Cited by 37Sleep and related disordersPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and Trauma

Treatment of comorbid sleep disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder in U.S. active duty military personnel: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Open access
Taylor, Daniel J., Pruiksma, Kristi E., Mintz, Jim, Slavish, Danica C., Wardle‐Pinkston, Sophie, Dietch, Jessica R., Dondanville, Katherine A., Young‐McCaughan, Stacey +6 more·2023·Journal of Traumatic Stress

Abstract

Insomnia and nightmares are common in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They are associated with worse psychological and physical health and worse PTSD treatment outcomes. In addition, they are resistant to PTSD treatments, which do not typically address sleep disorders. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and nightmares (CBT-I&N) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for PTSD are first-line treatments, but limited evidence exists guiding the treatment of individuals with all three disorders. The current study randomized U.S. military personnel (N = 93) to one of three conditions: CBT-I&N delivered before CPT, CBT-I&N delivered after CPT, or CPT alone; all groups received 18 sessions. Across groups, participants demonstrated significantly improved PTSD symptoms. Because the study was terminated prematurely due to challenges with recruitment and retention, it was underpowered to answer the initially intended research questions. Nonetheless, statistical findings and relevant clinically meaningful changes were observed. Compared to participants who received CPT alone, those who received CBT-I&N and CPT, regardless of sequencing, demonstrated larger improvements in PTSD symptoms, d = -0.36; insomnia, d = -0.77; sleep efficiency, d = 0.62; and nightmares, d = -.53. Compared to participants who received CBT-I&N delivered before CPT, those who received CBT-I&N delivered after CPT demonstrated larger improvements in PTSD symptoms, d = 0.48, and sleep efficiency, d = -0.44. This pilot study suggests that treating comorbid insomnia, nightmares, and PTSD symptoms results in clinically meaningful advantages in improvement for all three concerns compared to treating PTSD alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.22939

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). 10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr [DOI] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. Respironics. (2005). Actiwatch instruction manual: Software version 5.0 [Computer software]. Respironics, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  3. Weathers FW, Blake DD, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, Marx BP, & Keane TM (2013). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-int/caps.asp [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Authors
Taylor, D. J., Pruiksma, K. E., Mintz, J., Slavish, D. C., Wardle‐Pinkston, S., Dietch, J. R., Dondanville, K. A., Young‐McCaughan, S., Nicholson, K. L., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Peterson, A. L., Resick, P. A., & Consortium to Alleviate PTSD
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Daniel J.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-15
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
712-726
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
OpenAlex
W4380872083
Cited by
37
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX001136‐01)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH‐13‐2‐0065)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, nightmares, sleep disorders, cognitive processing therapy, comorbid sleep disorders, military personnel, treatment sequencing, sleep efficiency
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Military Personnel, Pilot Projects, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review