Cited by 285Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesPolitical Economy and Marxism

Heteromation, and Other Stories of Computing and Capitalism

Ekbia, Hamid R., Nardi, Bonnie A.·2017·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

An exploration of a new division of labor between machines and humans, in which people provide value to the economy with little or no compensation. The computerization of the economy—and everyday life—has transformed the division of labor between humans and machines, shifting many people into work that is hidden, poorly compensated, or accepted as part of being a “user” of digital technology. Through our clicks and swipes, logins and profiles, emails and posts, we are, more or less willingly, participating in digital activities that yield economic value to others but little or no return to us. Hamid Ekbia and Bonnie Nardi call this kind of participation—the extraction of economic value from low-cost or free labor in computer-mediated networks—“heteromation.” In this book, they explore the social and technological processes through which economic value is extracted from digitally mediated work, the nature of the value created, and what prompts people to participate in the process. Arguing that heteromation is a new logic of capital accumulation, Ekbia and Nardi consider different kinds of heteromated labor: communicative labor, seen in user-generated content on social media; cognitive labor, including microwork and self-service; creative labor, from gaming environments to literary productions; emotional labor, often hidden within paid jobs; and organizing labor, made up of collaborative groups such as citizen scientists. Ekbia and Nardi then offer a utopian vision: heteromation refigured to bring end users more fully into the prosperity of capitalism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/10767.001.0001

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The global economy relies extensively on digitally-managed forms of un- or under-compensated labor, from user-generated content to microtasking platforms to F/OSS (heteromation).

    “They argue the global economy relies extensively on digitally-managed forms of un-or under-compensated labor, from user-generated content to microtasking platforms to F/OSS.”
  • Computational industries that benefit from this labor are subsidized by other institutions that support these people working cheaply or for free, ranging from welfare states, universities, family, or charity.

    “Computational industries that benefit from this labor are being subsidized by other institutions that support these people working cheaply or for free, ranging from welfare states, universities, family, or charity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekbia, H. R., & Nardi, B. A.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2017-05-04
OpenAlex
W2903975937
Cited by
285
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
20.71
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
division of labor, digital labor, value extraction, free labor, user-generated content, social media, microwork, self-service, citizen science, emotional labor, capital accumulation, capitalism, digital economy, user participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review