Cited by 129Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchClinical practice guidelines implementation

The Management of Chronic Insomnia Disorder and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Synopsis of the 2019 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines

Mysliwiec, Vincent, Martin, Jennifer L., Ulmer, Christi S., Chowdhuri, Susmita, Brock, Matthew S., Spevak, Christopher, Sall, James·2020·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Description In September 2019, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved a new joint clinical practice guideline for assessing and managing patients with chronic insomnia disorder and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This guideline is intended to give health care teams a framework by which to screen, evaluate, treat, and manage the individual needs and preferences of VA and DoD patients with either of these conditions. Methods In October 2017, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group initiated a joint VA/DoD guideline development effort that included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the Institute of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline panel developed key questions, systematically searched and evaluated the literature, created three 1-page algorithms, and advanced 41 recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. Recommendations This synopsis summarizes the key recommendations of the guideline in 3 areas: diagnosis and assessment of OSA and chronic insomnia disorder, treatment and management of OSA, and treatment and management of chronic insomnia disorder. Three clinical practice algorithms are also included.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/m19-3575

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mysliwiec, V., Martin, J. L., Ulmer, C. S., Chowdhuri, S., Brock, M. S., Spevak, C., & Sall, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center (US)
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
325-336
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W3008474234
Cited by
129
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6
FWCI
18.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
chronic insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, veterans, military personnel, sleep disorder diagnosis, sleep disorder treatment, screening
MeSH terms
Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, United States Department of Defense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review