control relative to the usual care group were 4.3% (95% CI, −4.5% to 12.9%) in the behavioral intervention group, 7.6% (CI, −1.9% to 17.0%) in the home BP monitoring group, and 11.0% (CI, 1.9%, 19.8%) in the combined intervention group. Relative to usual care, the 24-month difference in systolic BP was 0.6 mm Hg (CI, −2.2 to 3.4 mm Hg) for the behavioral intervention group, −0.6 mm Hg (CI, −3.6 to 2.3 mm Hg) for the BP monitoring group, and −3.9 mm Hg (CI, −6.9 to −0.9 mm Hg) for the combined intervention group; patterns were similar for diastolic BP. Limitation: Changes in medication use and diet were monitored only in intervention participants; 24-month outcome data were missing for 25% of participants, BP control was adequate at baseline in 73% of participants, and the study setting was an academic health center. Conclusion: Combined home BP monitoring and tailored behavioral telephone intervention improved BP control, systolic BP, and diastolic BP at 24 months relative to usual care. Primary Funding Source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Pfizer Foundation Health Communication Initiative; and the American Heart Association.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0000605-200911170-00148

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Bosworth, H. B., Olsen, M. K., Grubber, J. M., Neary, A. M., Orr, M. M., Powers, B. J., Adams, M. B., Svetkey, L. P., Reed, S. D., Li, Y., Dolor, R. J., & Oddone, E. Z.
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2009-11-17
Volume
151
Issue
10
Pages
687-695
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W4256711237
Cited by
197
References
6
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two Self-management Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7326/0000605-200911170-00148
The paper
Bosworth, H. B., Olsen, M. K., Grubber, J. M., Neary, A. M., Orr, M. M., Powers, B. J., Adams, M. B., Svetkey, L. P., Reed, S. D., Li, Y., Dolor, R. J., & Oddone, E. Z. (2009). Two Self-management Interventions to Improve Hypertension Control: A Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/0000605-200911170-00148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.